• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性尺侧副韧带撕裂的生物力学功能肘修复:内支撑在间隙形成和修复稳定中的作用。

Biomechanical Functional Elbow Restoration of Acute Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: The Role of Internal Bracing on Gap Formation and Repair Stabilization.

机构信息

Arthrex Department of Orthopedic Research, Munich, Germany.

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(8):1884-1892. doi: 10.1177/0363546520921174. Epub 2020 May 26.

DOI:10.1177/0363546520921174
PMID:32453667
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical studies have compared augmented primary repair with internal bracing versus reconstruction techniques of the anterior ulnar collateral ligament (aUCL) in the elbow. However, aUCL repair alone has not been compared with augmented repair or reconstruction techniques.

HYPOTHESIS

Internal bracing of aUCL repair provides improved time-zero stabilization in terms of gap formation, torsional stiffness, and residual torque compared with both repair alone and the modified docking technique, with enhanced valgus stability restoration to that of the native ligament.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

We randomized 8 matched pairs of cadaveric elbows to undergo either augmented aUCL repair or a modified docking technique through use of the palmaris longus tendon. Valgus laxity testing was consecutively performed at 90° of flexion on the intact, torn, and repaired conditions as well as the previously assigned techniques. First, intact elbows were loaded up to 10 N·m valgus torque to evaluate time-zero ligament rotations at valgus moments of 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10 N·m. Rotation controlled cycling was performed (total 1000 cycles) for each surgical condition. Gap formation, stiffness, and residual torque were analyzed. Finally, these elbows and 8 additional intact elbows underwent torque to failure testing (30 deg/min).

RESULTS

Repair alone revealed low torsional resistance and gapping, similar to the torn state. The augmented repair technique showed significantly higher torsional stiffness ( < .001) and residual torque ( < .001) compared with all other conditions and restored native function. Although reconstruction revealed similar initial stiffness and residual torque compared with an intact ligament, a steady decrease of torsional resistance led to a completely loose state at higher valgus rotations. Analysis of covariance between all groups showed significantly less gap formation for augmented repair ( < .001). The native failure load and stiffness were significantly higher and were similar to those of augmented repair ( = .766).

CONCLUSION

Internal bracing of aUCL repair restored valgus stability to the native state with statistically improved torsional resistance, loading capability, and gap formation compared with reconstruction, especially at the upper load range of native aUCL function in the elbow.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We found that aUCL repair with an internal brace effectively improves time-zero mechanical characteristics and may provide stabilized healing with accelerated and reliable recovery without the need for a tendon graft.

摘要

背景

生物力学研究比较了增强初次修复与内部支撑治疗与肘前尺侧副韧带(aUCL)重建技术。然而,单独的 aUCL 修复尚未与增强修复或重建技术进行比较。

假设

与单独修复和改良对接技术相比,aUCL 修复的内部支撑在间隙形成、扭转刚度和残余扭矩方面提供了更好的即刻稳定性,并且能够恢复到与正常韧带相当的外翻稳定性。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

我们随机将 8 对匹配的尸体肘部分为增强型 aUCL 修复组或改良对接技术组(使用掌长肌腱)。在 90° 弯曲状态下,连续对完整、撕裂和修复状态以及之前分配的技术进行外翻松弛测试。首先,在 2.5、5.0、7.5 和 10 N·m 的外翻扭矩下加载完整的肘部,以评估在 10 N·m 时的即刻韧带旋转。对每种手术条件进行旋转控制循环(总共 1000 个循环)。分析间隙形成、刚度和残余扭矩。最后,这些肘部和另外 8 个完整的肘部进行了失效扭矩测试(30°/min)。

结果

单独修复显示出低扭转阻力和间隙形成,类似于撕裂状态。增强修复技术显示出明显更高的扭转刚度(<.001)和残余扭矩(<.001)与所有其他条件相比,恢复了正常功能。尽管重建与正常韧带相比具有相似的初始刚度和残余扭矩,但随着扭转阻力的逐渐下降,在较高的外翻旋转时,韧带会完全松弛。对所有组的协方差分析显示,增强修复的间隙形成明显减少(<.001)。正常的失效载荷和刚度明显较高,与增强修复相似(=.766)。

