• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Beyond the Apnea Test: An Argument to Broaden the Requirement for Consent to the Entire Brain Death Evaluation.

作者信息

Paquette Erin, Frader Joel, Shah Seema, C Tasker Robert, Truog Robert

机构信息

Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago.

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):17-19. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754523.

DOI:10.1080/15265161.2020.1754523
PMID:32441597
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Beyond the Apnea Test: An Argument to Broaden the Requirement for Consent to the Entire Brain Death Evaluation.超越呼吸暂停测试：关于扩大对整个脑死亡评估同意要求的争论
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):17-19. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754523.
2
POINT: Should Informed Consent Be Required for Apnea Testing in Patients With Suspected Brain Death? No.观点：对于疑似脑死亡患者的呼吸暂停试验，是否应要求获得知情同意？不应要求。
Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):700-702. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.030. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
3
COUNTERPOINT: Should Informed Consent Be Required for Apnea Testing in Patients With Suspected Brain Death? Yes.反驳观点：对于疑似脑死亡患者的呼吸暂停测试，是否应该要求获得知情同意？应该。
Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):702-704. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.032. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
4
The Apnea Test: Requiring Consent for a Test That is a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, Not Fit for Purpose, and Always Confounded?呼吸暂停测试：一项自我实现预言、不适用且总是混淆不清的测试，却需要获得同意？
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):42-44. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754504.
5
Informed Consent Should Not Be Required for Apnea Testing and Arguing It Should Misses the Point.进行呼吸暂停测试不应要求获得知情同意，认为应该要求获得知情同意是没有抓住要点。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):25-27. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754517.
6
Can't Hit Pause? On the Constitutive Elements of Responsible Ventilator Management & the Apnea Test.
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):35-37. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754513.
7
The Case Against Solicitation of Consent for Apnea Testing.反对为呼吸暂停测试征求同意的理由。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):20-22. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754512.
8
Requiring Consent for Brain-Death Testing: A Perilous Proposal.脑死亡检测需征得同意：一项危险的提议。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):28-30. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754515.
9
Response to Open Peer Commentaries "Rethinking the Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Foundations of Informed Consent and Shared Decision-Making for Brain Death Determination".对开放同行评论《重新思考脑死亡判定中知情同意和共同决策的伦理、法律及临床基础》的回应
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):W1-W5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1762796.
10
Informed Consent for Apnea Testing: Meeting the Standard of Care.呼吸暂停测试的知情同意：符合医疗护理标准
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):49-51. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754520.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain death: Controversies and reappraisals.脑死亡：争议与重新评估
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2024 Jun 12;23(1):e0168. doi: 10.1097/CLD.0000000000000168. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
2
Apnea Test: The Family in the Room.呼吸暂停测试：家属在场
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Aug;41(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01906-y. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
3
Should the Brain Death Exam With Apnea Test Require Surrogate Informed Consent? Yes: The UDDA Revision Series.脑死亡检查中的 apnea 测试是否需要代理人知情同意？答案是肯定的：《统一死亡判定法案》修订系列。
Neurology. 2023 Aug 1;101(5):218-220. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207343. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
4
Challenges to Brain Death in Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act: The UDDA Revision Series.修订《统一死亡判定法案》中脑死亡面临的挑战：《统一死亡判定法案》修订系列
Neurology. 2023 Jul 4;101(1):30-37. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207334.
5
Consent for determination of death by neurologic criteria in Canada: an analysis of legal and ethical authorities, and consensus-based working group recommendations.加拿大通过神经标准确定死亡的同意：法律和伦理权威分析，以及基于共识的工作组建议。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;70(4):570-584. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02430-5. Epub 2023 May 2.
6
Pediatric Intensivist and Pediatric Neurologist Perspectives and Practices on Death by Neurologic Criteria.儿科重症监护医生和儿科神经科医生对神经学标准死亡的观点和实践。
J Clin Ethics. 2021 Fall;32(3):195-205.