Unidade de Investigação em Ciências Orais e Biomédicas (UICOB), Faculdade de Medicina Dentária, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal; Centro de Estudo de Medicina Dentária Baseada na Evidência, Faculdade de Medicina Dentária, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal; Instituto de Implantologia, Lisboa, Portugal.
Centro de Estudo de Medicina Dentária Baseada na Evidência, Faculdade de Medicina Dentária, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal; Instituto de Implantologia, Lisboa, Portugal; LIBPhys-FCT UID/FIS/04559/2013, Lisboa, Portugal.
Arch Oral Biol. 2020 Aug;116:104749. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.104749. Epub 2020 May 11.
The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the influence of population demographic characteristics on the prevalence of a second canal in mandibular anterior teeth.
Four electronic databases and five peer-reviewed journals were searched from May 2018 to September 2019 for prevalence studies using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging on second canal morphology in mandibular anterior teeth. The identified studies were subjected to a hand search of bibliographic references followed by contact with the authors. Full text analysis and critical appraisal (JBI) was undertaken on 40 papers by 2 evaluators. Sixteen studies were included into a meta-analysis. Forest plots with proportion and odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval were calculated. Meta-regression was performed in order to identify possible sources of heterogeneity.
The 16 selected studies presented an average JBI score of 77.7% and revealed data from 40,784 mandibular anterior teeth (14,278 central incisors, 14,433 lateral incisors, and 12,073 canines). The overall prevalence of a second canal for central incisors, lateral incisors and canines was 20.4% (15.0%-25.7% CI 95%), 25.3% (20.0%-30.7% CI 95%) and 5.9% (4.1%-7.7% CI 95%), respectively. Males showed significantly higher odds of having a second canal for both incisors (p < 0.05). East Asia studies presented lower proportions of a second canal in mandibular anterior teeth (p < 0.05).
The overall prevalence of a second canal in the mandibular central and lateral incisors and canines was 20.4%, 25.3% and 5.9%, respectively. Meta-analysis calculation revealed gender and patient geographic origin as possible confounding factors of the proportion outcomes.
本系统评价旨在评估人口统计学特征对下颌前牙第二根管发生率的影响。
2018 年 5 月至 2019 年 9 月,我们通过电子数据库和 5 种同行评议期刊检索了使用锥形束计算机断层扫描成像评估下颌前牙第二根管形态的发生率研究。对确定的研究进行了文献追溯,并与作者进行了联系。由 2 名评估人员对 40 篇论文进行了全文分析和批判性评估(JBI)。16 项研究纳入了荟萃分析。计算了带有 95%置信区间的比例和比值比的森林图。进行了荟萃回归以确定可能的异质性来源。
16 项入选研究的 JBI 平均得分为 77.7%,涉及 40784 颗下颌前牙(14278 颗中切牙、14433 颗侧切牙和 12073 颗尖牙)。中切牙、侧切牙和尖牙的第二根管总发生率分别为 20.4%(95%CI 15.0%-25.7%)、25.3%(95%CI 20.0%-30.7%)和 5.9%(95%CI 4.1%-7.7%)。男性发生第二根管的几率明显更高(p < 0.05)。东亚的研究报告下颌前牙第二根管的比例较低(p < 0.05)。
下颌中切牙和侧切牙以及尖牙的第二根管总发生率分别为 20.4%、25.3%和 5.9%。荟萃分析结果表明,性别和患者地理位置可能是影响发生率的混杂因素。