Suppr超能文献

运动康复是肌筋膜触发点临床治疗的有效辅助手段吗?一项系统评价与Meta分析

Is Exercise Rehabilitation an Effective Adjuvant to Clinical Treatment for Myofascial Trigger Points? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Zhou Yu, Lu Jiao, Liu Lin, Wang Hao-Wei

机构信息

School of Sports Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

School of Sport and Health, Nanjing Sport Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2023 Jan 28;16:245-256. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S390386. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To systematically evaluate the effect of exercise rehabilitation as an adjuvant to clinical treatment for myofascial trigger points (MTrPs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ESBCO, PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, China Knowledge Network (CNKI), and Wanfang databases were comprehensively searched from database inception date through July 2022. Randomized controlled trials comparing MTrPs treatments that included exercise rehabilitation with a single clinical treatment. Two researchers independently screened articles using inclusion/exclusion criteria, scored methodologic quality, and extracted data including patient demographics, interventions, and outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 14 RCTs (N = 734). Results showed short-term (mean difference [MD], -2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.08 to -0.41; Z = 2.40; P = 0.02) and long-term (MD = -0.47; 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.17; Z = 3.05; P = 0.02) adjuvant exercise rehabilitation treatments were superior in reducing musculoskeletal pain intensity to single clinical treatment in controls, but long-term versus short-term effectiveness was not significantly different. The exercise rehabilitation group more effectively increased the range of motion (ROM) (standardized mean difference [SMD], 1.04; 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.77; Z = 2.84; P = 0.005) and decreased dysfunction (SMD = -0.93; 95% CI: -1.82 to -0.05; Z = 2.06; P = 0.04) than controls; no significant difference was observed in the pressure pain threshold (PPT) between two groups.

CONCLUSION

Exercise rehabilitation as an adjuvant to clinical treatment for MTrPs was moderately effective in relieving pain intensity, increasing ROM, and improving dysfunction versus single clinical intervention. These findings must be validated by larger, higher-quality studies.

摘要

目的

系统评价运动康复作为肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)临床治疗辅助手段的效果。

患者与方法

全面检索了ESBCO、PubMed、Science Direct、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)和万方数据库,检索时间从建库至2022年7月。纳入比较包含运动康复的MTrP治疗与单一临床治疗的随机对照试验。两名研究人员独立使用纳入/排除标准筛选文章,对方法学质量进行评分,并提取包括患者人口统计学、干预措施和结局等数据。

结果

我们纳入了14项随机对照试验(N = 734)。结果显示,辅助运动康复治疗在短期(平均差[MD],-2.25;95%置信区间[CI],-4.08至-0.41;Z = 2.40;P = 0.02)和长期(MD = -0.47;95% CI:-0.80至-0.17;Z = 3.05;P = 0.02)在减轻肌肉骨骼疼痛强度方面优于对照组的单一临床治疗,但长期与短期疗效无显著差异。运动康复组比对照组更有效地增加了关节活动范围(ROM)(标准化平均差[SMD],1.04;95% CI:0.32至1.77;Z = 2.84;P = 0.005)并减少了功能障碍(SMD = -0.93;95% CI:-1.82至-0.05;Z = 2.06;P = 0.04);两组之间的压痛阈值(PPT)无显著差异。

结论

与单一临床干预相比,运动康复作为MTrP临床治疗的辅助手段在缓解疼痛强度、增加ROM和改善功能障碍方面有中度效果。这些发现必须通过更大规模、更高质量的研究来验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5771/9891493/b0c79670e025/JPR-16-245-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验