Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; College of Medicine, State University of New York at Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep;217:252-260. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 May 20.
To determine whether there are differences in the prevalence of intraretinal pigment migration (IPM) across ages and genetic causes of inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs).
Retrospective cohort study.
Patients were evaluated at a single tertiary referral center. All patients with a clinical diagnosis of IRD and confirmatory genetic testing were included in these analyses. A total of 392 patients fit inclusion criteria, and 151 patients were excluded based on inconclusive genetic testing. Patients were placed into 3 groups, ciliary and ciliary-related photoreceptor, nonciliary photoreceptor, and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), based on the cellular expression of the gene and the primary affected cell type. The presence of IPM was evaluated by using slit lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and wide-field color fundus photography.
IPM was seen in 257 of 339 patients (75.8%) with mutations in photoreceptor-specific genes and in 18 of 53 patients (34.0%) with mutations in RPE-specific genes (P < .0001). Pairwise analysis following stratification by age and gene category suggested significant differences at all age groups between patients with mutations in photoreceptor-specific genes and patients with mutations in RPE-specific genes (P < .05). A fitted multivariate logistic regression model was produced and demonstrated that the incidence of IPM increases as a function of both age and gene category.
IPM is a finding more commonly observed in IRDs caused by mutations in photoreceptor-specific genes than RPE-specific genes. The absence of IPM does not always rule out IRD and should raise suspicion for disease mutations in RPE-specific genes.
确定视网膜内色素迁移(IPM)在不同年龄和遗传性视网膜疾病(IRDs)的遗传原因之间的发生率是否存在差异。
回顾性队列研究。
在一家三级转诊中心对患者进行评估。将所有具有 IRD 临床诊断和证实的基因检测结果的患者纳入这些分析。共有 392 名患者符合纳入标准,151 名患者因基因检测结果不确定而被排除在外。根据基因的细胞表达和主要受影响的细胞类型,将患者分为 3 组:睫状和睫状相关光感受器、非睫状光感受器和视网膜色素上皮(RPE)。通过裂隙灯生物显微镜、间接检眼镜和宽视野彩色眼底照相评估 IPM 的存在。
在 339 名具有光感受器特异性基因突变的患者中有 257 名(75.8%)和 53 名具有 RPE 特异性基因突变的患者中有 18 名(34.0%)观察到 IPM(P<.0001)。按年龄和基因类别分层后进行的两两分析表明,在所有年龄组中,具有光感受器特异性基因突变的患者与具有 RPE 特异性基因突变的患者之间存在显著差异(P<.05)。生成了一个拟合的多变量逻辑回归模型,该模型表明,随着年龄和基因类别的增加,IPM 的发生率也会增加。
与 RPE 特异性基因突变相比,IPM 在由光感受器特异性基因突变引起的 IRD 中更为常见。IPM 的缺失并不总是排除 IRD 的存在,应怀疑 RPE 特异性基因突变引起的疾病。