Departamento de Medicina Legal, Ética Médica e Medicina Social e do Trabalho, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Departamento de Medicina Legal, Ética Médica e Medicina Social e do Trabalho, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Center for Internet Augmented Research and Assessment (CIARA), Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020 Jul;47:102307. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102307. Epub 2020 May 15.
Latent fingerprints are commonly found in crime scenes, and currently used in forensic analysis to obtain STR profiles from DNA recovered from finger contact. Analysis of STR profiles obtained from touch DNA has been very useful to elucidate crimes and the extraction method may be determinant for the recovery of genetic material collected from different surfaces. This study aimed to verify and compare the efficiency of two different extraction kits for processing touch DNA samples obtained from fingerprints deposited on computer keyboards, knife handles and exterior door handles and steering wheels of cars. One hundred and four experiments were conducted to simulate crime scenes and evaluate the efficiency of two extraction kits for touch DNA samples: the DNA IQ™ System and the Casework Direct Kit (both Promega Corporation). Each experiment was conducted with two individuals in order to obtain a mixture profile. The genetic material deposited was collected by double swab method (Sweet et al. 1997) and DNA quantification was conducted using Quantifiler Trio™ (ThermoFisher Scientific). Samples were amplified by PowerPlex® Fusion System kit (Promega). It was possible to obtain STR profiles for 32 (61.5%) out of the 52 extracted using DNA IQ and 51 (98.1%) out of the 52 extracted using the Casework Direct Kit. Samples extracted by DNA IQ had higher average of quantification values for long targets (>200bp) across all tested surfaces. That seems to be due to an incompatibility between the Quantifiler Trio and the Casework Direct Kit. Samples with positive quantification but without STR profile, as well as samples without quantification but with STR profiles were also observed. Statistical analysis showed that the Casework Direct Kit produced significantly more useful profiles than DNA IQ (p-value = 0.001), since these profiles had more STR markers with allelic correspondence to second donators present in the mixture. This study provides insights about the effect of different surfaces and extraction methods on recovery and generation of STR profiles. Limitations for the quantification step for these samples with a low quantity of DNA were highlighted as well. We concluded that the Casework Direct Kit was much more efficient for processing touch DNA samples than DNA IQ.
潜伏指纹通常在犯罪现场被发现,目前用于法医分析,从手指接触中提取的 DNA 中获得 STR 图谱。从接触 DNA 中获得的 STR 图谱分析对于阐明犯罪非常有用,并且提取方法可能是从不同表面收集遗传物质的恢复的决定因素。本研究旨在验证和比较两种不同的提取试剂盒对从指纹沉积在计算机键盘、刀把和外部门把手以及汽车方向盘上的触摸 DNA 样本进行处理的效率。进行了 104 项实验来模拟犯罪现场,并评估两种提取试剂盒对触摸 DNA 样本的效率:DNA IQ™系统和案件直接试剂盒(均来自 Promega 公司)。每个实验都是由两个人进行的,以获得混合图谱。使用双拭子法(Sweet 等人,1997 年)收集沉积的遗传物质,并使用 Quantifiler Trio™(ThermoFisher Scientific)进行 DNA 定量。使用 PowerPlex® Fusion System 试剂盒(Promega)对样品进行扩增。使用 DNA IQ 提取的 52 个样本中有 32 个(61.5%)可以获得 STR 图谱,而使用案件直接试剂盒提取的 52 个样本中有 51 个(98.1%)可以获得 STR 图谱。使用 DNA IQ 提取的样本在所有测试表面上的长靶标(>200bp)的平均定量值更高。这似乎是由于 Quantifiler Trio 和案件直接试剂盒之间不兼容造成的。还观察到具有阳性定量但没有 STR 图谱的样本以及没有定量但具有 STR 图谱的样本。统计分析表明,案件直接试剂盒产生的有用图谱明显多于 DNA IQ(p 值=0.001),因为这些图谱具有更多与混合物中第二供体等位基因对应物的 STR 标记。本研究提供了有关不同表面和提取方法对恢复和生成 STR 图谱的影响的见解。还强调了这些 DNA 数量较少的样本定量步骤的局限性。我们得出结论,案件直接试剂盒处理触摸 DNA 样本的效率远高于 DNA IQ。