• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缝线固定与自固定网片修补开放型腹股沟疝:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。

Suture fixation versus self-gripping mesh for open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK.

Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West, Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2480-2492. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07658-6. Epub 2020 May 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-020-07658-6
PMID:32444971
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Morbidity following open inguinal hernia repair is mainly related to chronic pain. ProGrip™ is a self-gripping mesh which aims to reduce rates of chronic pain. The aim of this study is to perform an update meta-analysis to consolidate the non-superiority hypothesis in terms of postoperative pain and recurrence and perform a trial sequential analysis.

METHODS

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) method. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pain and secondary outcomes were recurrence, operative time, wound complications, length of stay, re-operation rate, and cost. Trial sequential analysis was performed.

RESULTS

There were 14 studies included in the quantitative analysis with 3180 patients randomised to self-gripping mesh (1585) or standard mesh (1595). At all follow-up time points, there was no significant difference in the rates of chronic pain between the self-gripping and standard mesh (risk ratio, RR 1.10, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.83-1.46). There were no significant differences in recurrence rates (RR 1.13, CI 0.84-2.04). The mean operating time was significantly shorted in the ProGrip™ mesh group (MD - 7.32 min, CI - 10.21 to - 4.44). Trial sequential analysis suggests findings are conclusive.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis has confirmed no benefit of a ProGrip™ mesh when compared to a standard sutured mesh for open inguinal hernia repair in terms of chronic pain or recurrence. No further trials are required to address this clinical question.

摘要

简介

开放式腹股沟疝修补术后的发病率主要与慢性疼痛有关。ProGrip™是一种自固定网片,旨在降低慢性疼痛的发生率。本研究旨在进行更新的荟萃分析,以巩固术后疼痛和复发方面的非优越性假设,并进行试验序贯分析。

方法

根据 PRISMA 指南进行系统的随机对照试验综述。使用 Mantel-Haenszel(M-H)方法计算合并的优势比和 95%置信区间(CI)。主要观察指标是术后疼痛,次要观察指标是复发、手术时间、伤口并发症、住院时间、再次手术率和成本。进行了试验序贯分析。

结果

共有 14 项研究纳入定量分析,3180 例患者随机分为自固定网片(1585 例)或标准网片(1595 例)。在所有随访时间点,自固定网片和标准网片的慢性疼痛发生率均无显著差异(风险比,RR 1.10,95%置信区间,CI 0.83-1.46)。复发率无显著差异(RR 1.13,CI 0.84-2.04)。ProGrip™网片组的平均手术时间明显缩短(MD - 7.32 分钟,CI - 10.21 至 - 4.44)。试验序贯分析表明结果具有结论性。

结论

本荟萃分析证实,与标准缝合网片相比,ProGrip™网片在开放式腹股沟疝修补术中,在慢性疼痛或复发方面没有优势。不需要进一步的试验来解决这个临床问题。

相似文献

1
Suture fixation versus self-gripping mesh for open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.缝线固定与自固定网片修补开放型腹股沟疝:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2480-2492. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07658-6. Epub 2020 May 22.
2
Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with suture fixation of lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair.随机临床试验比较自固定网片与缝线固定轻质聚丙烯网片在开放式腹股沟疝修补术中的应用。
Br J Surg. 2014 Oct;101(11):1373-82; discussion 1382. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9598. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
3
Meta-analysis of postoperative pain using non-sutured or sutured single-layer open mesh repair for inguinal hernia.Meta 分析使用非缝合或缝合单层开放式网片修补术治疗腹股沟疝术后疼痛。
BJS Open. 2019 Feb 27;3(3):260-273. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50139. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
Self-gripping versus sutured mesh for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature.自固定补片与缝合补片在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用:当前文献的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Surg Res. 2013 Dec;185(2):653-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.07.035. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
5
Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex™ ProGrip™ polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months.自固定 Parietex™ ProGrip™ 聚酯网片与轻质聚丙烯网片在开放式腹股沟疝修补术中的随机对照多中心国际临床试验:3 个月时的中期结果。
Hernia. 2012 Jun;16(3):287-94. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0900-y. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
6
Mesh fixation with glue versus suture for chronic pain and recurrence in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.在李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术中,使用胶水与缝线进行补片固定对慢性疼痛和复发的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD010814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010814.pub2.
7
Comparison of self-gripping mesh and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of long-term results.开放式腹股沟疝修补术中自固定网片与缝合网片的比较:长期结果的荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2018 Feb;163(2):351-360. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
8
A systematic review of randomised control trials assessing mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair.系统评价随机对照试验评估网片固定在开放式腹股沟疝修补术中的应用。
Hernia. 2014 Apr;18(2):165-76. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1093-8. Epub 2013 May 7.
9
Self-gripping versus sutured mesh fixation methods for open inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review of clinical trials and observational studies.开放腹股沟疝修补术中自固定与缝合补片固定方法:对临床试验和观察性研究的系统评价
Surgery. 2017 Jul;162(1):18-36. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.028. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
10
Three-year results of a randomized study comparing self-gripping mesh with sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair.一项比较自固定补片与缝合补片用于开放腹股沟疝修补术的随机研究的三年结果
J Surg Res. 2017 Mar;209:139-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Post operative pain associated with ProGrip mesh hernioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ProGrip 网片修补术与术后疼痛相关:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Nov 25;29(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03216-4.
2
Chronic inguinal pain post-hernioplasty. Laparo-endoscopic surgery vs lichtenstein repair: systematic review and meta-analysis.腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛。腹腔镜手术与李金斯坦修补术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1427-1439. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03077-x. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
3
Comprehensive systematic review on the self-gripping mesh vs sutured mesh in inguinal hernia repair.
腹股沟疝修补术中自固定补片与缝合补片的综合系统评价
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Dec 31;17:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.12.010. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
One-year outcome after open inguinal hernia repair with self-fixated mesh: a randomized controlled trial.开放式腹股沟疝修补术后使用自固定网片的 1 年结果:一项随机对照试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Sep 21;408(1):369. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03106-w.
5
Do all roads lead to Rome?: A retrospective analysis on surgical technique in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.所有的路都通向罗马吗?:回顾性分析 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术技术。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7254-7263. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10257-w. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of mesh fixation techniques for laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia surgeries.网片固定技术在腹腔镜和开放式腹股沟疝手术中的成本效益分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 6;22(1):1125. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08491-4.
7
Postoperative pain and pain-related health-care contacts after open inguinal hernia repair with Adhesix™ and Progrip™: a randomized controlled trial.采用 AdhesixTM 和 ProgripTM 行开放式腹股沟疝修补术后的疼痛及相关医疗接触:一项随机对照试验。
Hernia. 2022 Aug;26(4):1095-1104. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02549-8. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
8
Self-adhesive hydrogel meshes reduce tissue incorporation and mechanical behavior versus microgrips self-fixation: a preclinical study.自粘性水凝胶网片与微夹自固定相比,可减少组织整合和改变力学行为:一项临床前研究。
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):543-555. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02552-z. Epub 2022 Jan 7.