Senbursa Gamze, Pekyavas Nihan Ozunlu, Baltaci Gul
Anima Rapha Center of Manual Therapy and Reflexology, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Korean J Fam Med. 2021 Mar;42(2):96-106. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.20.0025. Epub 2020 May 22.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation approaches in individuals with low back pain (LBP) on pain, spinal mobility, disability, and muscular strength.
Ninety volunteers were included and divided into four groups depending on the rehabilitation approach: group 1, soft tissue mobilization techniques and stabilization exercises (n=24; 11 females [F], 13 males [M]); group 2, Kinesio Taping and stabilization exercises (n=24; 12F, 12M); group 3, stabilization exercises (n=22; 11F, 11M); and group 4, reflex therapy and stabilization exercises (n=20; 10F, 10M). Visual Analog Scale for pain intensity, an isokinetic evaluation for strength at 60°/s and a side-plank position test for trunk stabilization were measured before and assessed at the beginning, after a 4-week treatment and during 4 weeks of follow-up. The functional status was evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index.
Individuals in all groups showed similar decrease in pain after the treatment and at 1-month follow-up, but there were no significant differences in pain levels between the groups (P<0.05).
All therapeutic approaches were found to be effective in diminishing pain and thus helpful in increasing strength and stabilization in patients with LBP.
本研究的目的是比较针对下腰痛(LBP)患者的康复方法在疼痛、脊柱活动度、功能障碍和肌肉力量方面的效果。
纳入90名志愿者,根据康复方法将其分为四组:第1组,软组织松动术和稳定性训练(n = 24;11名女性[F],13名男性[M]);第2组,肌内效贴布和稳定性训练(n = 24;12F,12M);第3组,稳定性训练(n = 22;11F,11M);第4组,反射疗法和稳定性训练(n = 20;10F,10M)。在治疗开始前、4周治疗后以及4周随访期间,测量疼痛强度的视觉模拟量表、60°/s等速肌力评估以及躯干稳定性的侧平板支撑测试。用Oswestry功能障碍指数评估功能状态。
所有组的个体在治疗后和1个月随访时疼痛均有相似程度的减轻,但组间疼痛水平无显著差异(P < 0.05)。
所有治疗方法在减轻疼痛方面均有效,因此有助于增强LBP患者的力量和稳定性。