• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对基线乳酸脱氢酶升高的黑色素瘤患者联合使用BRAF和MEK抑制剂的间接比较

Indirect Comparison of Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition in Melanoma Patients with Elevated Baseline Lactate Dehydrogenase.

作者信息

Glutsch Valerie, Amaral Teresa, Garbe Claus, Thoms Kai-Martin, Mohr Peter, Hauschild Axel, Schilling Bastian

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2, DE-97080 Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Derm Venereol. 2020 Jun 11;100(13):adv00174. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3526.

DOI:10.2340/00015555-3526
PMID:32449784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9175049/
Abstract

The approval of BRAF and MEK inhibitors has significantly improved treatment outcomes for patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. The 3 first-line targeted therapy trials have provided similar results, and thus the identification of predictive biomarkers may generate a more precise basis for clinical decision-making. Elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) has already been determined as a strong prognostic factor. Therefore, this indirect analysis compared subgroups with elevated baseline LDH across the pivotal targeted therapy trials co-BRIM, COMBI-v and COLUMBUS part 1. The Bucher method was used to compare progression-free survival, objective response rate and overall survival indirectly. The results show a non-significant risk reduction for progression in the subgroup with elevated baseline LDH receiving vemurafenib plus cobimetinib compared with dabrafenib plus trametinib and encorafenib plus binimetinib. Although an indirect comparison, these data might provide some guidance for treatment recommendations in melanoma patients with elevated LDH.

摘要

BRAF和MEK抑制剂的获批显著改善了BRAF突变型转移性黑色素瘤患者的治疗效果。三项一线靶向治疗试验取得了相似的结果,因此,预测性生物标志物的鉴定可能为临床决策提供更精确的依据。基线乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)升高已被确定为一个强有力的预后因素。因此,这项间接分析比较了关键靶向治疗试验co-BRIM、COMBI-v和COLUMBUS第1部分中基线LDH升高的亚组。采用布彻方法间接比较无进展生存期、客观缓解率和总生存期。结果显示,与达拉非尼加曲美替尼以及恩考芬尼加比美替尼相比,基线LDH升高的亚组接受维莫非尼加考比替尼治疗时进展风险降低不显著。尽管是间接比较,但这些数据可能为LDH升高的黑色素瘤患者的治疗建议提供一些指导。

