Division of Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Division of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cinicinnati, Ohio.
Am J Ind Med. 2020 Aug;63(8):663-675. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23123. Epub 2020 May 23.
Public health research uses decedents' usual industry and occupation (I&O) from US death certificates to assess mortality incidence and risk factors. Of necessity, such research may exclude decedents with insufficient I&O information, and assume death certificates reflect current (at time of death) I&O. This study explored the demographic implications of such research conditions by describing usual occupation and current employment status among decedents by demographic characteristics in a large multistate data set.
Death certificate occupations classified by Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) (ie, compensated occupation) and other categories (eg, student) for 36 507 decedents (suicide, homicide, other, undetermined intent) age 22+ years from the 2016 National Violent Death Reporting System's (NVDRS) 32 US states were analyzed. Decedents not employed at the time of death (eg, laid off) were identified through nondeath certificate NVDRS data sources (eg, law enforcement reports).
Female decedents, younger (age < 30 years) male decedents, some non-White racial group decedents, less educated decedents, and undetermined intent death decedents were statistically less likely to be classified by SOC based on death certificates-primarily due to insufficient information. Decedents classified by SOC from death certificates but whose non-death certificate data indicated no employment at the time of death were more often 30+ years old, White, less educated, died by suicide, or had nonmanagement occupations.
Whether decedents have classifiable occupations from death certificates may vary by demographic characteristics. Research studies that assess decedents by usual I&O can identify and describe how any such demographic trends may affect research results on particular public health topics.
公共卫生研究使用美国死亡证明中的死者生前通常从事的行业和职业(I&O)来评估死亡率和风险因素。在研究中,必然会排除那些生前职业信息不足的死者,并假设死亡证明反映了死者死亡时的当前职业情况。本研究通过描述大样本多州数据集按人口统计学特征分类的死者生前职业和当前就业状况,探讨了这种研究条件的人口统计学意义。
对 2016 年国家暴力死亡报告系统(NVDRS)32 个州的 36507 名年龄在 22 岁及以上的(自杀、他杀、其他、死因不明)死者的死亡证明职业(按标准职业分类(SOC)分类,即有酬职业)和其他类别(如学生)进行了分析。通过非死亡证明 NVDRS 数据源(如执法报告)确定了死者在死亡时未就业的情况(如下岗)。
女性死者、年龄较小(<30 岁)的男性死者、某些非白人群体的死者、受教育程度较低的死者和死因不明的死者,由于信息不足,在统计上不太可能通过死亡证明进行 SOC 分类。从死亡证明上分类为 SOC 的死者,但从非死亡证明数据上看,他们在死亡时没有就业,这些死者往往年龄在 30 岁以上,为白人,受教育程度较低,死于自杀,或从事非管理职业。
死者是否有可从死亡证明中分类的职业,可能因人口统计学特征而异。评估死者生前通常职业的研究可以识别并描述任何此类人口统计学趋势如何影响特定公共卫生主题的研究结果。