Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Neonatal Intensive Care, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 1;17(4):e0264309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264309. eCollection 2022.
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a major cause of serious neonatal infection but its role in maternal morbidity has received little investigation. The aim of this study was to determine whether GBS colonization at delivery is associated with increased risk of maternal peripartum infection.
In this prospective cohort study, 1746 unselected women had a vaginal-rectal culture taken at the onset of labor. Diagnosis of maternal peripartum infection was based on a combination of two or more signs or symptoms including fever, breast pain, severe wound or pelvic pain, purulent discharge and abnormal laboratory tests including C-reactive protein and white blood cell count occurring from labor until 2 weeks postpartum. The main outcome measure was the proportion of women with maternal peripartum infection according to GBS colonization status.
A total of 25.9% (452/1746) women were colonized with GBS. The rate of peripartum infection was almost twice as high in colonized women (49/452 [10.8%]) vs. non-colonized women (81/1294 [6.3%]); OR 1.82 [1.26-2.64], p = 0.002). This association was confirmed in a multivariable model (OR 1.99 [1.35-2.95], p = 0.001). Women diagnosed with peripartum infection had a significantly longer hospital stay compared to women without peripartum infection (4 days (median) vs. 3 days, p < 0.001). Length of hospital stay did not differ between colonized and non-colonized women. Serotype IV GBS was more frequent in colonized women with peripartum infection than in women without peripartum infection (29.3% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.003).
GBS colonization at delivery is associated with increased risk of peripartum infection. Whether this increase is due directly to invasion by GBS or whether GBS colonization is associated with a more general vulnerability to infection remains to be determined.
B 组链球菌(GBS)是导致严重新生儿感染的主要原因,但它在产妇发病中的作用却很少受到研究。本研究的目的是确定分娩时 GBS 定植是否与产妇围产期感染风险增加有关。
在这项前瞻性队列研究中,1746 名未经选择的妇女在分娩开始时进行阴道直肠培养。产妇围产期感染的诊断基于两种或两种以上的体征或症状的组合,包括发热、乳房疼痛、严重伤口或骨盆疼痛、脓性分泌物和异常实验室检查,包括 C 反应蛋白和白细胞计数,从分娩到产后 2 周发生。主要观察指标是根据 GBS 定植状态,产妇围产期感染的妇女比例。
共有 25.9%(452/1746)的妇女定植了 GBS。与未定植的妇女(81/1294[6.3%])相比,定植的妇女围产期感染率几乎高出一倍(49/452[10.8%]);OR 1.82[1.26-2.64],p=0.002)。在多变量模型中也证实了这种关联(OR 1.99[1.35-2.95],p=0.001)。与无围产期感染的妇女相比,诊断为围产期感染的妇女住院时间明显延长(4 天(中位数)vs.3 天,p<0.001)。定植和未定植的妇女住院时间无差异。与无围产期感染的妇女相比,定植的妇女伴围产期感染时 IV 型 GBS 更为常见(29.3%vs.12.5%,p=0.003)。
分娩时 GBS 定植与围产期感染风险增加有关。这种增加是直接由 GBS 侵袭引起,还是 GBS 定植与更普遍的感染易感性有关,仍有待确定。