• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[女性对人工流产的情感叙述]

[Women's emotional accounts of induced abortion].

作者信息

Danet Danet Alina

机构信息

Departamento de Organización de Empresas, Marketing y Sociología, Área de Sociología, Universidad de Jaén, Jaén, España.

出版信息

Gac Sanit. 2021 Jul-Aug;35(4):361-373. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 May 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.02.006
PMID:32451189
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore women's emotional accounts of induced abortion, analyzing qualitative scientific publications.

METHOD

Qualitative systematic review of 19 studies published in PubMed, Science Direct and Scopus from 2010 onwards. The articles based on qualitative research design were revised using inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis identified three main themes regarding women's emotional experiences: access to abortion, emotional impact during medical assistance, and individual, relational and sociocultural determinants. The studies showed the variability in women's emotional accounts, mainly determined by the following factors: Access and waiting times, health system, type of intervention, degree of awareness and participation regarding the use of technical and medical technologies, interaction with health professionals, and specificity of individual, relational and sociocultural context. The main emotional difficulties were related to the ethical conflict, the decision-making, the relation with the social and health system and stigma. As main facilitating aspects, women highlighted autonomy in decision-making and emotional support, while barriers referred to social rejection and negative messages perceived from the political, social and health system.

CONCLUSIONS

The emotional accounts around induced abortion depend on individual and relational factors, as well as on health assistance, all mediated by gender inequalities and bias. Improvements in health assistance refer to an integral and individualized attention, adapted to women's needs.

摘要

目的

通过分析定性科学出版物,探究女性对人工流产的情感描述。

方法

对2010年起发表于PubMed、Science Direct和Scopus的19项研究进行定性系统综述。采用归纳性内容分析法对基于定性研究设计的文章进行修订。

结果

分析确定了关于女性情感经历的三个主要主题:人工流产的可及性、医疗救助期间的情感影响以及个人、人际关系和社会文化决定因素。研究表明,女性情感描述存在差异,主要由以下因素决定:可及性和等待时间、卫生系统、干预类型、对技术和医疗技术使用的认知和参与程度、与医护人员的互动以及个人、人际关系和社会文化背景的特殊性。主要情感困境与伦理冲突、决策、与社会和卫生系统的关系以及污名化有关。作为主要促进因素,女性强调决策自主权和情感支持,而障碍则指社会排斥以及从政治、社会和卫生系统感受到的负面信息。

结论

围绕人工流产的情感描述取决于个人和人际关系因素以及卫生救助,所有这些都受到性别不平等和偏见的影响。卫生救助的改善意味着提供全面且个性化的关注,以满足女性的需求。

相似文献

1
[Women's emotional accounts of induced abortion].[女性对人工流产的情感叙述]
Gac Sanit. 2021 Jul-Aug;35(4):361-373. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 May 22.
2
Social sources of women's emotional difficulty after abortion: lessons from women's abortion narratives.女性堕胎后情绪困境的社会根源:来自女性堕胎叙述的教训。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Jun;43(2):103-9. doi: 10.1363/4310311. Epub 2011 May 17.
3
Scandinavian women's experiences with abortions on request: a systematic review.斯堪的纳维亚女性按需堕胎的经历:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 Jul;16(7):1537-1563. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003344.
4
Decision-making preceding induced abortion: a qualitative study of women's experiences in Kisumu, Kenya.人工流产前的决策:肯尼亚基苏木妇女经验的定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2018 Oct 3;15(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0612-6.
5
Exploring stigma and social norms in women's abortion experiences and their expectations of care.探讨女性堕胎经历中的污名和社会规范,以及她们对护理的期望。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 Nov;27(3):1661753. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2019.1661753.
6
Women's Pathways to Abortion Care in South Carolina: A Qualitative Study of Obstacles and Supports.南卡罗来纳州女性获取堕胎护理的途径:对障碍与支持因素的定性研究
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Dec;48(4):199-207. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12006. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
7
Abortion needs expressed on Reddit after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision in the United States.美国多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案(Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision)后,Reddit 上出现了堕胎需求。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Mar;56(1):41-49. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12252. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
8
Stigma, abortion, and disclosure--findings from a qualitative study.污名化、堕胎和披露——一项定性研究的结果。
J Sex Med. 2012 Dec;9(12):3137-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02604.x. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
9
Abortion Stigma Among Low-Income Women Obtaining Abortions in Western Pennsylvania: A Qualitative Assessment.宾夕法尼亚州西部低收入堕胎女性中的堕胎污名化:一项定性评估
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Mar;49(1):29-36. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12014. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
10
[Abortion in Melilla: barriers to ocean and frontier].[梅利利亚的堕胎:海洋与边境的障碍]
Gac Sanit. 2024 Feb 2;38:102355. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2024.102355. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
[Subjective implications for adult women who underwent an abortion in Argentina following the enactment of Law 27610].[阿根廷第27610号法律颁布后接受堕胎手术的成年女性的主观影响]
Salud Colect. 2025 May 13;21:e5349. doi: 10.18294/sc.2025.5349.
2
Ethical Challenges in Abortion Decision-Making: Perspectives from Perimenopausal Women's Nursing Care.堕胎决策中的伦理挑战:围绝经期妇女护理视角
Invest Educ Enferm. 2025 Apr;43(1). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v43n1e01.
3
How can patient experience of abortion care be improved? Evidence from the SACHA study.
如何改善堕胎护理的患者体验?来自 SACHA 研究的证据。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241242675. doi: 10.1177/17455057241242675.
4
[Prevention of mental health disorders in primary care: Pregnancy in adolescence].[初级保健中精神健康障碍的预防:青少年怀孕]
Aten Primaria. 2022 Oct;54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):102494. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2022.102494.
5
Factors related to the voluntary interruption of pregnancy in Spain.西班牙人工流产自愿终止相关因素。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2022 Apr 26;63(1):E69-E75. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.1.2299. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
[Gaceta Sanitaria in 2021. Protecting the planet to protect health].[《2021年西班牙公共卫生杂志》。保护地球以保障健康]
Gac Sanit. 2022 Mar-Apr;36(2):101-105. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.02.002.