Division of Pediatric Cardiology, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Ahmanson/UCLA Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Los Angeles, California.
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Ahmanson/UCLA Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Los Angeles, California.
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Oct;17(10):1752-1758. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 May 11.
Although they are at lower risk, patients with previous extracardiac conduit (EC) Fontan still may require catheter ablation for supraventricular arrhythmia.
The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal approach to pulmonary venous atrium (PVA) access after EC Fontan operation.
All electrophysiological procedures requiring PVA over a 10-year period at the UCLA Medical Center were reviewed. PVA was grouped by transcaval cardiac puncture (TCP) or direct conduit puncture. Procedural characteristics and outcomes were compared.
Between June 2009 and November 2019, 23 electrophysiological procedures requiring PVA access were performed in 17 EC Fontan patients (53% male; median age 25 years; interquartile range 11-34). Cavoatrial overlap was identified in 14 patients by preprocedural imaging (10 cardiac computed tomography, 4 cardiac magnetic resonance). PVA access was obtained via TCP in 11, direct conduit puncture in 6, pre-existing fenestration in 5, and pulmonary artery puncture in 1. Time to PVA was significantly shorter for TCP vs direct conduit puncture (0.2 vs 1.1 hours, respectively; P = .03). The only predictor of successful TCP was the length of cavoatrial overlap by preprocedural imaging (14 vs 3 mm; P = .02). No procedural complications occurred. No change in oxygen saturation was noted, and no evidence of residual shunting was detected by follow-up echocardiography.
TCP is feasible in most patients after EC Fontan surgery and can be predicted by preprocedural advanced imaging. TCP is associated with shorter time to PVA and was uncomplicated in this single-center study. Preoperative assessment of cavoatrial overlap should be considered before catheter ablation for EC Fontan.
尽管风险较低,但之前接受过心外管道(EC)Fontan 的患者仍可能因室上性心律失常需要导管消融。
本研究旨在确定 EC Fontan 手术后经肺静脉心房(PVA)入路的最佳方法。
回顾了在加州大学洛杉矶分校医疗中心进行的 10 年间所有需要 PVA 介入的心电学程序。将 PVA 分为经腔静脉心脏穿刺(TCP)或直接管道穿刺。比较了程序特征和结果。
2009 年 6 月至 2019 年 11 月,17 例 EC Fontan 患者(53%为男性;中位年龄 25 岁;四分位距 11-34 岁)进行了 23 次需要 PVA 介入的心电学程序。14 例患者通过术前影像学检查发现腔静脉重叠(10 例心脏计算机断层扫描,4 例心脏磁共振)。11 例患者通过 TCP 获得 PVA 入路,6 例通过直接管道穿刺,5 例通过预先存在的窗孔,1 例通过肺动脉穿刺。TCP 与直接管道穿刺相比,PVA 到达时间显著缩短(分别为 0.2 和 1.1 小时,P =.03)。TCP 成功的唯一预测因素是术前影像学检查中腔静脉重叠的长度(14 与 3 毫米;P =.02)。无操作并发症发生。随访超声心动图未发现氧饱和度变化,也未发现残余分流的证据。
在大多数 EC Fontan 手术后的患者中,TCP 是可行的,并且可以通过术前的高级影像学预测。在这项单中心研究中,TCP 与到达 PVA 的时间较短且操作简单。在对 EC Fontan 进行导管消融术前,应考虑腔静脉重叠的术前评估。