Husain Muhammad Ishrat, Chaudhry Imran B, Khoso Ameer B, Husain Muhammad Omair, Hodsoll John, Ansari Moin A, Naqvi Haider A, Minhas Fareed A, Carvalho Andre F, Meyer Jeffrey H, Deakin Bill, Mulsant Benoit H, Husain Nusrat, Young Allan H
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Pakistan Institute of Learning and Living, Karachi, Pakistan; Department of Pyschiatry, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan; Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):515-527. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30138-3. Epub 2020 May 20.
Several small studies suggest that the adjunctive use of anti-inflammatory agents might improve depressive symptoms in bipolar disorder. However, there are few well designed, appropriately powered clinical trials assessing the efficacy of these novel treatment strategies. We aimed to assess the efficacy of adjunctive minocycline or celecoxib in this setting.
This double-blind, 12-week, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was done in four outpatient psychiatric clinics in Pakistan. Eligible participants were adults (aged 18-65 years) with DSM-5 bipolar disorder (type I or II) and a major depressive episode. In a 2 × 2 factorial design, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive either active minocycline plus active celecoxib, active minocycline plus placebo celecoxib, placebo minocycline plus active celecoxib, or placebo minocycline plus placebo celecoxib. The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline to week 12 in score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), assessed in all randomised participants (missing data were imputed and assumed to be missing at random). The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02703363.
266 (17%) of 1542 patients assessed between May 1, 2016, and March 31, 2019, were randomly assigned to receive minocycline plus celecoxib (n=68), minocycline plus placebo (n=66), celecoxib plus placebo (n=66), or placebo plus placebo (n=66). From baseline to week 12, depressive symptoms as per HAMD-17 reduced in all four groups (from 24·5-25·2 to 11·3-12·8), but these reductions did not differ significantly between the groups. In terms of main effects, reductions in HAMD-17 did not differ for patients treated with minocycline (mean adjusted difference vs non-minocycline 1·48 [95% CI -0·41 to 3·36]; p=0·123) or for celecoxib (mean adjusted difference vs non-celecoxib -0·74 [-2·61 to 1·14]; p=0·443). Rates of serious adverse effects did not differ between groups (31 participants had a manic switch, two self-harmed, and one died in a motor vehicle accident).
We found no evidence that minocycline or celecoxib was superior to placebo for the treatment of bipolar depression. This large trial casts doubt on the potential therapeutic benefits of adjunctive anti-inflammatory drugs for the acute management of bipolar depression.
Stanley Medical Research Institute.
多项小型研究表明,辅助使用抗炎药可能改善双相情感障碍的抑郁症状。然而,很少有设计良好、样本量充足的临床试验来评估这些新型治疗策略的疗效。我们旨在评估在此情况下辅助使用米诺环素或塞来昔布的疗效。
这项双盲、为期12周的随机、安慰剂对照试验在巴基斯坦的四家门诊精神科诊所进行。符合条件的参与者为年龄在18至65岁之间、患有DSM-5双相情感障碍(I型或II型)且伴有重度抑郁发作的成年人。采用2×2析因设计,参与者被随机分配(1:1:1:1)接受活性米诺环素加活性塞来昔布、活性米诺环素加安慰剂塞来昔布、安慰剂米诺环素加活性塞来昔布或安慰剂米诺环素加安慰剂塞来昔布。主要结局是所有随机分组参与者从基线到第12周17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)评分的平均变化(缺失数据进行了插补,并假定为随机缺失)。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT02703363。
在2016年5月1日至2019年3月31日期间评估的1542例患者中,266例(17%)被随机分配接受米诺环素加塞来昔布(n = 68)、米诺环素加安慰剂(n = 66)、塞来昔布加安慰剂(n = 66)或安慰剂加安慰剂(n = 66)。从基线到第12周,所有四组的HAMD-17抑郁症状均有所减轻(从24.5 - 25.2降至11.3 - 12.8),但组间差异无统计学意义。就主要效应而言,接受米诺环素治疗的患者HAMD-17的降低与未接受米诺环素治疗的患者相比无差异(平均调整差异vs非米诺环素组为1.48 [95%CI -0.41至3.36];p = 0.123),接受塞来昔布治疗的患者与未接受塞来昔布治疗的患者相比也无差异(平均调整差异vs非塞来昔布组为-0.74 [-2.61至1.14];p = 0.443)。各组严重不良反应发生率无差异(31名参与者出现躁狂发作转换,2名有自伤行为,1名死于机动车事故)。
我们没有发现证据表明米诺环素或塞来昔布在治疗双相抑郁方面优于安慰剂。这项大型试验对辅助抗炎药物用于双相抑郁急性治疗的潜在治疗益处提出了质疑。
斯坦利医学研究所。