Translational Medicine, Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University Children's Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Aug;55(8):2108-2114. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24862. Epub 2020 May 28.
The multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBW) test offers a sensitive measure of airway function. In this study we aim to (a) assess the validity of the EasyOne Pro LAB (MBW ) in an in vitro lung model, (b) assess the feasibility, repeatability, and reproducibility of MBW and (c) compare outcomes with the Exhalyzer D (MBW ) and body plethysmography.
In vitro, functional residual capacity (FRC) measurements were assessed using a lung model under quasi-physiological conditions and compared to measured FRC. In vivo plethysmography and MBW were performed in a prospective study of children at two visits (n = 45 healthy; n = 41 cystic fibrosis [CF]). Bland-Altman plots were used to compare agreement between FRC and lung clearance index (LCI) measurements.
In vitro FRC measurements were repeatable but lung volumes were underestimated (mean relative difference -5.4% (limits of agreement [LA] -9.6%; -1.1%), 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.27; -4.45). In vivo, compared to plethysmography, FRC was consistently lower (-19.3% [-40.5; 1.9], 95% CI [-23.9; -14.7]), and showed a volume dependency. LCI values were also higher in children with smaller lung volumes. The within-test coefficient of variation of the FRC and LCI were 4.9% in health, and 5.6% and 6.9% in CF respectively. LCI was reproducible between-visits (mean relative difference [LA] -3.7% [-14.8, -7.5; 95% CI -6.6; -0.73] in health [n = 17] and 0.34% [-13.2, 22.8; 95% CI -5.0; 5.69] in CF [n = 23]). When calculated using the same algorithm, LCI was similar to LCI in health.
MBW measurements are feasible, repeatable, and reproducible, however, MBW-derived outcomes are not interchangeable with MBW .
多次呼吸氮冲洗(MBW)测试提供了气道功能的敏感测量。本研究旨在:(a)在体外肺模型中评估 EasyOne Pro LAB(MBW)的有效性,(b)评估 MBW 的可行性、重复性和可再现性,(c)并将结果与 Exhalyzer D(MBW)和体描仪进行比较。
在体外,使用准生理条件下的肺模型评估功能残气(FRC)测量,并将其与测量的 FRC 进行比较。在一项前瞻性研究中,对两次就诊的儿童进行了肺量计和 MBW 检查(n=45 例健康;n=41 例囊性纤维化[CF])。 Bland-Altman 图用于比较 FRC 和肺清除指数(LCI)测量的一致性。
体外 FRC 测量具有可重复性,但肺容积被低估(平均相对差异-5.4%(一致性区间[LA] -9.6%;-1.1%),95%置信区间[-6.27;-4.45])。在体内,与肺量计相比,FRC 始终较低(-19.3%[-40.5;1.9],95%置信区间[-23.9;-14.7]),且与体积呈依赖性。在肺容积较小的儿童中,LCI 值也较高。FRC 和 LCI 的测试内变异系数分别为健康者 4.9%,CF 者分别为 5.6%和 6.9%。LCI 在两次就诊之间具有可重复性(健康者平均相对差异[LA]-3.7%[-14.8,-7.5;95%置信区间-6.6;-0.73],n=17]和 CF [n=23]为 0.34%[-13.2,22.8;95%置信区间-5.0;5.69])。当使用相同的算法计算时,LCI 与健康者的 LCI 相似。
MBW 测量是可行的、可重复的和可再现的,但是,MBW 衍生的结果与 MBW 不可互换。