Department of Psychology, Bath Spa University, Bath, UK.
Occup Med (Lond). 2020 Jun 20;70(4):268-277. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqaa066.
Chronic pain (CP) remains the second commonest reason for being off work. Tertiary return to work (RTW) interventions aim to improve psychological and physical capacity amongst workers already off sick. Their effectiveness for workers with CP is unclear.
To explore which tertiary interventions effectively promote RTW for CP sufferers.
We searched eight databases for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of tertiary RTW interventions for CP sufferers. We employed the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) and methodological quality assessment tools for all included papers. We synthesized findings narratively. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity of study characteristics.
We included 16 papers pertaining to 13 trials. The types, delivery format and follow-up schedules of RTW interventions varied greatly. Most treatments were multidisciplinary, comprising psychological, physical and workplace elements. Five trials reported that tertiary interventions with multidisciplinary elements promoted RTW for workers with CP compared to controls. We gave a high ROB rating for one or more assessment criteria to three out of the five successful intervention trials. Two had medium- and low-risk elements across all categories. One compared different intensity multidisciplinary treatment and one comprised work-hardening with a job coach. Seven trials found treatment effects for secondary outcomes but no RTW improvement.
There is no conclusive evidence to support any specific tertiary RTW intervention for workers with CP, but multidisciplinary efforts should be considered. Workers' compensation is an important area for RTW policymakers to consider.
慢性疼痛(CP)仍然是第二常见的缺勤原因。三级重返工作岗位(RTW)干预旨在提高已经患病的工人的心理和身体能力。它们对 CP 患者的有效性尚不清楚。
探索哪些三级干预措施能有效地促进 CP 患者重返工作岗位。
我们在八个数据库中搜索了评估三级 RTW 干预措施对 CP 患者有效性的随机对照试验。我们对所有纳入的论文使用了 Cochrane 风险偏倚(ROB)和方法学质量评估工具。我们对发现进行了叙述性综合。由于研究特征的异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。
我们纳入了 16 篇涉及 13 项试验的论文。RTW 干预措施的类型、交付形式和随访计划差异很大。大多数治疗是多学科的,包括心理、身体和工作场所因素。五项试验报告称,与对照组相比,具有多学科要素的三级干预措施促进了 CP 患者的 RTW。我们对五个成功干预试验中的三个之一或多个评估标准给予了高 ROB 评级。其中两个在所有类别中都有中低风险因素。其中一个比较了不同强度的多学科治疗,另一个则包括工作强化和职业教练。七项试验发现了次要结果的治疗效果,但没有改善 RTW。
没有确凿的证据支持任何特定的 CP 患者三级 RTW 干预措施,但应考虑多学科努力。工人赔偿是 RTW 政策制定者需要考虑的一个重要领域。