• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[2型糖尿病对冠心病患者冠状动脉非靶病变进展及血管重建的影响]

[Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on the progression and revascularization of coronary non-target lesions in patients with coronary heart disease].

作者信息

Wang J, Xu H B, Zhang H P, Chen J L, Qiao S B, Hu F H, Yang W X, Yuan J S, Liu R, Cui J G, Guo C, Duan X, Gao L J

机构信息

Coronary Heart Disease Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020 May 24;48(5):393-400. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20190425-00204.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20190425-00204
PMID:32450656
Abstract

To investigate the impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on progression and revascularization of coronary non-target lesions in patients with coronary heart disease. From January 2010 to September 2014, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with coronary heart disease who underwent two consecutive coronary angiographies at Fuwai Hospital. At least one coronary non-target lesion was recorded at the first procedure in these patients. Patients were grouped according to the diagnose of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Demographic features, risk factors of coronary heart disease, laboratory results as well as characteristics of coronary non-target lesions were collected at baseline (first coronary angiography) and follow-up (second coronary angiography). Lesion progression was defined by quantitative coronary angiography analysis. Lesions revascularization was recorded. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to define the impacts of diabetes mellitus on progression and revascularization of non-target lesions. Subgroup analysis in diabetic and non-diabetic groups were further performed. Receiver operating characteristics curve was used to identify the predictive value of HbA1c. A total of 1 255 patients were included, and 1 003(79.9%) were male, age was(58.0±9.7) years old. And 486 patients were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Follow-up time was (14.8±4.5) months. Compared with non-diabetic group, diabetic group were older with less male and had higher BMI index as well as higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, prior myocardial infarction and prior percutaneous coronary intervention(all 0.05). Diabetic patients also had higher level of white blood cells, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, endothelin and HbA1c at both baseline and follow-up compared with non-diabetic patients (all 0.01). There was no significant difference on progression of non-target lesions (20.0%(97/486) vs. 18.5%(142/769), 0.512), revascularization of non-target lesions (13.2%(64/486) vs. 15.9%(122/769), 0.190) and non-target lesion related myocardial infarction(1.9%(9/486) vs. 1.3%(10/769), 0.436) between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus was not an independent predictor for progression and revascularization of non-target lesions (Both 0.05). Subgroup analysis in diabetic patients showed that baseline HbA1c level(=1.160, 95 1.009-1.333, 0.037) was an independent predictor for non-target lesion progression. Cut-off value of HbA1c was 6.5% (Area Under Curve(AUC) 0.57, specificity 88.7%; sensitivity 24.2%, 0.046) by receiver operating characteristics curve. Patients with HbA1c level above 6.5% had 2.8 times higher risk of lesion progression compared with patients with HbA1c level below 6.5% (=2.838, 95 1.505-5.349, 0.001). Compared with non-diabetic patients, diabetic patients with HbA1c below 6.5% also had lower risk of lesion progression (=0.469, 95 0.252-0.872, 0.012). ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction was an independent predictor for revascularization of non-target lesions in diabetic patients. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is not an independent predictor for progression and revascularization of coronary non-target lesions in patients with coronary heart disease. However, elevated HbA1c level is a risk factor for progression of non-target lesion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

摘要

探讨2型糖尿病对冠心病患者冠状动脉非靶病变进展及血运重建的影响。2010年1月至2014年9月,我们回顾性分析了在阜外医院连续接受两次冠状动脉造影的冠心病患者的临床资料。这些患者在首次检查时至少记录有一处冠状动脉非靶病变。根据2型糖尿病诊断将患者分组。在基线(首次冠状动脉造影)和随访(第二次冠状动脉造影)时收集人口统计学特征、冠心病危险因素、实验室检查结果以及冠状动脉非靶病变特征。通过定量冠状动脉造影分析定义病变进展情况。记录病变血运重建情况。采用多变量Cox回归分析确定糖尿病对非靶病变进展及血运重建的影响。进一步在糖尿病组和非糖尿病组中进行亚组分析。采用受试者工作特征曲线确定糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的预测价值。共纳入1255例患者,其中男性1003例(79.9%),年龄为(58.0±9.7)岁。486例患者被诊断为2型糖尿病。随访时间为(14.8±4.5)个月。与非糖尿病组相比,糖尿病组年龄更大,男性更少,体重指数更高,高血压、血脂异常、既往心肌梗死及既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患病率更高(均P<0.05)。糖尿病患者在基线和随访时白细胞、红细胞沉降率、C反应蛋白、内皮素及HbA1c水平也高于非糖尿病患者(均P<0.01)。糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者在非靶病变进展(20.0%(97/486)对18.5%(142/769),P=0.512)、非靶病变血运重建(13.2%(64/486)对15.9%(122/769),P=0.190)及非靶病变相关心肌梗死(1.9%(9/486)对1.3%(10/769),P=0.436)方面无显著差异。多变量Cox回归分析显示,糖尿病不是非靶病变进展及血运重建的独立预测因素(均P>0.05)。糖尿病患者亚组分析显示,基线HbA1c水平(β=1.160,95%CI 1.009-1.333,P=0.037)是非靶病变进展的独立预测因素。通过受试者工作特征曲线,HbA1c的截断值为6.5%(曲线下面积(AUC)0.57,特异性88.7%;敏感性24.2%,P=0.046)。HbA1c水平高于6.5%的患者病变进展风险是HbA1c水平低于6.5%患者的2.8倍(β=2.838,95%CI 1.505-5.349,P=0.001)。与非糖尿病患者相比,HbA1c低于6.5%的糖尿病患者病变进展风险也更低(β=0.469,95%CI 0.252-0.872,P=0.012)。ST段抬高型心肌梗死是糖尿病患者非靶病变血运重建情况的独立预测因素。2型糖尿病不是冠心病患者冠状动脉非靶病变进展及血运重建的独立预测因素。然而,HbA1c水平升高是2型糖尿病患者非靶病变进展的危险因素。

