• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教育中的智能无障碍与生活质量:青少年支持与普遍接入的系统综述

Smart Accessibility and Quality of Life in Education: A Systematic Review of Adolescent Support and Universal Access.

作者信息

Alhasan Naeema Abdulrahman, Lombardi Marco, Al-Ajmi Nasser Saad

机构信息

Department of Special Education, College of Education, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

Department of Social Education Care Work and Equality Research, Hogent University, Ghent, BEL.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Feb 23;17(2):e79494. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79494. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.79494
PMID:40135008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11934294/
Abstract

The accelerated digitalization of secondary education following the COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally altered the nature of learner engagement and participation with various knowledge resources. From digital lessons to gamification to integrated smart technologies capable of supporting specific learner needs, the opportunity for inclusion and universal accessibility is unprecedented. This study represents an important extension of prior research in this field, combining multiple empirical studies regarding smart technologies, accessibility effects, and learner quality of life (QoL) into a blueprint for future educational applications. Through a systematic literature review (SLR), studies from multiple databases using multiple empirical methods have been identified and thematically compared. The findings reveal that while smart technologies have the potential to revolutionize inclusive education, accessibility gaps persist, particularly for students with special needs, leading to disparities in learning opportunities and outcomes. Such gaps stem from insufficiently adaptive technologies, inadequate teacher training, and limited resource allocation for underserved communities. By targeting a bottom-up, participative design approach to technological identification and integration, a broader range of student needs can be accommodated, and technological accessibility can be ensured for a larger percentage of the secondary student population. This study recommends improving educational outcomes for all students, especially those with special needs, by prioritizing the development of adaptable, inclusive technologies and continuous utility assessments. This research synthesizes findings from multiple studies to evaluate the impact of smart accessibility on adolescent learning and quality of life, providing a framework for assessing and improving technological integration in secondary education.

摘要

新冠疫情之后,中等教育加速数字化,从根本上改变了学习者参与并利用各种知识资源的方式。从数字课程到游戏化,再到能够满足学习者特定需求的集成智能技术,实现包容性和普遍可及性的机会空前巨大。本研究是该领域先前研究的重要延伸,它将关于智能技术、可及性影响和学习者生活质量(QoL)的多项实证研究整合为未来教育应用的蓝图。通过系统的文献综述(SLR),已识别并按主题比较了来自多个数据库、采用多种实证方法的研究。研究结果表明,虽然智能技术有潜力变革全纳教育,但可及性差距依然存在,尤其是对有特殊需求的学生而言,这导致了学习机会和成果的差异。此类差距源于技术适应性不足、教师培训不够以及对服务不足社区的资源分配有限。通过采用自下而上的参与式设计方法来确定技术并进行整合,可以满足更广泛的学生需求,并确保更大比例的中学生能够使用技术。本研究建议,通过优先开发适应性强、具有包容性的技术以及持续进行效用评估,提高所有学生尤其是有特殊需求学生的教育成果。本研究综合多项研究的结果,以评估智能可及性对青少年学习和生活质量的影响,为评估和改进中等教育中的技术整合提供了一个框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e4/11934294/8372cf9719ed/cureus-0017-00000079494-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e4/11934294/c8d76a603406/cureus-0017-00000079494-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e4/11934294/6c98c432585f/cureus-0017-00000079494-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e4/11934294/f2a42557e627/cureus-0017-00000079494-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e4/11934294/6a6f809e5162/cureus-0017-00000079494-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e4/11934294/34f370d9e02c/cureus-0017-00000079494-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e4/11934294/8372cf9719ed/cureus-0017-00000079494-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e4/11934294/c8d76a603406/cureus-0017-00000079494-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e4/11934294/6c98c432585f/cureus-0017-00000079494-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e4/11934294/f2a42557e627/cureus-0017-00000079494-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e4/11934294/6a6f809e5162/cureus-0017-00000079494-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e4/11934294/34f370d9e02c/cureus-0017-00000079494-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e4/11934294/8372cf9719ed/cureus-0017-00000079494-i06.jpg

相似文献

1
Smart Accessibility and Quality of Life in Education: A Systematic Review of Adolescent Support and Universal Access.教育中的智能无障碍与生活质量:青少年支持与普遍接入的系统综述
Cureus. 2025 Feb 23;17(2):e79494. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79494. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
3
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Exploring technology use among older adults with intellectual disabilities: barriers, opportunities, and the role of advanced technologies.探索智障老年人的技术使用情况:障碍、机遇及先进技术的作用。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Apr 28:1-12. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2025.2498566.
5
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
6
Navigating the digital shift in radiologic technology education: Distance learning and its implications: A narrative literature review.应对放射技术教育中的数字化转变:远程学习及其影响:一篇叙述性文献综述
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2025 Apr 3;56(4):101895. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2025.101895.
7
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
8
Longitudinal Coadaptation of Older Adults With Wearables and Voice-Activated Virtual Assistants: Scoping Review.老年人穿戴设备和语音激活虚拟助手的纵向协同适应:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 7;26:e57258. doi: 10.2196/57258.
9
Social Inclusion for People with Intellectual Disability and on the Autism Spectrum through Assistive Technologies: Current Needs and Future Priorities.通过辅助技术促进智障和自闭症谱系障碍患者的社会包容:当前需求与未来重点
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 May;20(4):917-929. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2414414. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
10
Little Patients, Big Tasks - A Pediatric Emergency Medicine Escape Room.小患者,大任务——一场儿科急诊医学密室逃脱游戏
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 31;8(4):SG1-SG19. doi: 10.21980/J89W70. eCollection 2023 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
The Quality of Life Supports Model as a Vehicle for Implementing Rights.作为实现权利手段的生活质量支持模式
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Apr 28;13(5):365. doi: 10.3390/bs13050365.
2
Smart-speaker technology and intellectual disabilities: agency and wellbeing.智能扬声器技术与智力残疾:能动性与福祉。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 May;18(4):432-442. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1864670. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
3
A Systematic Review of the Assessment of Support Needs in People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
智力和发育障碍人群支持需求评估的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 18;17(24):9494. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249494.
4
School quality of life: Cross-national comparison of students' perspectives.学校生活质量:学生视角的跨国比较。
Work. 2020;67(3):573-581. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203310.
5
Quality of life outcomes for people with serious mental illness living in supported accommodation: systematic review and meta-analysis.生活在支持性住所中的严重精神疾病患者的生活质量结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;55(8):977-988. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01885-x. Epub 2020 May 24.
6
Assistive technology applications for students with reading difficulties: special education teachers' experiences and perceptions.针对阅读困难学生的辅助技术应用:特殊教育教师的经验与看法。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Nov;14(8):798-808. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1499142. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
7
Impact of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on Self-Determination: A Randomized-Trial Control Group Study.自主学习教学模式对自主学习的影响:一项随机试验对照组研究。
Except Child. 2012 Winter;78(2):135-153. doi: 10.1177/001440291207800201.