Post-Graduate Program of Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina, Tubarão, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Department of Pediatrics Dentistry, Orthodontics, and Public Health, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru Campus, São Paulo, Brazil.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Aug;22(4):542-548. doi: 10.1111/cid.12900. Epub 2020 May 22.
Some techniques in implant dentistry have been suggested that may potentially alter peri-implant soft and hard tissue parameters.
To evaluate the peri-implant soft tissue inflammatory parameters and crestal bone loss around titanium base abutments.
Fifty two implants were placed in 21 patients and restored by single crowns. Subjects were randomly allocated into two groups: cement-retained abutment (n = 24) and titanium base (n = 28). Peri-implant probing depth, and mesial and distal marginal bone loss (MBL) were evaluated at implant loading (T1), 6 and 12 months (T2 and T3, respectively). Peri-implant bleeding-on-probing was evaluated at T2 and T3. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, Tukey test, Man Whitney, and Pearson correlation were performed for statistical analysis at P < .05.
The mean difference of peri-implant MBL from implant installation to 12 months in function was 1.15 ± 0.82 mm for the cement-retained group, and 1.23 ± 0.79 mm for the titanium base group. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups for clinical and radiographic peri-implant evaluation.
Titanium base abutments present no negative effect on peri-implant soft tissue and MBL. When used to support single crowns, both approaches performed likewise regarding clinical and radiographic parameters.
一些种植体牙科技术可能会改变种植体周围软硬组织的参数。
评估钛基基台周围种植体软组织炎症参数和牙槽骨嵴吸收情况。
将 52 个种植体植入 21 名患者中,并通过单冠修复。将受试者随机分为两组:粘结固位基台组(n = 24)和钛基组(n = 28)。在种植体负载时(T1)、6 个月(T2)和 12 个月(T3)评估种植体探诊深度、近远中边缘骨丧失(MBL)。在 T2 和 T3 评估种植体探诊出血。采用双向重复测量方差分析、Tukey 检验、Man Whitney 和 Pearson 相关性分析进行统计学分析,P<.05。
在功能方面,从种植体安装到 12 个月,粘结固位基台组的种植体周围 MBL 平均差值为 1.15±0.82mm,钛基组为 1.23±0.79mm。两组在临床和影像学种植体评估方面无统计学差异。
钛基基台对种植体周围软组织和 MBL 无不良影响。当用于支持单冠时,两种方法在临床和影像学参数方面表现相似。