Suppr超能文献

血管手术后失访的预测因素及后果

Predictors and Consequences of Loss to Follow-up after Vascular Surgery.

作者信息

Khanh Linh Ngo, Helenowski Irene, Zamor Kimberly, Scott Morgan, Hoel Andrew W, Ho Karen J

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Department of Preventive Medicine and Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;68:217-225. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.04.061. Epub 2020 May 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Loss to follow-up (LTF) after surgery impacts quality of care and can adversely affect short- and long-term clinical outcomes. This study identifies modifiable factors contributing to LTF after vascular surgery and the factors' effect on short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center cohort study of 440 consecutive adult patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy, infrainguinal bypass, percutaneous lower extremity revascularization, or endovascular aortic aneurysm repair at Northwestern Memorial Hospital between November 2011 and November 2013. Twenty-six patients who died within 9 months after surgery were excluded because of competing risks with the study end points. Demographics, medical history and medications, hospitalization and procedure-related factors, and postoperative complications were collected from the medical record. The primary end point was LTF 1 month after surgery (LTF1M), defined as lack of an in-person outpatient visit with a vascular surgeon 1 month after the index procedure. Secondary outcomes were LTF 1 year after surgery (LTF1Y), defined as lack of an in-person outpatient visit with a vascular surgeon between 9 and 22 months after discharge, and overall 5-year survival.

RESULTS

Overall LTF1M and LTF1Y rates were 27.3% and 46.8%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in survival based on the LTF1M status (P = 0.72), but patients who were LTF1Y had significantly worse survival at 5 years (P < 0.001). Seeing a nonvascular surgeon specialist at our institution (odds ratio (OR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35-0.94, P = 0.03) and having a reintervention (OR 0.17, 95% CI: 0.08-0.37, P < 0.001) were associated with decreased LTF1Y in a multivariable model. Overall mortality was more likely with LTF1Y (hazard ratio (HR) 3.27, 95% CI: 1.86-5.76, P < 0.001) and less likely with seeing another specialist at our institution (HR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.20-0.75, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

LTF rates after vascular surgery are high and associated with poor long-term outcomes. Patients who did not see a nonvascular surgeon specialist at our institution had higher rates of LTF1Y and worse overall mortality, suggesting that improved integration of care can improve LTF and survival.

摘要

背景

手术后失访会影响医疗质量,并可能对短期和长期临床结果产生不利影响。本研究确定了导致血管手术后失访的可改变因素以及这些因素对短期和长期临床结果的影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性单中心队列研究,研究对象为2011年11月至2013年11月期间在西北纪念医院连续接受颈动脉内膜切除术、腹股沟下旁路移植术、经皮下肢血管重建术或血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术的440例成年患者。26例在术后9个月内死亡的患者因与研究终点存在竞争风险而被排除。从病历中收集人口统计学资料、病史和用药情况、住院及手术相关因素以及术后并发症。主要终点为术后1个月失访(LTF1M),定义为在索引手术后1个月未亲自到血管外科医生处门诊就诊。次要结局为术后1年失访(LTF1Y),定义为出院后9至22个月内未亲自到血管外科医生处门诊就诊,以及总体5年生存率。

结果

总体LTF1M和LTF1Y发生率分别为27.3%和46.8%。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,基于LTF1M状态的生存率无差异(P = 0.72),但LTF1Y的患者5年生存率显著更差(P < 0.001)。在我们机构看非血管外科专科医生(比值比(OR)0.58,95%置信区间(CI):0.35 - 0.94,P = 0.03)和再次干预(OR 0.17,95%CI:0.08 - 0.37,P < 0.001)在多变量模型中与LTF1Y降低相关。LTF1Y时总体死亡率更高(风险比(HR)3.27,95%CI:1.86 - 5.76,P < 0.001),而在我们机构看另一位专科医生时总体死亡率更低(HR 0.38,95%CI:0.20 - 0.75,P = 0.005)。

结论

血管手术后失访率很高,且与不良的长期结局相关。在我们机构未看非血管外科专科医生的患者LTF1Y发生率更高,总体死亡率更差,这表明改善医疗整合可改善失访情况和生存率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验