• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一种综合设备诊断算法以对心力衰竭患者进行危险分层 - SCAN-HF 研究结果。

Evaluation of an Integrated Device Diagnostics Algorithm to Risk Stratify Heart Failure Patients - Results From the SCAN-HF Study.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital.

Department of Cardiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine.

出版信息

Circ J. 2020 Jun 25;84(7):1118-1123. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1143. Epub 2020 May 23.

DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1143
PMID:32448844
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Integrated device diagnostics, Triage-HF, is useful in risk stratifying patients with heart failure (HF), but its performance for Japanese patients remains unknown. This is a prospective study of Japanese patients treated with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D), with a Medtronic OptiVol 2.0 feature.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 320 CRT-D patients were enrolled from 2013 to 2017. All received HF treatment in the prior 12 months. Following enrollment, they were followed every 6 months for 48 months (mean, 22 months). Triage-HF-stratified patients at low, medium and high risk statuses at every 30-day period, and HF-related hospitalization occurring for the subsequent 30 days, were evaluated and repeated. The primary endpoint was to assess Triage-HF performance in predicting HF-related hospitalization risk. All device data were available for 279 of 320 patients (NYHA class II or III in 93%; mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 31%). During a total of 5,977 patient-month follow-ups, 89 HF-related hospitalization occurred in 72 patients. The unadjusted event numbers for Low, Medium and High statuses were 19 (0.7%), 42 (1.6%) and 28 (4.1%), respectively. Relative risk of Medium to Low status was 2.18 (95% CI 1.23-3.85) and 5.78 (95% CI 3.34-10.01) for High to Low status. Common contributing factors among the diagnostics included low activity, OptiVol threshold crossing, and elevated night heart rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Triage-HF effectively stratified Japanese patients at risk of HF-related hospitalization.

摘要

背景

综合设备诊断,即 Triage-HF,在对心力衰竭(HF)患者进行风险分层方面非常有用,但它在日本患者中的表现尚不清楚。这是一项前瞻性研究,纳入了 2013 年至 2017 年间接受心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)治疗的 320 例日本 HF 患者,这些患者均在过去 12 个月内接受了 HF 治疗。入组后,每 6 个月随访 48 个月(平均 22 个月)。在每个 30 天期间,对 Triage-HF 低、中、高风险分层的患者进行评估,并重复评估 HF 相关住院情况。主要终点是评估 Triage-HF 在预测 HF 相关住院风险方面的表现。279 例患者(93%为 NYHA Ⅱ或Ⅲ级;平均左心室射血分数为 31%)的所有设备数据均可用。在总共 5977 患者月的随访期间,72 例患者发生 89 例 HF 相关住院事件。低、中、高状态的未调整事件数分别为 19 例(0.7%)、42 例(1.6%)和 28 例(4.1%)。中危与低危状态的相对风险为 2.18(95%CI 1.23-3.85),高危与低危状态的相对风险为 5.78(95%CI 3.34-10.01)。诊断中常见的共同因素包括活动量低、OptiVol 阈值跨越和夜间心率升高。

结论

Triage-HF 可有效对 HF 相关住院风险分层的日本患者进行分层。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of an Integrated Device Diagnostics Algorithm to Risk Stratify Heart Failure Patients - Results From the SCAN-HF Study.评估一种综合设备诊断算法以对心力衰竭患者进行危险分层 - SCAN-HF 研究结果。
Circ J. 2020 Jun 25;84(7):1118-1123. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1143. Epub 2020 May 23.
2
Prospective evaluation of integrated device diagnostics for heart failure management: results of the TRIAGE-HF study.前瞻性评估心力衰竭管理中集成设备诊断:TRIAGE-HF 研究结果。
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Oct;5(5):809-817. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12309. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
3
Risk stratification of cardiovascular and heart failure hospitalizations using integrated device diagnostics in patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator.使用心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者的综合设备诊断进行心血管和心力衰竭住院的风险分层。
Europace. 2018 May 1;20(5):e69-e77. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux206.
4
Long-term impact of intrathoracic impedance findings on survival and heart failure hospitalizations after cardiac resynchronization therapy in ICD Registry patients.ICD 注册研究患者心脏再同步治疗后胸腔内阻抗结果对生存和心力衰竭住院的长期影响。
Europace. 2018 Jul 1;20(7):1138-1145. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux197.
5
Refined heart failure detection algorithm for improved clinical reliability of OptiVol alerts in CRT-D recipients.用于提高心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)植入者中OptiVol警报临床可靠性的优化心力衰竭检测算法。
Cardiol J. 2018;25(2):236-244. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0077. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
6
A novel algorithm to assess risk of heart failure exacerbation using ICD diagnostics: validation from RAFT.一种使用植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)诊断来评估心力衰竭恶化风险的新算法:来自RAFT研究的验证
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Sep;11(9):1626-31. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 May 17.
7
Combined heart failure device diagnostics identify patients at higher risk of subsequent heart failure hospitalizations: results from PARTNERS HF (Program to Access and Review Trending Information and Evaluate Correlation to Symptoms in Patients With Heart Failure) study.心脏衰竭装置联合诊断可识别出后续有更高心力衰竭住院风险的患者:来自 PARTNERS HF(心力衰竭患者趋势信息获取、评估和症状相关性研究计划)研究的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 27;55(17):1803-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.089.
8
Development of a method to risk stratify patients with heart failure for 30-day readmission using implantable device diagnostics.利用植入式设备诊断开发一种对心力衰竭患者进行 30 天再入院风险分层的方法。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jan 1;111(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.050. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
9
Remotely Monitored Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Data Predict All-Cause and Cardiovascular Unplanned Hospitalization.远程监测心脏植入式电子设备数据可预测全因和心血管非计划性住院。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;11(16):e024526. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024526. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
10
Temporal Influence of Heart Failure Hospitalizations Prior to Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Defibrillator on Subsequent Outcome in Mild Heart Failure Patients (from MADIT-CRT).在轻度心力衰竭患者中(来自MADIT-CRT研究),植入式心律转复除颤器或心脏再同步化治疗除颤器之前心力衰竭住院对后续结局的时间影响
Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 15;115(10):1423-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Triage-HF Validation in Heart Failure Clinical Practice: Importance of Episode Duration.心力衰竭临床实践中的分诊-心力衰竭验证:发作持续时间的重要性。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 10;15(12):1476. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15121476.
2
Comparative Diagnostic Efficacy of HeartLogic and TriageHF Algorithms in Remote Monitoring of Heart Failure: A Cohort Study.HeartLogic与TriageHF算法在心力衰竭远程监测中的比较诊断效能:一项队列研究
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 May 31;12(6):209. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12060209.
3
Efficacy of the Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Multisensory Triage-HF Algorithm in Heart Failure Care: A Real-World Clinical Experience.
心脏植入式电子设备多感觉分诊-HF 算法在心力衰竭治疗中的疗效:真实世界的临床经验。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 5;24(11):3664. doi: 10.3390/s24113664.