Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Nov 2;189(11):1342-1347. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa091.
It has been suggested that the association between self-reported occupational noise exposure and vestibular schwannoma (VS), found in several studies, represents recall bias. Therefore, we aimed to study the relationship in a large case-control study using occupational noise measurements. We performed a case-control study using data from Sweden for 1,913 VS cases diagnosed in 1961-2009 and 9,566 age- and sex-matched population controls. We defined occupational history by linkage to national censuses from 1960, 1970, 1980, and 1990. We estimated occupational noise exposure for each case and control using a job-exposure matrix. There was no association between occupational noise exposure and VS. Among subjects assessed as ever exposed to occupational noise levels of ≥85 dB (214 cases and 1,142 controls), the odds ratio for VS per 5 years of exposure was 1.02 (95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.17). Workers with noise levels of ≥85 dB for at least 15 years (5-year latency period), showed no increased risk of VS (odds ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.73, 1.31) compared with those who had never been exposed to noise levels of 75 dB or higher. In summary, our large study does not support an association between occupational noise exposure and VS.
有人认为,几项研究中发现的职业噪声暴露与前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)之间的关联代表了回忆偏倚。因此,我们旨在使用职业噪声测量值在一项大型病例对照研究中研究这种关系。我们使用瑞典的数据进行了一项病例对照研究,该研究纳入了 1961-2009 年间诊断出的 1913 例 VS 病例和 9566 名年龄和性别匹配的人群对照。我们通过与 1960 年、1970 年、1980 年和 1990 年的全国人口普查相联系来定义职业史。我们使用职业暴露矩阵来估计每个病例和对照的职业噪声暴露情况。职业噪声暴露与 VS 之间没有关联。在评估为曾接触过≥85dB(214 例病例和 1142 例对照)职业噪声水平的人群中,VS 的每 5 年暴露比值比为 1.02(95%置信区间:0.90,1.17)。对于噪声水平≥85dB 的工人(5 年潜伏期),与从未接触过 75dB 或更高噪声水平的工人相比,VS 的风险没有增加(比值比=0.98,95%置信区间:0.73,1.31)。总之,我们的大型研究不支持职业噪声暴露与 VS 之间存在关联。