相似文献

1
[Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on the progression and revascularization of coronary non-target lesions in patients with coronary heart disease].[2型糖尿病对冠心病患者冠状动脉非靶病变进展及血管重建的影响]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020 May 24;48(5):393-400. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20190425-00204.
2
[Clinical characteristics and prognosis between male and female patients with premature coronary artery disease after intervention].[干预后早发冠心病男性与女性患者的临床特征及预后]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 24;47(10):798-805. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2019.10.006.
3
The natural course of nonculprit coronary artery lesions; analysis by serial quantitative coronary angiography.非罪犯冠状动脉病变的自然病程;通过系列定量冠状动脉造影进行分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0870-9.
4
Impact of angiographic and intravascular ultrasound features on clinical outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de-novo lesions in nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic patients.血管造影和血管内超声特征对非糖尿病和2型糖尿病患者初发病变西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术后临床结局的影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2010 May;21(3):175-81. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32833811fe.
5
[Influencing factors of exercise tolerance in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization in acute phase].[急性心肌梗死患者急性期行经皮冠状动脉介入血管重建术后运动耐量的影响因素]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 1;58(10):763-769. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2019.10.008.
6
Revascularization Trends in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Presenting With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get with the Guidelines (NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG).伴有非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的糖尿病合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建趋势:来自国家心血管数据注册库急性冠状动脉治疗和干预结果网络注册库-遵循指南行动(NCDR ACTION注册库-GWTG)的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 May;9(3):197-205. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002084. Epub 2016 May 10.
7
[Safety and efficacy of second generation drug eluting stents in diabetic and non-diabetic patients].第二代药物洗脱支架在糖尿病和非糖尿病患者中的安全性和有效性
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Nov 20;98(43):3473-3478. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.43.003.
8
The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study: 5-year follow-up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease.Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study:5 年随访:多血管病变糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术血运重建的比较。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Jan;11(1):26-33. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328330ea32.
9
Serial coronary computed tomography angiography-verified coronary plaque progression: comparison of stented patients with or without diabetes.连续冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影证实的冠状动脉斑块进展:支架置入患者伴或不伴糖尿病的比较。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Sep 24;18(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0924-z.
10
Impact of diabetes mellitus on patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesion disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary-artery bypass grafting.糖尿病对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术的无保护左主干冠状动脉病变患者的影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Aug;23(5):322-9. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283564961.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between stress hyperglycemia ratio and progression of non target coronary lesions: a retrospective cohort study.应激性高血糖比值与非靶冠状动脉病变进展的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Jan 22;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01575-7.
2
Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂对心脑血管疾病的影响:一项对照临床试验的荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 23;15:1436217. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1436217. eCollection 2024.
3
Uric acid and evaluate the coronary vascular stenosis gensini score correlation research and in gender differences.
尿酸与冠状动脉血管狭窄程度 Gensini 评分的相关性研究及性别差异。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03581-5.
4
Effect of graded cardiac rehabilitation care on clinical efficacy and quality of life in patients with CHD after OPCAB.分级心脏康复护理对非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后冠心病患者临床疗效及生活质量的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Mar 15;15(3):1820-1830. eCollection 2023.
5
Clinical value and expression of Homer 1, homocysteine, S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine, fibroblast growth factors 23 in coronary heart disease.Homer 1、同型半胱氨酸、S-腺苷-L-同型半胱氨酸、成纤维细胞生长因子23在冠心病中的临床价值及表达
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 May 12;22(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02554-4.