Suppr超能文献

健康成年人多次呼吸氮冲洗的控制自由呼吸法。

Controlled free breathing for multiple breath nitrogen washout in healthy adults.

作者信息

Handley Blake M, Jeagal Edward, Schoeffel Robin E, Badal Tanya, Chapman David G, Farrow Catherine E, King Gregory G, Robinson Paul D, Milne Stephen, Thamrin Cindy

机构信息

Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.

Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Glebe, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

ERJ Open Res. 2021 Jan 25;7(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00435-2020. eCollection 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBNW) quantifies ventilation heterogeneity. Two distinct protocols are currently used for MBNW testing: "controlled breathing", with targeted tidal volume ( ) and respiratory rate (RR); and "free breathing", with no constraints on breathing pattern. Indices derived from the two protocols (functional residual capacity (FRC), lung clearance index (LCI), , ) have not been directly compared in adults. We aimed to determine whether MBNW indices are comparable between protocols, to identify factors underlying any between-protocol differences and to determine the between-session variabilities of each protocol. We performed MBNW testing by both protocols in 27 healthy adult volunteers, applying the currently proposed correction for to and derived from free breathing. To establish between-session variability, we repeated testing in 15 volunteers within 3 months. While FRC was comparable between controlled free breathing (3.17 (0.98) 3.18 (0.94) L, p=0.88), indices of ventilation heterogeneity derived from the two protocols were not, with poor correlation for (r=0.18, p=0.36) and significant bias for (0.057 (0.021) L 0.085 (0.038) L, p=0.0004). Between-protocol differences in were related to differences in the breathing pattern, (p=0.004) and RR (p=0.01), rather than FRC. FRC and LCI showed good between-session repeatability, but and from free breathing showed poor repeatability with wide limits of agreement. These findings have implications for the ongoing clinical implementation of MBNW, as they demonstrate that and from free breathing, despite correction, are not equivalent to the controlled breathing protocol. The poor between-session repeatability of during free breathing may limit its clinical utility.

摘要

多次呼气氮清除法(MBNW)可量化通气不均一性。目前,MBNW测试使用两种不同的方案:“控制呼吸”,设定目标潮气量( )和呼吸频率(RR);以及“自由呼吸”,对呼吸模式无限制。这两种方案得出的指标(功能残气量(FRC)、肺清除指数(LCI)、 、 )在成年人中尚未进行直接比较。我们旨在确定MBNW指标在不同方案之间是否具有可比性,找出不同方案间差异的潜在因素,并确定每个方案在不同测试时段之间的变异性。我们对27名健康成年志愿者采用两种方案进行了MBNW测试,并对自由呼吸得出的 和 应用了当前提议的校正方法。为确定不同测试时段之间的变异性,我们在3个月内对15名志愿者进行了重复测试。虽然控制呼吸和自由呼吸之间的FRC具有可比性(3.17(0.98)L对3.18(0.94)L,p = 0.88),但两种方案得出的通气不均一性指标并不相同, 的相关性较差(r = 0.18,p = 0.36), 存在显著偏差(0.057(0.021)L对0.085(0.038)L,p = 0.0004)。 方案间的差异与呼吸模式、 (p = 0.004)和RR(p = 0.01)的差异有关,而非FRC。FRC和LCI在不同测试时段之间显示出良好的可重复性,但自由呼吸的 和 显示出较差的可重复性,一致性界限较宽。这些发现对MBNW目前的临床应用具有启示意义,因为它们表明,尽管进行了 校正,但自由呼吸的 和 与控制呼吸方案并不等效。自由呼吸期间 的较差的不同测试时段之间的可重复性可能会限制其临床应用价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0471/7836463/29aad83a7591/00435-2020.01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验