• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与者报告了一个关于失语症康复中言语治疗师社会参与的实践共同体的结果。

Participant reported outcomes of a community of practice about social participation for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation.

机构信息

School of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jan;44(2):231-242. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1764116. Epub 2020 May 22.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2020.1764116
PMID:32441986
Abstract

PURPOSE

Because of their communication difficulties, persons with aphasia are at risk of not fully participating in significant activities after rehabilitation. Speech-language pathologists can contribute to support optimal social participation in rehabilitation. A community of practice (CoP) was designed to provide motivated clinicians with opportunities to acquire knowledge and reflect on social participation within aphasia rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to describe the outcomes of this CoP according to the perspectives of speech-language pathologist participants.

METHODS

Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted 4 to 10 weeks after the end of the CoP with 13 speech-language pathologist participants. Analyses were guided by grounded theory.

RESULTS

Participants perceived that the CoP experience contributed to a better alignment of their practice with the ideal end purpose of optimizing social participation. A sense of community emerged among CoP members, who collectively reflected on their practice. Participants stated feeling equipped to adopt new practices, adopting new practices for optimizing social participation, and/or advocating for better services for persons with aphasia. They felt increased confidence, motivation, well-being, and/or energy towards their practice.

CONCLUSIONS

CoPs can help speech-language pathologists to more confidently practice with the goal of optimizing the social participation of persons with aphasia.Implications for rehabilitationSpeech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation, as a result of being involved in a community of practice (CoP) about social participation, may offer more evidence-based services aiming at optimizing the social participation of persons with aphasia.Markers of a successful CoP may include participants' increased feelings of confidence, motivation, well-being, and/or energy towards their practice.CoPs can be used for continuing education purposes and support the development of clinical expertise among professionals, such as speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation.

摘要

目的

由于沟通困难,失语症患者在康复后可能无法充分参与重要活动。言语治疗师可以为支持康复中的最佳社会参与做出贡献。实践社区(CoP)旨在为有动力的临床医生提供机会,以获取有关失语症康复中社会参与的知识并进行反思。本研究的目的是根据言语治疗师参与者的观点描述该 CoP 的结果。

方法

在 CoP 结束后 4 至 10 周,对 13 名言语治疗师参与者进行了半结构化的个人访谈。分析受扎根理论的指导。

结果

参与者认为 CoP 经历有助于更好地将他们的实践与优化社会参与的理想最终目的保持一致。CoP 成员之间形成了一种社区感,共同反思他们的实践。参与者表示,他们有能力采用新的实践方法,采用新的实践方法来优化社会参与,以及/或倡导为失语症患者提供更好的服务。他们对自己的实践感到更加自信、有动力、更幸福和/或更有活力。

结论

CoP 可以帮助言语治疗师更自信地实践,以优化失语症患者的社会参与。对康复的影响:参与社会参与实践社区(CoP)的失语症康复言语治疗师可能会提供更多以证据为基础的服务,旨在优化失语症患者的社会参与。成功 CoP 的标志可能包括参与者对自己的实践更有信心、更有动力、更幸福和/或更有活力。CoP 可用于继续教育目的,并支持失语症康复等专业人员的临床专业知识发展。

相似文献

1
Participant reported outcomes of a community of practice about social participation for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation.参与者报告了一个关于失语症康复中言语治疗师社会参与的实践共同体的结果。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jan;44(2):231-242. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1764116. Epub 2020 May 22.
2
Evaluation of a community of practice for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a logic analysis.对失语症康复中言语语言病理学家实践共同体的评估:逻辑分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4338-0.
3
Exploring speech-language pathologists' perspectives about living successfully with aphasia.探索言语语言病理学家对失语症患者成功生活的看法。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 May-Jun;46(3):300-11. doi: 10.3109/13682822.2010.496762.
4
What do speech-language pathologists describe as most important when trying to achieve client participation during aphasia rehabilitation? A qualitative focus group interview study.言语语言病理学家在试图让失语症患者在康复过程中积极参与时,认为什么是最重要的?一项定性焦点小组访谈研究。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Oct;21(5):493-503. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1413134. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
5
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists' practice?满足失语症指南建议的障碍和促进因素:哪些因素影响言语病理学家的实践?
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jun;41(13):1596-1607. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1432706. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
6
Prognostication in post-stroke aphasia: How do speech pathologists formulate and deliver information about recovery?卒中后失语症的预后:言语病理学家如何制定和传达关于恢复的信息?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 Jul;55(4):520-536. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12534. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
7
Speech pathologists' experience of involving people with stroke-induced aphasia in clinical decision making during rehabilitation.言语病理学家让中风后失语症患者参与康复临床决策的经验。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(9):870-8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1066453. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
8
Current Australian speech-language pathology practice in addressing psychological well-being in people with aphasia after stroke.澳大利亚目前针对中风后失语症患者心理健康问题的言语病理学实践。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Jun;17(3):252-62. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1024170. Epub 2015 May 4.
9
"There are endless areas that they can use it for": speech-language pathologist perspectives of technology support for aphasia self-management.“他们可以在无数领域使用它”:言语语言病理学家对失语症自我管理的技术支持的观点。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Nov;18(8):1473-1488. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2037758. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
10
Qualitative Exploration of Speech Pathologists' Experiences and Priorities for Aphasia Service Design: Initial Stage of an Experience-Based Co-Design Project to Improve Aphasia Services.定性探索言语治疗师在失语症服务设计方面的经验和重点:基于经验的共同设计项目改善失语症服务的初始阶段。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14105. doi: 10.1111/hex.14105.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards aphasia among healthcare workers in Anhui, China: a cross-sectional survey.中国安徽医护人员对失语症的认知、态度和实践:一项横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):615. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12790-x.
2
Experiences of acquired brain injury one-month post-discharge from acute hospitalisation.急性住院出院后一个月的获得性脑损伤经历。
Afr J Disabil. 2023 Feb 28;12:1037. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1037. eCollection 2023.
3
Perspectives of working-age adults with aphasia regarding social participation.
失语症成年劳动者对社会参与的看法。
Afr J Disabil. 2020 Dec 15;9:713. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v9i0.713. eCollection 2020.