Suppr超能文献

破裂性复杂腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复与开放修复:倾向加权分析

Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Ruptured Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Propensity Weighted Analysis.

作者信息

Latz Christopher A, Boitano Laura T, Tanious Adam, Wang Linda J, Schwartz Samuel I, Pendleton Anna A, DeCarlo Charles, Dua Anahita, Conrad Mark F

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;68:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.04.073. Epub 2020 May 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates 30-day mortality after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open repair for ruptured complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAAs), including juxtarenal, pararenal, suprarenal, and extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) in a real-world setting.

METHODS

The Targeted Vascular Module from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify patients undergoing repair for ruptured cAAA from 2011 to 2017. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included renal failure, pulmonary complications, ischemic colitis, cardiac complications, lower extremity ischemia, post-operative rupture, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). EVAR and open repair were compared using inverse probability weights.

RESULTS

Four hundred forty-six patients had a ruptured cAAA repair during the study years; 105 (23.7%) were repaired via EVAR and 338 (76.3%) received open repair. The distribution by aneurysm type was as follows: 253 juxtarenal (57.1%), 59 pararenal (13.3%), and 100 suprarenal (22.6%) AAA with 31 type IV TAAA (7.0%). Juxtarenal aneurysms were more likely to be performed open than EVAR (P < 0.001) and pararenal were more likely to be performed endovascularly (P < 0.001). There was no significant change in the proportion of EVAR versus open repair in the years evaluated (P = 0.16). Hemodynamic stability was nearly identical between the 2 groups, with 49.5% of the EVAR cohort suffering from preoperative hypotension or requiring vasopressors compared to 49.1% in the open surgical cohort (P = 1.0). No significant difference in death existed based on proximal aneurysmal extent (P = 0.42). Death within 30 days occurred in 135 (30.5%) of the total cohort with 25 (23.8%) deaths in the EVAR cohort and 110 (32.5%) deaths in the open cohort. The EVAR group suffered a 20.0% rate of postoperative renal failure requiring dialysis compared to 18.6% of the open cohort (P = 0.78). Pulmonary complications were more common after open repair (40.5% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.004). After propensity weighting and weighted logistic regression, the open cohort had 1.75 times the odds of death compared to the EVAR cohort (AOR: 1.8, 95% CI: 0.9-2.8; P = 0.06). There was no association between repair type and postoperative renal failure. Open repair was associated with greater odds of pulmonary complications, ischemic colitis, and longer ICU stays in survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality after repair for ruptured cAAA is high; and treatment with EVAR may trend toward early survival advantage. Rates of renal failure were similar between each cohort. Open repair is associated with higher rates of pulmonary complications, ischemic colitis, and longer ICU stays.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了在真实世界中,血管腔内修复术(EVAR)与开放性修复术治疗破裂性复杂性腹主动脉瘤(cAAA)(包括肾旁、肾周、肾上和IV型胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA))后的30天死亡率。

方法

查询美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划的靶向血管模块,以确定2011年至2017年期间接受破裂性cAAA修复的患者。主要终点是30天死亡率。次要终点包括肾衰竭、肺部并发症、缺血性结肠炎、心脏并发症、下肢缺血、术后破裂以及重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)。使用逆概率权重比较EVAR和开放性修复。

结果

在研究期间,446例患者接受了破裂性cAAA修复;105例(23.7%)通过EVAR修复,338例(76.3%)接受开放性修复。动脉瘤类型的分布如下:253例肾旁(57.1%)、59例肾周(13.3%)和100例肾上(22.6%)AAA,31例IV型TAAA(7.0%)。肾旁动脉瘤进行开放性修复的可能性高于EVAR(P < 0.001),肾周动脉瘤进行血管腔内修复的可能性更高(P < 0.001)。在评估的年份中,EVAR与开放性修复的比例没有显著变化(P = 0.16)。两组之间的血流动力学稳定性几乎相同,EVAR队列中有49.5%的患者术前出现低血压或需要使用血管升压药,而开放性手术队列中这一比例为49.1%(P = 1.0)。基于近端动脉瘤范围,死亡情况无显著差异(P = 0.42)。总队列中有135例(30.5%)在30天内死亡,其中EVAR队列中有25例(23.8%)死亡,开放性队列中有110例(32.5%)死亡。EVAR组术后需要透析的肾衰竭发生率为20.0%,而开放性队列中这一比例为18.6%(P = 0.78)。开放性修复后肺部并发症更常见(40.5%对25.0%,P = 0.004)。经过倾向评分加权和加权逻辑回归分析,开放性队列死亡的几率是EVAR队列的1.75倍(调整后比值比:1.8,95%置信区间:0.9 - 2.8;P = 0.06)。修复类型与术后肾衰竭之间没有关联。开放性修复与肺部并发症、缺血性结肠炎的几率更高以及幸存者在ICU的住院时间更长有关。

结论

破裂性cAAA修复后的死亡率很高;EVAR治疗可能具有早期生存优势。每个队列中的肾衰竭发生率相似。开放性修复与更高的肺部并发症、缺血性结肠炎发生率以及更长的ICU住院时间有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验