相似文献

1
Indirect Comparison of Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition in Melanoma Patients with Elevated Baseline Lactate Dehydrogenase.对基线乳酸脱氢酶升高的黑色素瘤患者联合使用BRAF和MEK抑制剂的间接比较
Acta Derm Venereol. 2020 Jun 11;100(13):adv00174. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3526.
2
Comparison of dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy with vemurafenib monotherapy on health-related quality of life in patients with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous BRAF Val600-mutation-positive melanoma (COMBI-v): results of a phase 3, open-label, randomised trial.达拉非尼联合曲美替尼与维莫非尼单药治疗不可切除或转移性皮肤 BRAF Val600 突变阳性黑色素瘤患者的健康相关生活质量比较(COMBI-v):一项开放标签、随机、3 期临床试验结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1389-98. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00087-X.
3
Modeled Prognostic Subgroups for Survival and Treatment Outcomes in BRAF V600-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma: Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials.BRAF V600 突变型转移性黑色素瘤生存和治疗结局的建模预后亚组:4 项随机临床试验的汇总分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1382-1388. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2668.
4
Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.恩考芬尼加比美替尼与维莫非尼或恩考芬尼用于治疗 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤患者(COLUMBUS):一项多中心、开放标签、随机 3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):603-615. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30142-6. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
5
Five-Year Outcomes with Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Metastatic Melanoma.达拉非尼联合曲美替尼治疗转移性黑色素瘤的 5 年结果。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):626-636. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904059. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
6
Network indirect comparison of 3 BRAF + MEK inhibitors for the treatment of advanced BRAF mutated melanoma.3种BRAF+MEK抑制剂治疗晚期BRAF突变黑色素瘤的网状间接比较
Clin Transl Oncol. 2020 Jun;22(6):900-907. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02207-7. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
7
Overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.接受恩考芬尼加比美替尼与维莫非尼或恩考芬尼治疗的 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤患者的总生存期:一项多中心、开放标签、随机、III 期试验(COLUMBUS)。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1315-1327. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30497-2. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
8
Dabrafenib plus trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma: long-term survival and safety analysis of a phase 3 study.达拉非尼联合曲美替尼与达拉非尼单药治疗转移性BRAF V600E/K突变黑色素瘤患者:一项3期研究的长期生存和安全性分析
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(7):1631-1639. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx176.
9
COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With V600-Mutant Melanoma.COLUMBUS 5 年更新:依维莫司或恩考芬尼联合比尼替尼对比维莫非尼用于 V600 突变型黑色素瘤患者的随机、开放标签、III 期试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 20;40(36):4178-4188. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02659. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
10
Outcomes in patients with -mutated melanoma and brain metastases at baseline treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib.基线时接受达拉非尼联合曲美替尼治疗的 - 突变型黑色素瘤和脑转移患者的结局。
Tumori. 2023 Dec;109(6):537-545. doi: 10.1177/03008916231179251. Epub 2023 Jul 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy after radiologic progression on targeted therapy in stage IV melanoma.在晚期黑色素瘤的靶向治疗中,影像学进展后 PD-1 免疫治疗的疗效。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jul;116:207-215. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
2
First-line therapy-stratified survival in BRAF-mutant melanoma: a retrospective multicenter analysis.一线治疗分层的 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤患者的生存情况:一项回顾性多中心分析。
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019 May;68(5):765-772. doi: 10.1007/s00262-019-02311-1. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
3
Overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.
接受恩考芬尼加比美替尼与维莫非尼或恩考芬尼治疗的 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤患者的总生存期:一项多中心、开放标签、随机、III 期试验(COLUMBUS)。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1315-1327. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30497-2. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
Modeled Prognostic Subgroups for Survival and Treatment Outcomes in BRAF V600-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma: Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials.BRAF V600 突变型转移性黑色素瘤生存和治疗结局的建模预后亚组:4 项随机临床试验的汇总分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1382-1388. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2668.
5
The eighth edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma staging system: implications for melanoma treatment and care.第八版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)黑色素瘤分期系统:对黑色素瘤治疗和护理的影响。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018 Aug;18(8):775-784. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1489246.
6
The impact of patient characteristics and disease-specific factors on first-line treatment decisions for BRAF-mutated melanoma: results from a European expert panel study.患者特征和疾病特异性因素对BRAF突变型黑色素瘤一线治疗决策的影响:一项欧洲专家小组研究的结果
Melanoma Res. 2018 Aug;28(4):333-340. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000455.
7
Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.恩考芬尼加比美替尼与维莫非尼或恩考芬尼用于治疗 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤患者(COLUMBUS):一项多中心、开放标签、随机 3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):603-615. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30142-6. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
8
Three-year pooled analysis of factors associated with clinical outcomes across dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy phase 3 randomised trials.达拉非尼和曲美替尼联合治疗3期随机试验中与临床结局相关因素的三年汇总分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;82:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.033. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
9
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Proton Pump Inhibitors: An Evaluation of Treatment Options.酪氨酸激酶抑制剂与质子泵抑制剂:治疗方案评估
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Jul;56(7):683-688. doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0503-3.
10
Indirect treatment comparison of dabrafenib plus trametinib versus vemurafenib plus cobimetinib in previously untreated metastatic melanoma patients.达拉非尼联合曲美替尼与维莫非尼联合考比替尼用于既往未治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者的间接治疗比较
J Hematol Oncol. 2017 Jan 4;10(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0369-8.