• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝伐珠单抗耐药性高级别胶质瘤分次立体定向放射外科与单纯化疗的随机前瞻性试验。

Randomized prospective trial of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for bevacizumab-resistant high-grade glioma.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2020 Jun;148(2):353-361. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03526-4. Epub 2020 May 22.

DOI:10.1007/s11060-020-03526-4
PMID:32444980
Abstract

PURPOSE

Outcomes for patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) progressing on bevacizumab (BEV) are dismal. Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (FSRS) has been shown to be feasible and safe when delivered in this setting, but prospective evidence is lacking. This single-institution randomized trial compared FSRS plus BEV-based chemotherapy versus BEV-based chemotherapy alone for BEV-resistant recurrent malignant glioma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HGG patients on BEV with tumor progression after 2 previous treatments were randomized to 1) FSRS plus BEV-based chemotherapy or 2) BEV-based chemotherapy with irinotecan, etoposide, temozolomide, or carboplatin. FSRS was delivered as 32 Gy (8 Gy × 4 fractions within 2 weeks) to the gross target volume and 24 Gy (6 Gy × 4 fractions) to the clinical target volume (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery abnormality). The primary endpoints were local control (LC) at 2 months and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Of the 35 patients enrolled, 29 had glioblastoma (WHO IV) and 6 had anaplastic glioma (WHO III). The median number of prior recurrences was 3. Patients treated with FSRS had significantly improved PFS (5.1 vs 1.8 months, P < .001) and improved LC at 2 months (82% [14/17] vs 27% [4/15], P = .002). The overall median survival was 6.6 months (7.2 months with FSRS vs 4.8 months with chemotherapy alone, P = .11).

CONCLUSIONS

FSRS combined with BEV-based chemotherapy in recurrent HGG patients progressing on BEV is feasible and improves LC and PFS when compared to treatment with BEV-based chemotherapy alone.

摘要

目的

贝伐单抗(bevacizumab,BEV)治疗后复发的高级别胶质瘤(high-grade glioma,HGG)患者的预后较差。在这种情况下,分次立体定向放射外科手术(fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery,FSRS)已被证明是可行且安全的,但缺乏前瞻性证据。本单中心随机试验比较了 FSRS 联合 BEV 为基础的化疗与单独 BEV 为基础的化疗治疗 BEV 耐药性复发性恶性胶质瘤的效果。

材料与方法

接受 BEV 治疗后肿瘤进展的 HGG 患者,在前 2 次治疗后随机分为 1)FSRS 联合 BEV 为基础的化疗组或 2)BEV 为基础的化疗联合伊立替康、依托泊苷、替莫唑胺或卡铂组。FSRS 采用 32 Gy(2 周内 8 Gy×4 次分割)照射大体肿瘤靶区,24 Gy(6 Gy×4 次分割)照射临床靶区(液体衰减反转恢复异常)。主要终点为 2 个月时的局部控制(LC)和无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

35 例患者中,29 例为胶质母细胞瘤(WHO IV 级),6 例为间变星形细胞瘤(WHO III 级)。中位复发次数为 3 次。接受 FSRS 治疗的患者 PFS 显著改善(5.1 个月比 1.8 个月,P<.001),2 个月时 LC 也显著改善(82%[14/17]比 27%[4/15],P=.002)。中位总生存期为 6.6 个月(FSRS 组为 7.2 个月,单独化疗组为 4.8 个月,P=.11)。

