Cabinet d'Ophtalmologie du Congrès, Nice, France.
Clinique Saint George, Nice, France.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;31(4):1809-1816. doi: 10.1177/1120672120925766. Epub 2020 May 26.
This study compared real-world safety and efficacy outcomes of cataract surgery performed with LenSx femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery or manual phacoemulsification cataract surgery procedures.
A retrospective observational study used data from anonymised electronic medical records to compare mean cumulative dissipated energy, the proportion of eyes reaching emmetropia, mean change in best-corrected distance visual acuity and the proportion of eyes with post-surgical complications, including corneal oedema and posterior capsule opacification. Results were adjusted for multiple comparisons for primary and secondary objectives.
Data from 811 phacoemulsification cataract surgery and 496 femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery procedures were analysed. Mean cumulative dissipated energy was significantly lower for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (6.5 percent-seconds) than for phacoemulsification cataract surgery (14.3 percent-seconds; < 0.0001) procedures. More femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (81.2%) procedures achieved emmetropia (⩽ 0.5 dioptre) than did phacoemulsification cataract surgery (73.5%) procedures, although this difference was not statistically significant. Mean change in best-corrected distance visual acuity and the proportion of eyes with corneal oedema, posterior capsule opacification or other complications were not significantly different between cohorts when adjusted for multiple comparisons.
In this single-centre, single-surgeon retrospective electronic medical record database study using divide and conquer technique, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery was associated with significantly lower cumulative dissipated energy when compared to manual phacoemulsification cataract surgery. This supports the hypothesis that femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery involves less mechanical trauma, which might lead to more consistent refractive and safety outcomes than manual phacoemulsification cataract surgery, though such outcomes were found to be comparable in this study.
本研究比较了 LenSx 飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与手动超声乳化白内障手术的真实世界安全性和疗效结果。
采用回顾性观察性研究,使用匿名电子病历数据比较平均累积消散能量、达到正视眼的眼比例、最佳矫正远视力的平均变化以及术后并发症(包括角膜水肿和后囊混浊)的眼比例。结果针对主要和次要目标进行了多次比较调整。
分析了 811 例超声乳化白内障手术和 496 例飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的数据。飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的平均累积消散能量明显低于超声乳化白内障手术(6.5%秒)( < 0.0001)。更多的飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(81.2%)达到正视眼( ⩽ 0.5 屈光度),而超声乳化白内障手术为 73.5%(尽管这一差异无统计学意义)。当调整多次比较时,最佳矫正远视力的平均变化以及角膜水肿、后囊混浊或其他并发症的眼比例在两组之间没有显著差异。
在这项使用分割和征服技术的单中心、单外科医生回顾性电子病历数据库研究中,与手动超声乳化白内障手术相比,飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的累积消散能量明显降低。这支持了飞秒激光辅助白内障手术涉及的机械创伤较少的假设,这可能导致比手动超声乳化白内障手术更一致的屈光和安全性结果,尽管在这项研究中发现这些结果是可比的。