Suppr超能文献

钛基基台对种植体周围软组织炎症参数和边缘骨丧失的影响:一项随机临床试验。

The influence of titanium base abutments on peri-implant soft tissue inflammatory parameters and marginal bone loss: A randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Post-Graduate Program of Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina, Tubarão, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Department of Pediatrics Dentistry, Orthodontics, and Public Health, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru Campus, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Aug;22(4):542-548. doi: 10.1111/cid.12900. Epub 2020 May 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some techniques in implant dentistry have been suggested that may potentially alter peri-implant soft and hard tissue parameters.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the peri-implant soft tissue inflammatory parameters and crestal bone loss around titanium base abutments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty two implants were placed in 21 patients and restored by single crowns. Subjects were randomly allocated into two groups: cement-retained abutment (n = 24) and titanium base (n = 28). Peri-implant probing depth, and mesial and distal marginal bone loss (MBL) were evaluated at implant loading (T1), 6 and 12 months (T2 and T3, respectively). Peri-implant bleeding-on-probing was evaluated at T2 and T3. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, Tukey test, Man Whitney, and Pearson correlation were performed for statistical analysis at P < .05.

RESULTS

The mean difference of peri-implant MBL from implant installation to 12 months in function was 1.15 ± 0.82 mm for the cement-retained group, and 1.23 ± 0.79 mm for the titanium base group. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups for clinical and radiographic peri-implant evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Titanium base abutments present no negative effect on peri-implant soft tissue and MBL. When used to support single crowns, both approaches performed likewise regarding clinical and radiographic parameters.

摘要

背景

一些种植体牙科技术可能会改变种植体周围软硬组织的参数。

目的

评估钛基基台周围种植体软组织炎症参数和牙槽骨嵴吸收情况。

材料和方法

将 52 个种植体植入 21 名患者中,并通过单冠修复。将受试者随机分为两组:粘结固位基台组(n = 24)和钛基组(n = 28)。在种植体负载时(T1)、6 个月(T2)和 12 个月(T3)评估种植体探诊深度、近远中边缘骨丧失(MBL)。在 T2 和 T3 评估种植体探诊出血。采用双向重复测量方差分析、Tukey 检验、Man Whitney 和 Pearson 相关性分析进行统计学分析,P<.05。

结果

在功能方面,从种植体安装到 12 个月,粘结固位基台组的种植体周围 MBL 平均差值为 1.15±0.82mm,钛基组为 1.23±0.79mm。两组在临床和影像学种植体评估方面无统计学差异。

结论

钛基基台对种植体周围软组织和 MBL 无不良影响。当用于支持单冠时,两种方法在临床和影像学参数方面表现相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验