结论

在接受 BEV 治疗后复发的 HGG 患者中,FSRS 联合 BEV 为基础的化疗是可行的,与单独接受 BEV 为基础的化疗相比,可提高 LC 和 PFS。

相似文献

1
Randomized prospective trial of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for bevacizumab-resistant high-grade glioma.贝伐珠单抗耐药性高级别胶质瘤分次立体定向放射外科与单纯化疗的随机前瞻性试验。
J Neurooncol. 2020 Jun;148(2):353-361. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03526-4. Epub 2020 May 22.
2
Bevacizumab and re-irradiation for recurrent high grade gliomas: does sequence matter?贝伐单抗联合再放疗治疗复发性高级别胶质瘤:顺序重要吗?
J Neurooncol. 2018 Dec;140(3):623-628. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-2989-z. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
Pulsed Reduced Dose Rate Radiotherapy in Conjunction With Bevacizumab or Bevacizumab Alone in Recurrent High-grade Glioma: Survival Outcomes.脉冲低剂量率放疗联合或不联合贝伐珠单抗治疗复发性高级别胶质瘤:生存结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Nov 15;108(4):979-986. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
4
Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for malignant gliomas: comparison with single session stereotactic radiosurgery.分次立体定向放射外科治疗恶性胶质瘤:与单次立体定向放射外科治疗的比较。
J Neurooncol. 2019 Dec;145(3):571-579. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03328-3. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
5
Salvage re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma and comparison to bevacizumab alone.挽救性再放疗治疗复发性高级别胶质瘤,并与贝伐珠单抗单药治疗进行比较。
J Neurooncol. 2017 Dec;135(3):581-591. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2611-9. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
6
Hypofractionated re-irradiation with bevacizumab for relapsed chemorefractory glioblastoma after prior high dose radiotherapy: a feasible option for patients with large-volume relapse.大体积复发的高剂量放疗后复发且对化疗耐药的胶质母细胞瘤的低分割再放疗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗:一种适合大体积复发患者的可行选择。
J Neurooncol. 2024 May;168(1):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04643-0. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
7
Salvage fractionated stereotactic re-irradiation (FSRT) for patients with recurrent high grade gliomas progressed after bevacizumab treatment.挽救性分割立体定向再放疗(FSRT)用于贝伐珠单抗治疗后进展的复发性高级别胶质瘤患者。
J Neurooncol. 2018 Mar;137(1):171-177. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2709-0. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
8
Bevacizumab plus irinotecan with or without gamma knife radiosurgery after failure of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for high-grade glioma.对于高级别胶质瘤,在同步放化疗失败后,使用贝伐单抗联合伊立替康,联合或不联合伽玛刀放射治疗。
J Neurooncol. 2022 Feb;156(3):541-549. doi: 10.1007/s11060-021-03930-4. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
9
Hypofractionated Radiosurgery Plus Bevacizumab for Locally Recurrent Brain Metastasis with Previously High-Dose Irradiation.大分割立体定向放射外科联合贝伐珠单抗治疗既往高剂量放疗后局部复发脑转移瘤
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;133:e252-e258. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.233. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
10
A Randomized Phase II Trial (TAMIGA) Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Bevacizumab Through Multiple Lines of Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma.一项评估贝伐珠单抗连续用药治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤的疗效和安全性的随机 II 期临床试验(TAMIGA)。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):521-528. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0290. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes After Proton Therapy Reirradiation for Recurrent Malignant Glioma: Analysis From the Prospective Proton Collaborative Group Registry.复发性恶性胶质瘤质子治疗再程放疗后的临床结局:来自前瞻性质子协作组登记处的分析
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jun 13;10(8):101834. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101834. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Efficacy and safety of combining re-irradiation with bevacizumab compared to bevacizumab alone in the management of recurrent high-grade gliomas: a meta-analysis and systematic review.与单独使用贝伐单抗相比,再程放疗联合贝伐单抗治疗复发性高级别胶质瘤的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2025 Jun 14;18:17562864251343574. doi: 10.1177/17562864251343574. eCollection 2025.
3
Treatment mechanism and research progress of bevacizumab for glioblastoma.
贝伐单抗治疗胶质母细胞瘤的作用机制及研究进展
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Apr 25;15(4):1874-1901. doi: 10.62347/RNUE7193. eCollection 2025.
4
Identifying the best treatment choice for relapsing/refractory glioblastoma: a systematic review with multiple Bayesian network meta-analyses.确定复发性/难治性胶质母细胞瘤的最佳治疗选择:一项包含多项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析的系统评价
Oncologist. 2024 Dec 14. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae338.
5
Clinical research framework proposal for ketogenic metabolic therapy in glioblastoma.胶质母细胞瘤生酮代谢疗法的临床研究框架提案
BMC Med. 2024 Dec 5;22(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03775-4.
6
Point/Counterpoint: The role of reirradiation in recurrent glioblastoma.针锋相对:再程放疗在复发性胶质母细胞瘤中的作用
Neuro Oncol. 2025 Jan 12;27(1):7-12. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae209.
7
The efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy followed by bevacizumab and temozolomide in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: a case report.立体定向放射治疗后联合贝伐单抗和替莫唑胺治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤的疗效:一例报告
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 4;15:1401000. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1401000. eCollection 2024.
8
Criteria for Re-Irradiation.再照射标准。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Nov 1;121(22):725-732. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0156.
9
Evidence-based clinical recommendations for hypofractionated radiotherapy: exploring efficacy and safety - Part 1. Brain and head and neck.大分割放疗的循证临床建议:疗效与安全性探索 - 第1部分。脑及头颈部
Radiat Oncol J. 2024 Mar;42(1):17-31. doi: 10.3857/roj.2023.00899. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
10
Adjuvant re-irradiation vs. no early re-irradiation of resected recurrent glioblastoma: pooled comparative cohort analysis from two tertiary centers.辅助再放疗与切除后复发性胶质母细胞瘤的早期无再放疗比较:来自两个三级中心的 pooled 对比队列分析。
J Neurooncol. 2024 May;168(1):49-56. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04633-2. Epub 2024 Mar 23.