Suppr超能文献

生活在支持性住所中的严重精神疾病患者的生活质量结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Quality of life outcomes for people with serious mental illness living in supported accommodation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Queen Margaret University Drive, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, UK.

Mental Health, Activity and Participation (MAP), Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;55(8):977-988. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01885-x. Epub 2020 May 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life (QoL) outcomes for people with serious mental illness living in three types of supported accommodation.

METHODS

Studies were identified that described QoL outcomes for people with serious mental illness living in supported accommodation in six electronic databases. We applied a random-effects model to derive the meta-analytic results.

RESULTS

13 studies from 7 countries were included, with 3276 participants receiving high support (457), supported housing (1576) and floating outreach (1243). QoL outcomes related to wellbeing, living conditions and social functioning were compared between different supported accommodation types. Living condition outcomes were better for people living in supported housing ([Formula: see text]= - 0.31; CI = [- 0.47; - 0.16]) and floating outreach ([Formula: see text]= - 0.95; CI = [- 1.30; - 0.61]) compared to high-support accommodation, with a medium effect size for living condition outcomes between supported housing and floating outreach ([Formula: see text]= - 0.40; CI = [- 0.82; 0.03]), indicating that living conditions are better for people living in floating outreach. Social functioning outcomes were significant for people living in supported housing compared to high support ([Formula: see text] = - 0.37; CI = [- 0.65; - 0.09]), with wellbeing outcomes not significant between the three types of supported accommodation.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence that satisfaction with living conditions differs across supported accommodation types. The results suggest there is a need to focus on improving social functioning and wellbeing outcomes for people with serious mental illness across supported accommodation types.

摘要

目的

系统评价和荟萃分析三种不同类型的支持性住宿环境对患有严重精神疾病的人群生活质量(QoL)的影响。

方法

检索了六个电子数据库中描述了患有严重精神疾病的人在支持性住宿环境中生活的 QoL 结果的研究。我们应用随机效应模型得出荟萃分析结果。

结果

纳入了来自 7 个国家的 13 项研究,共有 3276 名参与者接受了高支持(457 人)、支持性住房(1576 人)和浮动外展(1243 人)。比较了不同支持性住宿类型之间与幸福感、生活条件和社会功能相关的 QoL 结果。与高支持住宿相比,生活条件结果对居住在支持性住房([公式:见文本]=-0.31;CI= [-0.47;-0.16])和浮动外展([公式:见文本]=-0.95;CI= [-1.30;-0.61])的人群更好,支持性住房和浮动外展之间的生活条件结果具有中等效应大小([公式:见文本]=-0.40;CI= [-0.82;0.03]),表明居住在浮动外展的人群的生活条件更好。与高支持相比,支持性住房的社会功能结果对人群有显著影响([公式:见文本] =-0.37;CI= [-0.65;-0.09]),而三种支持性住宿类型之间的幸福感结果没有显著差异。

结论

有证据表明,不同支持性住宿类型的居住条件满意度存在差异。结果表明,需要关注改善患有严重精神疾病的人群在所有支持性住宿类型中的社会功能和幸福感结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df5e/7395041/db80d80555ac/127_2020_1885_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验