Berg Karianne, Askim Torunn, Rise Marit By
Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim , Norway and.
Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim , Norway.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Oct;21(5):493-503. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1413134. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
: The aim of this study was to investigate what speech-language pathologists describe as most important when trying to achieve client-oriented participation during aphasia rehabilitation. : A qualitative study including semi-structured focus group interviews with 11 speech-language pathologists. Interviews were analysed with the use of systematic text condensation. : Four main themes emerged from the analysis. (1) It is important to take the vulnerability of the client group into account. (2) It is important to address the client's process of realisation by navigating around unrealistic wishes and goals. (3) It is challenging to involve clients when the evidence-base for clinical practice is limited. (4) It is crucial to make therapy meaningful to the client. : This study showed that speech-language pathologists perceived prediction of a clinical course in aphasia rehabilitation as challenging due to the vulnerable client group and the perceived need to guide the clients through the rehabilitation process. They talked about how unrealistic client goals, and the lack of a solid evidence-base to guide their clinical practice, made collaborative goal setting and treatment planning challenging. Due to these barriers, the speech-language pathologists struggled to achieve client participation, and thereby aphasia rehabilitation could not be described as fully client-oriented.
本研究的目的是调查言语语言病理学家在失语症康复过程中努力实现以患者为导向的参与时所认为的最重要的因素。
一项定性研究,包括对11名言语语言病理学家进行半结构化焦点小组访谈。访谈采用系统文本浓缩法进行分析。
分析得出四个主要主题。(1)考虑患者群体的脆弱性很重要。(2)通过应对不切实际的愿望和目标来处理患者的认知过程很重要。(3)当临床实践的证据基础有限时,让患者参与具有挑战性。(4)使治疗对患者有意义至关重要。
这项研究表明,由于患者群体的脆弱性以及认为需要在康复过程中指导患者,言语语言病理学家认为预测失语症康复的临床过程具有挑战性。他们谈到了患者不切实际的目标以及缺乏坚实的证据基础来指导他们的临床实践如何使共同目标设定和治疗计划具有挑战性。由于这些障碍,言语语言病理学家难以实现患者的参与,因此失语症康复不能被描述为完全以患者为导向。