Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
AIDS Behav. 2020 Dec;24(12):3501-3510. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02928-9.
Recent increases in the availability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) internationally have widened the range of HIV prevention strategies available to gay and bisexual men. This paper aimed to quantify the use of different risk reduction strategies and compare characteristics of men who rarely use any strategies with those who regularly use condoms or PrEP. Using national cross-sectional data from the Gay Community Periodic Surveys in Australia, comparisons were made between regular condom users (37.1% of participants), PrEP users (50.1%), and men who infrequently used any risk reduction strategies (12.8%). The proportion of gay and bisexual men reporting infrequent use of HIV risk reduction strategies has decreased in recent years. These men reported less frequent high-risk sexual practices than PrEP users and also reported less recent HIV testing than either PrEP or condom users. Men who infrequently use HIV risk reduction strategies should be encouraged to test for HIV more regularly and to utilise prevention strategies that align with their infrequent high-risk behaviour.
近年来,国际上可获得的暴露前预防(PrEP)有所增加,扩大了可供男同性恋和双性恋者使用的艾滋病毒预防策略的范围。本文旨在量化不同的减少风险策略的使用情况,并比较很少使用任何策略的男性与经常使用避孕套或 PrEP 的男性的特征。利用澳大利亚同性恋社区定期调查的全国横断面数据,对经常使用避孕套的男性(参与者的 37.1%)、PrEP 使用者(50.1%)和很少使用任何风险降低策略的男性(12.8%)进行了比较。近年来,报告很少使用艾滋病毒降低风险策略的男同性恋和双性恋男性的比例有所下降。这些男性报告的高危性行为频率低于 PrEP 用户,并且报告的最近艾滋病毒检测频率也低于 PrEP 或避孕套用户。应鼓励很少使用艾滋病毒降低风险策略的男性更定期地进行艾滋病毒检测,并利用与他们偶尔的高危行为相符的预防策略。