Sayed Mohammed E
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Polymers (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;17(5):621. doi: 10.3390/polym17050621.
Patient demands for aesthetic orthodontic brackets (OBs) has increased since orthodontic treatments are of long duration. Clinicians encounter old composite restorations frequently, against which OBs need to be bonded. This study aims to determine the shear bond strength (SBS) of two aesthetic OBs (ceramic and resin) against aged composite resins (flowable and packable) after standard surface treatment. A total of 96 disk-shaped specimens of two aged (A) composite resins [flowable (F) and packable (P)] were divided into eight groups, using ceramic (C) and plastic (P) brackets, out of which four subgroups served as the control [non-aged (N)FC, NPC, NFR, NPR] and four as experimental [AFC, APC, AFR, APR]. Surface treatment included mechanical [air abrasion] and chemical [Assure Plus and Transbond XT]. After 24 h of storage, the specimens were tested for SBS and observed for failure mode using adhesive remnant index scores. Mean values of SBS in each subgroup were analyzed statistically using a one-way analysis of variance test and Tukey post hoc test. All probability '' differences were significant at a value of 0.05 and less. All aged composite resin subgroups had decreased bond strength than controls, with all subgroups bonded with plastic brackets having the least bond strengths that were clinically nonacceptable [≤7 to 10 MPa]. Flowable composites when bonded with either ceramic or plastic brackets had higher strength than packable composites. Ceramic brackets had higher SBS than plastic brackets for both flowable and packable composites. Significant differences in bond strength were observed among subgroups of plastic brackets. Ceramic brackets were associated with a higher residue of adhesives on the composite surface. Aged composite resins exhibit significantly lower SBS than fresh composites, with ceramic brackets and flowable composites producing better bond strength values than plastic brackets and packable composites.
由于正畸治疗疗程较长,患者对美观正畸托槽(OBs)的需求有所增加。临床医生经常会遇到旧的复合树脂修复体,需要将OBs粘结在上面。本研究旨在确定两种美观OBs(陶瓷和树脂)在标准表面处理后与老化复合树脂(可流动和可填充)之间的剪切粘结强度(SBS)。将两种老化(A)复合树脂[可流动(F)和可填充(P)]的96个圆盘形试件分为八组,使用陶瓷(C)和塑料(P)托槽,其中四个亚组作为对照组[未老化(N)FC、NPC、NFR、NPR],四个作为实验组[AFC、APC、AFR、APR]。表面处理包括机械处理[空气喷砂]和化学处理[Assure Plus和Transbond XT]。储存24小时后,对试件进行SBS测试,并使用粘结剂残留指数评分观察失效模式。各亚组SBS的平均值采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验进行统计学分析。所有概率“差异”在0.05及以下的值时具有显著性。所有老化复合树脂亚组的粘结强度均低于对照组,所有用塑料托槽粘结的亚组粘结强度最低,在临床上是不可接受的[≤7至10MPa]。可流动复合材料与陶瓷或塑料托槽粘结时的强度高于可填充复合材料。对于可流动和可填充复合材料,陶瓷托槽的SBS均高于塑料托槽。在塑料托槽亚组之间观察到粘结强度有显著差异。陶瓷托槽与复合材料表面较高的粘结剂残留有关。老化复合树脂的SBS明显低于新鲜复合材料,陶瓷托槽和可流动复合材料产生的粘结强度值优于塑料托槽和可填充复合材料。