Laser Research Center of Dentistry, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Restorative Department, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Int Orthod. 2020 Sep;18(3):528-537. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 May 22.
Bracket bonding to composite surfaces is increasing. This study sought to assess the effect of different adhesives (acid etchant+Transbond XT™, acid etchant+Vertise Flow™, Vertise Flow™) with different surface treatments (no preparation, bur, sandblasting, Er:YAG laser) on shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets to aged composite.
In this in vitro, experimental study, Filtek™ Z250 composite discs were fabricated (10×4mm). After thermocycling (10,000 cycles between 5-55°C), the samples were randomly divided into three groups (n=48) based on the type of adhesive namely acid etchant+Transbond XT™, Vertise Flow™, and acid etchant+Vertise Flow™. Samples in each group were randomly divided into four subgroups (n=12) based on the surface treatment including no-treatment, diamond bur, sandblasting and Er:YAG laser. Samples in each group were randomly divided into three subgroups (n=12) based on the type of adhesive namely acid etchant+Transbond XT™, Vertise Flow™, and acid etchant+Vertise Flow™. After bracket bonding to composite discs, the samples underwent thermocycling (5000 cycles between 5-55°C), and their SBS was measured in a universal testing machine. The samples were then inspected under a stereomicroscope at x10 magnification to determine their mode of failure and adhesive remnant index (ARI).
No significant difference was noted in SBS between adhesives in no-preparation and laser groups (P>0.05). In all adhesive groups, sandblast had highest SBS, but it was not significantly different in Vertise Flow™ groups, with and without etching. The SBS provided by acid etchant+Transbond XT™ was significantly higher than that of the other two adhesives (P<0.05). The SBS of sandblasted samples was significantly higher compared with other surface treatments in all adhesive subgroups (P<0.05).
Bracket bonding to aged composite using Vertise Flow™ with or without surface treatment can serve as an alternative to the conventional orthodontic adhesives.
复合树脂表面的托槽粘接越来越多。本研究旨在评估不同的粘接剂(酸蚀剂+Transbond XT™、酸蚀剂+Vertise Flow™、Vertise Flow™)与不同的表面处理(无处理、金钢砂车针、喷砂、Er:YAG 激光)对金属托槽与老化复合树脂的剪切粘接强度(SBS)的影响。
在这项体外实验研究中,制作了 Filtek™ Z250 复合树脂片(10×4mm)。热循环(5-55°C 之间 10000 次循环)后,根据粘接剂的类型(酸蚀剂+Transbond XT™、Vertise Flow™、酸蚀剂+Vertise Flow™)将样本随机分为三组(每组 n=48)。每组根据表面处理方式(无处理、金钢砂车针、喷砂、Er:YAG 激光)再随机分为四组(每组 n=12)。每组再根据粘接剂的类型(酸蚀剂+Transbond XT™、Vertise Flow™、酸蚀剂+Vertise Flow™)随机分为三组(每组 n=12)。将托槽粘接在复合树脂片上后,样本进行热循环(5-55°C 之间 5000 次循环),并在万能试验机上测量其 SBS。然后在立体显微镜下以 10 倍放大倍数观察样本,以确定其失效模式和粘接残留指数(ARI)。
在无处理组和激光组中,不同粘接剂之间的 SBS 无显著差异(P>0.05)。在所有粘接剂组中,喷砂处理的 SBS 最高,但在没有酸蚀的情况下,Vertise Flow™ 各组之间没有显著差异。酸蚀剂+Transbond XT™ 的 SBS 明显高于其他两种粘接剂(P<0.05)。喷砂处理样本的 SBS 明显高于所有粘接剂亚组的其他表面处理(P<0.05)。
在老化的复合树脂上使用带有或不带有表面处理的 Vertise Flow™ 粘接金属托槽可以作为传统正畸粘接剂的替代方法。