Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Dec;39(12):3669-3675. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05157-6. Epub 2020 May 23.
To investigate the effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on disease activity in patients with stable ankylosing spondylitis (AS) receiving tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi).
In this retrospective observational study, a total of 189 patients with stable AS receiving TNFi were included. Patients were classified into NSAID withdrawn group (n = 48) and NSAID continued group (n = 141), according to the use of NSAIDs. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured every 3 months, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) was measured every 6 months as parameters to evaluate disease activity. ESR, CRP, and BASDAI at each time point, and time-averaged values of each parameter during the observation period of 1 year were compared between the two groups. Repeated-measure ANOVA was performed to compare changes in disease activity parameters during the observation period between the two groups.
The level of ESR, CRP, and BASDAI at baseline and during the observation period did not differ between the two groups. The time-averaged values of ESR (p = 0.096), CRP (p = 0.136), and BASDAI (p = 0.421), and changes of ESR (p = 0.101), CRP (p = 0.714), and BASDAI (p = 0.613) during the observation period were not significantly different between the two groups.
The continued use of NSAIDs in patients with stable AS receiving TNFi had no additional benefit in controlling the disease activity, as compared to patients who withdrew NSAIDs. Considering the risk of toxicity of long-term NSAID use, withdrawal of NSAIDs in stable AS patients receiving TNFi may be preferable. Key points • There is a lack of supportive evidence whether to continue or withdraw non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with stable ankylosing spondylitis (AS) receiving tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). • Compared with patients who withdrew NSAIDs, continuing NSAIDs in patients with stable AS receiving TNFi had no additional benefit in controlling disease activity. • The results of the present study provide evidence that supports withdrawal of NSAIDs in patients with stable AS receiving TNFi.
探讨非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)对接受肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗的稳定型强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者疾病活动度的影响。
本回顾性观察性研究共纳入 189 例接受 TNFi 治疗的稳定型 AS 患者。根据 NSAIDs 的使用情况,将患者分为 NSAIDs 停药组(n=48)和 NSAIDs 继续组(n=141)。每 3 个月测量红细胞沉降率(ESR)和 C 反应蛋白(CRP),每 6 个月测量 Bath 强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI),作为评估疾病活动度的参数。比较两组患者在每个时间点的 ESR、CRP 和 BASDAI,以及观察期间每个参数的时间平均值。采用重复测量方差分析比较两组患者观察期间疾病活动参数的变化。
两组患者基线和观察期间的 ESR、CRP 和 BASDAI 水平无差异。ESR(p=0.096)、CRP(p=0.136)和 BASDAI(p=0.421)的时间平均值以及 ESR(p=0.101)、CRP(p=0.714)和 BASDAI(p=0.613)在观察期间的变化在两组间无显著差异。
与停用 NSAIDs 的患者相比,在接受 TNFi 治疗的稳定型 AS 患者中继续使用 NSAIDs 并不能额外改善疾病活动度的控制。考虑到长期使用 NSAIDs 的毒性风险,在接受 TNFi 治疗的稳定型 AS 患者中停用 NSAIDs 可能更为可取。
对于接受肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗的稳定型强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者,继续或停用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的获益尚缺乏支持性证据。
与停用 NSAIDs 的患者相比,在接受 TNFi 治疗的稳定型 AS 患者中继续使用 NSAIDs 并不能额外改善疾病活动度的控制。
本研究结果为支持在接受 TNFi 治疗的稳定型 AS 患者中停用 NSAIDs 提供了证据。