• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水资源短缺与水质:在坦桑尼亚农村地区实施生物砂滤器过程中识别潜在的意外危害及缓解策略

Water Scarcity and Water Quality: Identifying Potential Unintended Harms and Mitigation Strategies in the Implementation of the Biosand Filter in Rural Tanzania.

作者信息

Hovden Lise, Paasche Tina, Nyanza Elias Charles, Bastien Sheri

机构信息

Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Bø municipality, Vesteralen, Norway.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2020 Sep;30(11):1647-1661. doi: 10.1177/1049732320918860. Epub 2020 May 25.

DOI:10.1177/1049732320918860
PMID:32449474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7410274/
Abstract

Bottom-up public health interventions are needed which are built on an understanding of community perspectives. Project SHINE is a community-based participatory action research intervention focused on developing sustainable water, sanitation, and hygiene strategies with Maasai pastoralists in Tanzania. The aim of the study is to understand perceptions related to water quality and scarcity as well as to assess the potential of the Biosand Filter as a low-cost, low-tech water treatment option. To avoid unintended harms, the community was engaged in identifying potential harms and mitigation strategies prior to the implementation of the filter.Two in-depth interviews and two group discussions were analyzed using thematic content analysis, while three think tanks were analyzed using directed content analysis. The findings highlight a range of concerns regarding water scarcity and quality. The think tank approach was an effective means of engaging the community in identifying potential unintended harms across four dimensions: the physical, psychosocial, economic, and cultural contexts. In addition, two external themes emerged as salient: political harm and harm by omission.

摘要

需要自下而上的公共卫生干预措施,这些措施应建立在对社区观点的理解之上。“SHINE项目”是一项基于社区的参与式行动研究干预措施,重点是与坦桑尼亚的马赛牧民一起制定可持续的水、环境卫生和个人卫生战略。该研究的目的是了解与水质和水资源短缺相关的看法,并评估生物砂滤池作为一种低成本、低技术的水处理选项的潜力。为避免意外危害,在安装滤池之前,让社区参与识别潜在危害和缓解策略。使用主题内容分析法对两次深度访谈和两次小组讨论进行了分析,同时使用定向内容分析法对三次智囊团讨论进行了分析。研究结果突出了一系列关于水资源短缺和水质的担忧。智囊团方法是让社区参与识别四个维度(身体、心理社会、经济和文化背景)潜在意外危害的有效手段。此外,还出现了两个突出的外部主题:政治危害和疏忽造成的危害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd22/7410274/3407838016aa/10.1177_1049732320918860-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd22/7410274/3407838016aa/10.1177_1049732320918860-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd22/7410274/3407838016aa/10.1177_1049732320918860-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Water Scarcity and Water Quality: Identifying Potential Unintended Harms and Mitigation Strategies in the Implementation of the Biosand Filter in Rural Tanzania.水资源短缺与水质:在坦桑尼亚农村地区实施生物砂滤器过程中识别潜在的意外危害及缓解策略
Qual Health Res. 2020 Sep;30(11):1647-1661. doi: 10.1177/1049732320918860. Epub 2020 May 25.
2
An Application of the Integrated Behavioral Model for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene to Assess Perceived Community Acceptability and Feasibility of the Biosand Filter among Maasai Pastoralists in Rural Tanzania.综合行为模型在水、环境卫生和个人卫生领域的应用,评估坦桑尼亚农村地区马赛游牧民对生物砂滤器的感知社区可接受性和可行性。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Nov 8;106(2):464-478. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0398.
3
Participatory science and innovation for improved sanitation and hygiene: process and outcome evaluation of project SHINE, a school-based intervention in Rural Tanzania.参与式科学与创新促进卫生与环境卫生改善:坦桑尼亚农村学校干预项目SHINE的过程与结果评估
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 7;17(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4100-7.
4
From Arts to Action: Project SHINE as a Case Study of Engaging Youth in Efforts to Develop Sustainable Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Strategies in Rural Tanzania and India从艺术到行动:“闪耀计划”作为让青年参与坦桑尼亚农村和印度可持续水、环境卫生及个人卫生战略制定工作的案例研究
5
Towards a participatory framework for improving water & health outcomes: A case study with Maasai women in rural Tanzania.迈向改善水与健康成果的参与式框架:坦桑尼亚农村马赛妇女的案例研究
Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;301:114966. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114966. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
6
Understanding the Challenges of Improving Sanitation and Hygiene Outcomes in a Community Based Intervention: A Cross-Sectional Study in Rural Tanzania.了解社区干预中改善环境卫生结果的挑战:坦桑尼亚农村的一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 5;14(6):602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060602.
7
Gender dynamics of community-led total sanitation interventions in Mpwapwa District, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚姆普瓦普瓦区社区主导的全面卫生干预措施中的性别动态
Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan;18(1):2053733. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2053733. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
8
The influence of community factors in the implementation of community-based interventions to improve antenatal care: a qualitative study based on the IMCHA programme in Tanzania.社区因素对实施以社区为基础的干预措施以改善产前保健的影响:基于坦桑尼亚 IMCHA 项目的定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2021 Sep 22;18(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01225-5.
9
Access to Safe Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene: A Cross-Sectional Study among the Maasai in Tanzania.安全水供应、卫生设施和个人卫生:坦桑尼亚马赛人中的一项横断面研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Mar 1;104(4):1535-1539. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0134.
10
Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: A Mixed Methods Study of Health-Related Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) for Indigenous Shawi in the Peruvian Amazon.实现可持续发展目标:对秘鲁亚马逊地区沙维族原住民的与健康相关的水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)的混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 8;16(13):2429. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132429.