结论

与重建相比,aUCL 修复的内部支撑恢复了外翻稳定性到正常状态,扭转阻力、加载能力和间隙形成的统计学改善,特别是在肘部正常 aUCL 功能的上负荷范围。

临床相关性

我们发现,带内部支撑的 aUCL 修复有效改善了即刻力学特性,并可提供稳定的愈合,加速和可靠的恢复,而无需肌腱移植物。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical Functional Elbow Restoration of Acute Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: The Role of Internal Bracing on Gap Formation and Repair Stabilization.急性尺侧副韧带撕裂的生物力学功能肘修复:内支撑在间隙形成和修复稳定中的作用。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(8):1884-1892. doi: 10.1177/0363546520921174. Epub 2020 May 26.
2
Biomechanical Stability of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Repair of the Elbow: The Role of Ligament Bracing on Gap Formation and Stabilization.肘部外侧尺侧副韧带重建和修复的生物力学稳定性:韧带支撑在间隙形成和稳定中的作用。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Apr;51(5):1303-1311. doi: 10.1177/03635465231157735. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
3
Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With the Docking Technique Versus Repair With Internal Bracing.尺侧副韧带重建的生物力学比较:采用对接技术与内部支撑修复。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3495-3501. doi: 10.1177/0363546518803771. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
4
Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Bracing Versus Modified Jobe Reconstruction.尺侧副韧带修复联合内支撑与改良乔布重建的生物力学比较
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):735-41. doi: 10.1177/0363546515620390. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
5
Dual Bracing for Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries Restores Native Valgus Laxity and Native Medial Joint Gapping of the Elbow.尺侧副韧带损伤的双重支撑可恢复肘关节的自然外翻松弛度和自然内侧关节间隙。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jun 22;11(6):23259671231179179. doi: 10.1177/23259671231179179. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Biomechanical evaluation of the TightRope versus traditional docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique: kinematic and failure testing.经皮桡骨茎突入路与传统 Dock 入路尺侧副韧带重建技术的生物力学比较:运动学和失效测试。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 May;41(5):1165-73. doi: 10.1177/0363546513482567.
7
Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With a Modified Docking Technique With and Without Suture Augmentation.尺侧副韧带重建的生物力学比较:改良的对接技术与带和不带缝线增强的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(4):928-932. doi: 10.1177/0363546518820304. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
LUCL internal bracing restores posterolateral rotatory stability of the elbow.LUCL 内置支撑可恢复肘部后外侧旋转稳定性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr;28(4):1195-1201. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05632-x. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
9
Suture tape augmentation of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament increases load to failure in simulated posterolateral rotatory instability.缝线锚钉增强外侧尺副韧带增加了模拟后外侧旋转不稳定的失效负荷。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jan;29(1):284-291. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05918-5. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
10
Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using bisuspensory fixation: a biomechanical comparison with the docking technique.采用双悬吊固定法进行尺侧副韧带重建:与 docking 技术的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 May;41(5):1158-64. doi: 10.1177/0363546513481957. Epub 2013 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the efficacy of hinged elbow braces in reducing passive valgus forces after ulnar collateral ligament injury-A biomechanical study.评估铰链式肘部支具在尺侧副韧带损伤后减少被动外翻力方面的疗效——一项生物力学研究。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jan 3;12(1):e70094. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70094. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
A systematic review of surgical outcomes of ulnar collateral ligament rupture in the elbow treated with various techniques.对采用各种技术治疗的肘部尺侧副韧带断裂手术效果的系统评价。
J Orthop. 2024 Nov 14;64:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.11.007. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture Augmentation Results in Good Clinical Results, a Return-to-Play Rate Between 67% and 93%, and a Postoperative Complication Rate Up to 11.9%: A Systematic Review.
采用缝线增强技术修复肘部尺侧副韧带可取得良好的临床效果,重返比赛率在67%至93%之间,术后并发症发生率高达11.9%:一项系统评价。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Jul 29;5(5):100761. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100761. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Comparing Static Stability of Native Elbow With Static Stability of Novel Bidirectional Ligament Reconstruction at Different Degrees of Elbow Flexion.比较不同肘关节屈曲角度下,天然肘关节的静态稳定性与新型双向韧带重建的静态稳定性。
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Mar 8;5(3):318-324. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.02.003. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Preclinical Studies.带增强术的内侧尺侧副韧带修复:临床前研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 May 2;11(5):23259671231158373. doi: 10.1177/23259671231158373. eCollection 2023 May.
6
[Terrible triad injuries].[可怕三联征损伤]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Sep;126(9):679-686. doi: 10.1007/s00113-023-01321-0. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Clinical Research Progress of Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation Technique in Knee Ligament Injury Repair and Reconstruction: A Narrative Review.内支撑韧带增强技术在膝关节韧带损伤修复与重建中的临床研究进展:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 2;12(5):1999. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051999.
8
[Augmented primary sutures "internal bracing" following ligamentous elbow dislocation].[肘关节韧带脱位后增强一期缝合“内部支撑”]
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Feb;35(1):43-55. doi: 10.1007/s00064-022-00788-1. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
9
Intersurgeon Consistency of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Brace: A Biomechanical Analysis.使用内部支撑进行尺侧副韧带修复的外科医生间一致性:一项生物力学分析。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Nov 14;10(11):23259671221134829. doi: 10.1177/23259671221134829. eCollection 2022 Nov.
10
Utilization of Internal Bracing in Elbow Medial UCL Stabilization: From Biomechanics to Clinical Application and Patient Outcomes.内侧副韧带(UCL)稳定术中使用内支撑:从生物力学到临床应用及患者预后
Orthop Res Rev. 2021 Oct 19;13:201-208. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S321890. eCollection 2021.