Suppr超能文献

在常规预防时代,B族链球菌定植与产妇围产期感染有关吗?

Is Group B Streptococcus Colonization Associated with Maternal Peripartum Infection in an Era of Routine Prophylaxis?

作者信息

Venkatesh Kartik K, Vladutiu Catherine J, Glover Angelica V, Strauss Robert A, Stringer Jeffrey S A, Stamilio David M, Hughes Brenna, Dotters-Katz Sarah

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Division of Global Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2021 Aug;38(S 01):e262-e268. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709666. Epub 2020 May 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess whether colonization with group B streptococcus (GBS) is associated with maternal peripartum infection in an era of routine prophylaxis.

STUDY DESIGN

This study presented a secondary analysis of women delivering ≥37 weeks who underwent a trial of labor from the U.S. Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL) study. The exposure was maternal GBS colonization and the outcome was a diagnosis of chorioamnionitis, and secondarily, analyses were restricted to deliveries not admitted in labor and measures of postpartum infection (postpartum fever, endometritis, and surgical site infection). Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used accounting for within-woman correlations. Models adjusted for maternal age, parity, race, prepregnancy body mass index, pregestational diabetes, insurance status, study site/region, year of delivery, number of vaginal exams from admission to delivery, and time (in hours) from admission to delivery.

RESULTS

Among 170,804 assessed women, 33,877 (19.8%) were colonized with GBS and 5,172 (3.0%) were diagnosed with chorioamnionitis. While the frequency of GBS colonization did not vary by chorioamnionitis status (3.0% in both groups), in multivariable analyses, GBS colonization was associated with slightly lower odds of chorioamnionitis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.96). In secondary analyses, this association held regardless of spontaneous labor on admission; and the odds of postpartum infectious outcomes were not higher with GBS colonization.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to historical data, GBS colonization was associated with lower odds of chorioamnionitis in an era of routine GBS screening and prophylaxis.

KEY POINTS

· Data in an era prior to routine group B streptococcus (GBS) screening and prophylaxis showed that maternal GBS colonization was associated with a higher frequency of maternal peripartum infection.. · In the current study, GBS colonization was associated with lower odds of chorioamnionitis in an era of routine GBS screening and prophylaxis.. · The results highlight potential benefits of GBS screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis beyond neonatal disease prevention, including mitigating the risk of maternal infectious morbidity..

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在常规预防时代,B族链球菌(GBS)定植是否与孕产妇围产期感染相关。

研究设计

本研究对美国安全分娩联盟(CSL)研究中孕周≥37周且接受引产试验的产妇进行了二次分析。暴露因素为孕产妇GBS定植,结局为绒毛膜羊膜炎诊断,其次,分析仅限于非临产入院分娩情况及产后感染指标(产后发热、子宫内膜炎和手术部位感染)。采用广义估计方程的逻辑回归分析,并考虑了女性个体内的相关性。模型对孕产妇年龄、产次、种族、孕前体重指数、孕前糖尿病、保险状况、研究地点/地区、分娩年份、入院至分娩期间的阴道检查次数以及入院至分娩的时间(小时数)进行了校正。

结果

在170,804名接受评估的女性中,33,877名(19.8%)GBS定植,5,172名(3.0%)被诊断为绒毛膜羊膜炎。虽然GBS定植频率在绒毛膜羊膜炎组间无差异(两组均为3.0%),但在多变量分析中,GBS定植与绒毛膜羊膜炎的较低发生几率相关(校正比值比[AOR]:0.89;95%置信区间[CI]:0.83 - 0.96)。在二次分析中,无论入院时是否自然临产,这种关联均成立;GBS定植并不会使产后感染结局的发生几率更高。

结论

与历史数据相反,在常规GBS筛查和预防时代,GBS定植与绒毛膜羊膜炎的较低发生几率相关。

要点

· 在常规B族链球菌(GBS)筛查和预防之前的时代的数据显示,孕产妇GBS定植与孕产妇围产期感染的较高发生率相关。· 在当前研究中,在常规GBS筛查和预防时代,GBS定植与绒毛膜羊膜炎的较低发生几率相关。· 结果凸显了GBS筛查和产时抗生素预防在预防新生儿疾病之外的潜在益处,包括降低孕产妇感染性发病风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验