Suppr超能文献

使用泡沫轴或球按压肌筋膜触发点治疗运动引起的前膝疼痛:一项随机对照试验

Compression of Myofascial Trigger Points With a Foam Roller or Ball for Exercise-induced Anterior Knee Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Li Lihui, Huang Fujun, Huang Qiangmin, Liu Lin, Opoku Antwi Eric, Nguyen Thitham

出版信息

Altern Ther Health Med. 2020 May;26(3):16-23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of compression of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) with a foam roller or ball, combined with static stretching of knee muscles, on exercise-induced, anterior knee pain in fitness runners.

DESIGN

The research team designed a randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

The study took place in the Department of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation Center of the School of Kinesiology at Shanghai University of Sport in Shanghai, China.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 80 participants, 28 males and 52 females with an average age of 37.2 ± 2.9 years, were recruited at the center.

INTERVENTION

The participants were randomly assigned to one of 4 groups, with 20 participants in each group: (1) the MG+SG group, which received compression with a foam roller or ball (MG) and static stretching (SG); (2) the MG group, which received compression only; (3) the SG group static, which received static stretching only; or (4) the control group (CG), which attended a 30-min class about nutrition or exercise once a month and received no intervention. For the MG intervention, participants' MTrPs were compressed with a foam roller or ball for 30 minutes once every 5 days for 2 months. After each compression, the MG+SG group received static stretching immediately.

OUTCOME MEASURES

A visual analog scale (VAS) and a participant's range of motion (ROM) of the knee were assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks of the intervention, immediately postintervention, and at a follow-up at 8 weeks postintervention. The effectiveness of the treatment in the different groups was also compared.

RESULTS

Immediately postintervention, 18 participants (90%) in MG+SG group, 12 (60%) in MG group, and 8 (40%) in the SG group were pain free. Compared with those at baseline, the VAS scores of the MG+SG group significantly improved between baseline and postintervention and were unchanged at the eight-week follow-up. In all groups, the VAS scores and ROMs of the knee increased, but only the MG+SG group's values increased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Compression of MTrPs with a foam roller or ball, combined with static stretching, was more effective than either the compression only or static stretching only.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估使用泡沫轴或球对肌筋膜触发点(MTrPs)进行按压,并结合对膝关节肌肉进行静态拉伸,对健身跑步者运动诱发的前膝疼痛的疗效。

设计

研究团队设计了一项随机对照试验。

地点

该研究在中国上海上海体育学院运动科学学院运动医学与康复中心进行。

参与者

该中心共招募了80名参与者,其中男性28名,女性52名,平均年龄为37.2±2.9岁。

干预措施

参与者被随机分配到4组中的一组,每组20人:(1)MG+SG组,接受泡沫轴或球按压(MG)和静态拉伸(SG);(2)MG组,仅接受按压;(3)SG组,仅接受静态拉伸;或(4)对照组(CG),每月参加一次30分钟的营养或运动课程,不接受任何干预。对于MG干预,每5天用泡沫轴或球对参与者的MTrPs进行一次30分钟的按压,持续2个月。每次按压后,MG+SG组立即进行静态拉伸。

观察指标

在基线、干预4周后、干预结束后立即以及干预后8周随访时,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估参与者的疼痛程度,并测量膝关节活动范围(ROM)。同时比较不同组治疗的有效性。

结果

干预结束后立即评估发现,MG+SG组有18名参与者(90%)无痛,MG组有12名(60%),SG组有8名(40%)。与基线相比,MG+SG组的VAS评分在干预前后显著改善,在8周随访时无变化。所有组的膝关节VAS评分和ROM均有所增加,但只有MG+SG组的值显著增加。

结论

使用泡沫轴或球对MTrPs进行按压并结合静态拉伸,比单纯按压或单纯静态拉伸更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验