引用本文的文献

1
The Perception of Water Contamination and Risky Consumption in El Salvador from a Community Clinical Psychology Perspective.从社区临床心理学的角度看萨尔瓦多民众对水污染的认知和危险饮水行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 19;19(3):1109. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031109.
2
An Application of the Integrated Behavioral Model for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene to Assess Perceived Community Acceptability and Feasibility of the Biosand Filter among Maasai Pastoralists in Rural Tanzania.综合行为模型在水、环境卫生和个人卫生领域的应用,评估坦桑尼亚农村地区马赛游牧民对生物砂滤器的感知社区可接受性和可行性。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Nov 8;106(2):464-478. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0398.

本文引用的文献

1
India's achievement towards sustainable Development Goal 6 (Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all) in the 2030 Agenda.印度在 2030 年议程中实现可持续发展目标 6(确保所有人都能获得和可持续地管理水和环境卫生)的情况。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;22(1):2142. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14316-0.
2
An Application of the Integrated Behavioral Model for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene to Assess Perceived Community Acceptability and Feasibility of the Biosand Filter among Maasai Pastoralists in Rural Tanzania.综合行为模型在水、环境卫生和个人卫生领域的应用,评估坦桑尼亚农村地区马赛游牧民对生物砂滤器的感知社区可接受性和可行性。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Nov 8;106(2):464-478. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0398.
3
Reflexive Intervention Development: Using Qualitative Research to Inform the Development of an Intervention for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.
反思性干预措施开发:利用定性研究为转移性乳腺癌女性干预措施的开发提供信息。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Apr;30(5):666-678. doi: 10.1177/1049732319884901. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
4
Participatory science and innovation for improved sanitation and hygiene: process and outcome evaluation of project SHINE, a school-based intervention in Rural Tanzania.参与式科学与创新促进卫生与环境卫生改善:坦桑尼亚农村学校干预项目SHINE的过程与结果评估
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 7;17(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4100-7.
5
Adding Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research to Health Intervention Studies: Interacting With Differences.将定性和混合方法研究纳入健康干预研究:应对差异
Qual Health Res. 2016 Apr;26(5):587-602. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617479. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
6
'WE CAN'T GET WORMS FROM COW DUNG': REPORTED KNOWLEDGE OF PARASITISM AMONG PASTORALIST YOUTH ATTENDING SECONDARY SCHOOL IN THE NGORONGORO CONSERVATION AREA, TANZANIA.“我们不会从牛粪中感染寄生虫”:坦桑尼亚恩戈罗恩戈罗保护区中学就读的牧民青年对寄生虫感染的认知报告
J Biosoc Sci. 2016 Nov;48(6):746-66. doi: 10.1017/S0021932015000358. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
7
Sustainability and scale-up of household water treatment and safe storage practices: Enablers and barriers to effective implementation.家庭水处理与安全储存措施的可持续性及扩大规模:有效实施的推动因素与障碍
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2015 Nov;218(8):704-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
8
Evidence and harm: time for reflection.证据与危害:反思的时候到了。
Int J Public Health. 2014 Feb;59(1):1-2. doi: 10.1007/s00038-013-0534-6.
9
A scoping review of unintended harm associated with public health interventions: towards a typology and an understanding of underlying factors.一项关于公共卫生干预措施相关的非预期伤害的范围综述:朝向一个分类法和对潜在因素的理解。
Int J Public Health. 2014 Feb;59(1):3-14. doi: 10.1007/s00038-013-0526-6. Epub 2014 Jan 1.
10
Adverse effects of public health interventions: a conceptual framework.公共卫生干预措施的不良影响:概念框架。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Mar;68(3):288-90. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203118. Epub 2013 Dec 13.