Suppr超能文献

现实主义重要吗?一项比较医学生缝合教育模型的随机对照试验。

Does Realism Matter? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Models for Medical Student Suture Education.

作者信息

Blau Jared A, Shammas Ronnie L, Anolik Rachel A, Avashia Yash J, Krucoff Kate B, Zenn Michael R

机构信息

Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, N.C.

Zenn Plastic Surgery, Raleigh, N.C.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Apr 22;8(4):e2738. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002738. eCollection 2020 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that medical students trained in suturing using high-fidelity models (cadaveric tissue) would demonstrate greater proficiency when compared with those trained using low-fidelity models (synthetic tissue).

METHODS

Forty-three medical students were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of students taught to perform simple interrupted sutures using synthetic tissue, and group 2 consisted of those taught using human cadaveric tissue. Suturing proficiency was measured pre- and postinstruction using the Global Rating Scale and by measuring suture accuracy. Perceived confidence in suturing was measured on a scale of 0-100.

RESULTS

Perceived confidence was measured as an average of 8.26 out of 100 pretraining and significantly improved after training (56.91 out of 100); however, there was no significant difference when comparing confidence between groups posttraining (57.65 cadaveric versus 56.05 synthetic; = 0.78), nor in the measured confidence change pre- and posttraining ( = 0.53). Posttraining, participants displayed a significant improvement in the number of adequately placed sutures; however, there was no significant difference posttraining when comparing groups (2.43 cadaveric versus 2.75 synthetic; = 0.48). The change in adequate suture placement pre- and posttraining did not reach statistical significance between groups ( = 0.27). After instruction, participants demonstrated a significant improvement in total suture performance scores; however, there was no significant difference when comparing groups (30.04 cadaveric versus 29.80 synthetic; = 0.90), nor in the total change pre- and posttraining ( = 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Training medium fidelity (tissue versus synthetic) does not significantly influence a student's overall suturing performance. However, formal instruction significantly improves objective competence and perceived confidence. Regardless of the model, surgical departments should emphasize medical student exposure to basic surgical skills education.

摘要

背景

我们假设,与使用低保真模型(合成组织)训练的医学生相比,使用高保真模型(尸体组织)训练的医学生在缝合操作上会表现出更高的熟练度。

方法

43名医学生被随机分为两组。第1组学生学习使用合成组织进行单纯间断缝合,第2组学生学习使用人体尸体组织进行缝合。在教学前后,使用全球评分量表并通过测量缝合准确性来评估缝合熟练度。使用0至100分的量表来衡量对缝合的感知信心。

结果

训练前感知信心的平均得分为100分中的8.26分,训练后显著提高(100分中的56.91分);然而,训练后两组之间的信心比较没有显著差异(尸体组织组为57.65分,合成组织组为56.05分;P = 0.78),训练前后测量的信心变化也没有显著差异(P = 0.53)。训练后,参与者在放置合适的缝合线数量上有显著改善;然而,训练后两组之间比较没有显著差异(尸体组织组为2.43,合成组织组为2.75;P = 0.48)。训练前后合适缝合线放置的变化在两组之间未达到统计学显著性(P = 0.27)。教学后,参与者在总缝合表现分数上有显著改善;然而,两组之间比较没有显著差异(尸体组织组为30.04,合成组织组为29.80;P = 0.90),训练前后的总变化也没有显著差异(P = 0.74)。

结论

训练媒介的保真度(组织与合成组织)对学生的整体缝合表现没有显著影响。然而,正规教学显著提高了客观能力和感知信心。无论使用何种模型,外科科室都应强调让医学生接受基本外科技能教育。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab1/7209846/d6b978404550/gox-8-e2738-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验