• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

言语语言病理学家在试图让失语症患者在康复过程中积极参与时,认为什么是最重要的?一项定性焦点小组访谈研究。

What do speech-language pathologists describe as most important when trying to achieve client participation during aphasia rehabilitation? A qualitative focus group interview study.

作者信息

Berg Karianne, Askim Torunn, Rise Marit By

机构信息

Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim , Norway and.

Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim , Norway.

出版信息

Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Oct;21(5):493-503. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1413134. Epub 2017 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1080/17549507.2017.1413134
PMID:29252012
Abstract

: The aim of this study was to investigate what speech-language pathologists describe as most important when trying to achieve client-oriented participation during aphasia rehabilitation. : A qualitative study including semi-structured focus group interviews with 11 speech-language pathologists. Interviews were analysed with the use of systematic text condensation. : Four main themes emerged from the analysis. (1) It is important to take the vulnerability of the client group into account. (2) It is important to address the client's process of realisation by navigating around unrealistic wishes and goals. (3) It is challenging to involve clients when the evidence-base for clinical practice is limited. (4) It is crucial to make therapy meaningful to the client. : This study showed that speech-language pathologists perceived prediction of a clinical course in aphasia rehabilitation as challenging due to the vulnerable client group and the perceived need to guide the clients through the rehabilitation process. They talked about how unrealistic client goals, and the lack of a solid evidence-base to guide their clinical practice, made collaborative goal setting and treatment planning challenging. Due to these barriers, the speech-language pathologists struggled to achieve client participation, and thereby aphasia rehabilitation could not be described as fully client-oriented.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查言语语言病理学家在失语症康复过程中努力实现以患者为导向的参与时所认为的最重要的因素。

一项定性研究,包括对11名言语语言病理学家进行半结构化焦点小组访谈。访谈采用系统文本浓缩法进行分析。

分析得出四个主要主题。(1)考虑患者群体的脆弱性很重要。(2)通过应对不切实际的愿望和目标来处理患者的认知过程很重要。(3)当临床实践的证据基础有限时,让患者参与具有挑战性。(4)使治疗对患者有意义至关重要。

这项研究表明,由于患者群体的脆弱性以及认为需要在康复过程中指导患者,言语语言病理学家认为预测失语症康复的临床过程具有挑战性。他们谈到了患者不切实际的目标以及缺乏坚实的证据基础来指导他们的临床实践如何使共同目标设定和治疗计划具有挑战性。由于这些障碍,言语语言病理学家难以实现患者的参与,因此失语症康复不能被描述为完全以患者为导向。

相似文献

1
What do speech-language pathologists describe as most important when trying to achieve client participation during aphasia rehabilitation? A qualitative focus group interview study.言语语言病理学家在试图让失语症患者在康复过程中积极参与时,认为什么是最重要的?一项定性焦点小组访谈研究。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Oct;21(5):493-503. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1413134. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
2
Speech pathologists' experience of involving people with stroke-induced aphasia in clinical decision making during rehabilitation.言语病理学家让中风后失语症患者参与康复临床决策的经验。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(9):870-8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1066453. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
3
"Well it has to be language-related": speech-language pathologists' goals for people with aphasia and their families.“嗯,这肯定与语言相关”:言语语言病理学家对失语症患者及其家属的目标。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Aug;13(4):317-28. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2011.584632.
4
Experiences of participation in goal setting for people with stroke-induced aphasia in Norway. A qualitative study.挪威中风后失语症患者参与目标设定的经历。一项定性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jun;39(11):1122-1130. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1185167. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
5
Exploring speech-language pathologists' perspectives about living successfully with aphasia.探索言语语言病理学家对失语症患者成功生活的看法。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 May-Jun;46(3):300-11. doi: 10.3109/13682822.2010.496762.
6
Participant reported outcomes of a community of practice about social participation for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation.参与者报告了一个关于失语症康复中言语治疗师社会参与的实践共同体的结果。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jan;44(2):231-242. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1764116. Epub 2020 May 22.
7
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists' practice?满足失语症指南建议的障碍和促进因素:哪些因素影响言语病理学家的实践?
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jun;41(13):1596-1607. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1432706. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
8
The seven habits of highly effective aphasia therapists: The perspective of people living with aphasia.高效失语症治疗师的七个习惯:失语症患者的视角
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Oct;21(5):438-447. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2019.1660804. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Current Australian speech-language pathology practice in addressing psychological well-being in people with aphasia after stroke.澳大利亚目前针对中风后失语症患者心理健康问题的言语病理学实践。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Jun;17(3):252-62. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1024170. Epub 2015 May 4.
10
Prognostication in post-stroke aphasia: How do speech pathologists formulate and deliver information about recovery?卒中后失语症的预后:言语病理学家如何制定和传达关于恢复的信息?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 Jul;55(4):520-536. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12534. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploration of collaborative goal setting in occupational therapy for adults with aphasia.失语症成年患者职业治疗中协作目标设定的探索
Br J Occup Ther. 2025 Jan;88(1):45-53. doi: 10.1177/03080226241278087. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
2
The core components of clinical planning for Comprehensive, High-dose Aphasia Treatment (CHAT): A task analysis.综合大剂量失语症治疗(CHAT)临床规划的核心组成部分:一项任务分析。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Mar-Apr;60(2):e70021. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70021.
3
'A Meaningful Difference, but Not Ultimately the Difference I Would Want': A Mixed-Methods Approach to Explore and Benchmark Clinically Meaningful Changes in Aphasia Recovery.
“有意义的差异,但不是我想要的最终差异”:一种混合方法,旨在探索和基准化失语症康复中的临床有意义的变化。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14169. doi: 10.1111/hex.14169.
4
Person-centered care for people with aphasia: tools for shared decision-making.以患者为中心的失语症患者护理:共同决策工具
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Oct 20;4:1236534. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1236534. eCollection 2023.
5
"Fluctuation is the norm": Rehabilitation practitioner perspectives on ambiguity and uncertainty in their work with persons in disordered states of consciousness after traumatic brain injury.“波动是常态”:创伤性脑损伤后处于意识障碍状态的患者的康复从业者对其工作中的模糊性和不确定性的看法。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 21;17(4):e0267194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267194. eCollection 2022.