• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年马凡综合征患者与非马凡综合征患者升主动脉扩张的演变与根 Ghent 标准的比较。

Comparison of Evolution of Aortic Root Dilation and Ghent Criteria in Preadolescents and Adolescents with and without Marfan Syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA.

The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;221:188-195.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.005
PMID:32446479
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the Ghent Criteria (2010) can be reliably used in evaluating preadolescents and adolescents for Marfan syndrome by comparing aortic growth, systemic scores, and anthropometric features in individuals with and without Marfan syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review was completed for patients less than 15 years of age referred for Marfan syndrome. Comparisons were made between the first and last visit. Paired t tests were used to compare Ghent systemic scores. Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to compare age, aortic root z scores, height z scores, and body mass index z scores. Recursive partitioning was used to identify combinations of factors to distinguish Marfan syndrome.

RESULTS

In total, 53 individuals met inclusion criteria (29 Marfan syndrome and 24 non-Marfan syndrome). Ghent systemic score increased in the Marfan syndrome group and declined in the non-Marfan syndrome. The non-Marfan syndrome group did not develop progressive aortic root dilation with age. Individuals with Marfan syndrome had higher median height z scores than non-Marfan syndrome, with no difference in median body mass index z score between groups. A combination of aortic root z score above 0.95 and Ghent systemic score above 3 was highly indicative of a Marfan syndrome diagnosis in children less than 15 years of age.

CONCLUSION

The Ghent criteria (2010) can be used to reliably exclude a diagnosis of Marfan syndrome in individuals less than 15 years of age. Genetic testing should be used as an aide in confirming or excluding the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome in individuals with an aortic root z score above 0.95 in combination with a Ghent systemic score above 3 at initial visit.

摘要

目的

通过比较马凡综合征患者和非马凡综合征患者的主动脉生长、全身评分和人体测量特征,确定 2010 年根特标准能否可靠地用于评估青春期前和青春期的马凡综合征。

研究设计

对因马凡综合征而就诊的年龄小于 15 岁的患者进行了回顾性图表审查。比较了首次就诊和末次就诊时的情况。采用配对 t 检验比较根特全身评分,采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较年龄、主动脉根部 z 评分、身高 z 评分和体重指数 z 评分。采用递归分区法识别区分马凡综合征的因素组合。

结果

共有 53 名符合纳入标准的患者(29 名马凡综合征和 24 名非马凡综合征)。马凡综合征组的根特全身评分增加,而非马凡综合征组的评分下降。非马凡综合征组的主动脉根部随年龄无进行性扩张。马凡综合征患者的身高 z 评分中位数高于非马凡综合征患者,但两组的体重指数 z 评分中位数无差异。主动脉根部 z 评分大于 0.95 和根特全身评分大于 3 的组合在年龄小于 15 岁的儿童中高度提示马凡综合征的诊断。

结论

2010 年根特标准可用于可靠排除年龄小于 15 岁的个体患马凡综合征的诊断。在初始就诊时主动脉根部 z 评分大于 0.95 且根特全身评分大于 3 的个体中,应使用基因检测作为辅助手段来确认或排除马凡综合征的诊断。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Evolution of Aortic Root Dilation and Ghent Criteria in Preadolescents and Adolescents with and without Marfan Syndrome.青少年马凡综合征患者与非马凡综合征患者升主动脉扩张的演变与根 Ghent 标准的比较。
J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;221:188-195.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.005.
2
The new Ghent criteria for Marfan syndrome: what do they change?新的马凡综合征根特标准:它们改变了什么?
Clin Genet. 2012 May;81(5):433-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01703.x. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
3
Study of phenotype evolution during childhood in Marfan syndrome to improve clinical recognition.马凡综合征儿童期表型演变的研究以改善临床识别。
Genet Med. 2014 Mar;16(3):246-50. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.123. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
4
Revised Ghent Criteria is Comparable to Original Diagnostic Criteria for Marfan Syndrome with Increased Ability to Clinically Diagnose Related Disorders.修订后的根特标准与马凡综合征的原始诊断标准相当,临床诊断相关疾病的能力有所提高。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Jan;99(1):34-9.
5
Comparability of different Z-score equations for aortic root dimensions in children with Marfan syndrome.不同 Z 分数方程在马凡综合征患儿主动脉根部尺寸中的可比性。
Cardiol Young. 2021 Dec;31(12):1962-1968. doi: 10.1017/S1047951121001311. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
6
Marfan syndrome and related connective tissue disorders in the current era in Switzerland in 103 patients: medical and surgical management and impact of genetic testing.瑞士当前时代的马凡综合征和相关结缔组织疾病:103 例患者的医学和外科治疗以及基因检测的影响。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Apr 3;150:w20189. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20189. eCollection 2020 Mar 23.
7
Comparison of Cine-MRI and Transthoracic Echocardiography for the Assessment of Aortic Root Diameters in Patients with Suspected Marfan Syndrome.电影磁共振成像与经胸超声心动图在疑似马凡综合征患者主动脉根部直径评估中的比较
Rofo. 2015 Nov;187(11):1022-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1553224. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
8
Aortic Root Dilation: Do Patients With Marfan Syndrome Fare Worse Than Those With Marfanoid Features?升主动脉扩张:马凡综合征患者比马凡样特征患者预后更差吗?
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Feb;93(2):179-183. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.10.018. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
9
Cardiovascular characteristics in Marfan syndrome and their relation to the genotype.马凡综合征的心血管特征及其与基因型的关系。
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2009;71(6):335-71.
10
A comparison of the Ghent and revised Ghent nosologies for the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome in an adult Korean population.一项针对成年韩国人群中马凡综合征的根特和修订的根特分类诊断比较。
Am J Med Genet A. 2012 May;158A(5):989-95. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34392. Epub 2011 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Marfan Syndrome in Children With Congenital Ectopia Lentis: Development and Validation of a Nomogram.预测先天性晶状体异位儿童的马凡综合征:列线图的制定和验证。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Mar 1;13(3):15. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.3.15.
2
How to Distinguish Marfan Syndrome from Marfanoid Habitus in a Physical Examination-Comparison of External Features in Patients with Marfan Syndrome and Marfanoid Habitus.如何在体格检查中区分马凡综合征与马凡样体型——马凡综合征与马凡样体型患者的体貌特征比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 11;19(2):772. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020772.