Division of Cardiology Evangelishces Krankenhaus Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany.
Institute of Neural and Sensory Physiology Heinrich Heine University DüsseldorfMedical Faculty Düsseldorf Germany.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 6;10(13):e020835. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.020835. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
Background Ultra-high-density mapping enables detailed mechanistic analysis of atrial reentrant tachycardia but has yet to be used to assess circuit conduction velocity (CV) patterns in adults with congenital heart disease. Methods and Results Circuit pathways and central isthmus CVs were calculated from consecutive ultra-high-density isochronal maps at 2 tertiary centers over a 3-year period. Circuits using anatomic versus surgical obstacles were considered separately and pathway length <50th percentile identified small circuits. CV analysis was used to derive a novel index for prediction of postablation conduction block. A total of 136 supraventricular tachycardias were studied (60% intra-atrial reentrant, 14% multiple loop). Circuits with anatomic versus surgical obstacles featured longer pathway length (119 mm; interquartile range [IQR], 80-150 versus 78 mm; IQR, 63-95; <0.001), faster central isthmus CV (0.1 m/s; IQR, 0.06-0.25 versus 0.07 m/s; IQR, 0.05-0.10; =0.016), faster non-isthmus CV (0.52 m/s; IQR, 0.33-0.71 versus 0.38 m/s; IQR, 0.27-0.46; =0.009), and fewer slow isochrones (4; IQR, 2.3-6.8 versus 6; IQR 5-7; =0.008). Both central isthmus (=0.45; <0.001) and non-isthmus CV (=0.71; <0.001) correlated with pathway length, whereas central isthmus CV <0.15 m/s was ubiquitous for small circuits. Non-isthmus CV in tachycardia correlated with CV during block validation (=0.94; <0.001) and a validation map to tachycardia conduction time ratio >85% predicted isthmus block in all cases. Over >1 year of follow-up, arrhythmia-free survival was better for homogeneous CV patterns (90% versus 57%; =0.04). Conclusions Ultra-high-density mapping-guided CV analysis distinguishes atrial reentrant patterns in adults with congenital heart disease with surgical obstacles producing slower and smaller circuits. Very slow central isthmus CV may be essential for atrial tachycardia maintenance in small circuits, and non-isthmus conduction time in tachycardia appears to be useful for rapid assessment of postablation conduction block.
背景 超高密度标测可详细分析房性折返性心动过速的机制,但尚未用于评估先天性心脏病成人的环路传导速度(CV)模式。
方法和结果 在 3 年期间,在 2 个三级中心连续进行超高密度等时标测,以计算环路径路和中心峡部 CV。分别考虑使用解剖学和手术障碍的环路,将通路长度<第 50 百分位确定为小环路。CV 分析用于得出预测消融后传导阻滞的新指数。共研究了 136 例室上性心动过速(60%为房内折返性心动过速,14%为多环)。使用解剖学和手术障碍的环路具有更长的径路长度(119mm;四分位距[IQR],80-150 与 78mm;IQR,63-95;<0.001),更快的中心峡部 CV(0.1m/s;IQR,0.06-0.25 与 0.07m/s;IQR,0.05-0.10;=0.016),更快的非峡部 CV(0.52m/s;IQR,0.33-0.71 与 0.38m/s;IQR,0.27-0.46;=0.009)和更少的慢等时线(4;IQR,2.3-6.8 与 6;IQR,5-7;=0.008)。中心峡部 CV(=0.45;<0.001)和非峡部 CV(=0.71;<0.001)均与径路长度相关,而峡部 CV<0.15m/s 是小环路的普遍特征。心动过速时的非峡部 CV 与验证时的 CV (=0.94;<0.001)和验证图至心动过速传导时间比>85%预测峡部阻滞具有相关性。在超过 1 年的随访中,具有均匀 CV 模式的心律失常无复发生存更好(90%与 57%;=0.04)。
结论 超高密度标测指导的 CV 分析可区分先天性心脏病成人的房性折返性心动过速模式,具有手术障碍的患者产生更慢和更小的环路。非常慢的中心峡部 CV 可能是小环路中维持房性心动过速所必需的,心动过速时的非峡部传导时间似乎可用于快速评估消融后传导阻滞。