Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Division of Emergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa.
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 May;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000946.
In South Africa (SA), prehospital emergency care is delivered by emergency medical services (EMS) across the country. Within these services, quality systems are in their infancy, and issues regarding transparency, reliability and contextual relevance have been cited as common concerns, exacerbated by poor communication, and ineffective leadership. As a result, we undertook a study to assess the current state of quality systems in EMS in SA, so as to determine priorities for initial focus regarding their development.
A multiple exploratory case study design was used that employed the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's 18-point Quality Program Assessment Tool as both a formative assessment and semistructured interview guide using four provincial government EMS and one national private service.
Services generally scored higher for and and were found to be more dependent on utilisation and perceived mandate. There was a relatively strong focus on clinical quality assessment within the private service, whereas in the provincial systems, measures were exclusively restricted to call times with little focus on clinical care. and were generally among the lowest scores. A multitude of contextual factors were identified that affected the effectiveness of quality systems, centred around leadership, vision and mission, and quality system infrastructure and capacity, guided by the need for comprehensive yet pragmatic strategic policies and standards.
Understanding and accounting for these factors will be key to ensuring both successful implementation and ongoing utilisation of healthcare quality systems in emergency care. The result will not only provide a more efficient and effective service, but also positively impact patient safety and quality of care of the services delivered.
在南非(SA),全国各地的紧急医疗服务(EMS)提供了院前急救护理。在这些服务中,质量体系还处于起步阶段,透明度、可靠性和背景相关性等问题已被列为常见问题,沟通不畅和领导不力使问题更加严重。因此,我们进行了一项研究,以评估南非 EMS 中质量体系的现状,从而确定发展的初步重点。
采用多案例探索性研究设计,使用了美国医疗机构改进研究所的 18 点质量方案评估工具作为形成性评估和半结构化访谈指南,涉及四个省级政府 EMS 和一个国家私营服务。
服务机构在 和 方面的得分普遍较高,而 和 则更多地依赖使用率和感知任务。私营服务机构内相对更加注重临床质量评估,而在省级系统中,评估仅限于通话时间,很少关注临床护理。 和 通常得分较低。确定了许多影响质量体系有效性的背景因素,这些因素以领导力、愿景和使命为中心,并以全面而务实的战略政策和标准为指导,涉及质量体系基础设施和能力。
了解和考虑这些因素将是确保医疗保健质量体系在紧急护理中成功实施和持续利用的关键。这不仅将提供更高效和有效的服务,还将积极影响患者安全和所提供服务的护理质量。