Arthrex Department of Orthopedic Research, Munich, Germany.
Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(8):1884-1892. doi: 10.1177/0363546520921174. Epub 2020 May 26.
Biomechanical studies have compared augmented primary repair with internal bracing versus reconstruction techniques of the anterior ulnar collateral ligament (aUCL) in the elbow. However, aUCL repair alone has not been compared with augmented repair or reconstruction techniques.
Internal bracing of aUCL repair provides improved time-zero stabilization in terms of gap formation, torsional stiffness, and residual torque compared with both repair alone and the modified docking technique, with enhanced valgus stability restoration to that of the native ligament.
Controlled laboratory study.
We randomized 8 matched pairs of cadaveric elbows to undergo either augmented aUCL repair or a modified docking technique through use of the palmaris longus tendon. Valgus laxity testing was consecutively performed at 90° of flexion on the intact, torn, and repaired conditions as well as the previously assigned techniques. First, intact elbows were loaded up to 10 N·m valgus torque to evaluate time-zero ligament rotations at valgus moments of 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10 N·m. Rotation controlled cycling was performed (total 1000 cycles) for each surgical condition. Gap formation, stiffness, and residual torque were analyzed. Finally, these elbows and 8 additional intact elbows underwent torque to failure testing (30 deg/min).
Repair alone revealed low torsional resistance and gapping, similar to the torn state. The augmented repair technique showed significantly higher torsional stiffness ( < .001) and residual torque ( < .001) compared with all other conditions and restored native function. Although reconstruction revealed similar initial stiffness and residual torque compared with an intact ligament, a steady decrease of torsional resistance led to a completely loose state at higher valgus rotations. Analysis of covariance between all groups showed significantly less gap formation for augmented repair ( < .001). The native failure load and stiffness were significantly higher and were similar to those of augmented repair ( = .766).
Internal bracing of aUCL repair restored valgus stability to the native state with statistically improved torsional resistance, loading capability, and gap formation compared with reconstruction, especially at the upper load range of native aUCL function in the elbow.
We found that aUCL repair with an internal brace effectively improves time-zero mechanical characteristics and may provide stabilized healing with accelerated and reliable recovery without the need for a tendon graft.
生物力学研究比较了增强初次修复与内部支撑治疗与肘前尺侧副韧带(aUCL)重建技术。然而,单独的 aUCL 修复尚未与增强修复或重建技术进行比较。
与单独修复和改良对接技术相比,aUCL 修复的内部支撑在间隙形成、扭转刚度和残余扭矩方面提供了更好的即刻稳定性,并且能够恢复到与正常韧带相当的外翻稳定性。
对照实验室研究。
我们随机将 8 对匹配的尸体肘部分为增强型 aUCL 修复组或改良对接技术组(使用掌长肌腱)。在 90° 弯曲状态下,连续对完整、撕裂和修复状态以及之前分配的技术进行外翻松弛测试。首先,在 2.5、5.0、7.5 和 10 N·m 的外翻扭矩下加载完整的肘部,以评估在 10 N·m 时的即刻韧带旋转。对每种手术条件进行旋转控制循环(总共 1000 个循环)。分析间隙形成、刚度和残余扭矩。最后,这些肘部和另外 8 个完整的肘部进行了失效扭矩测试(30°/min)。
单独修复显示出低扭转阻力和间隙形成,类似于撕裂状态。增强修复技术显示出明显更高的扭转刚度(<.001)和残余扭矩(<.001)与所有其他条件相比,恢复了正常功能。尽管重建与正常韧带相比具有相似的初始刚度和残余扭矩,但随着扭转阻力的逐渐下降,在较高的外翻旋转时,韧带会完全松弛。对所有组的协方差分析显示,增强修复的间隙形成明显减少(<.001)。正常的失效载荷和刚度明显较高,与增强修复相似(=.766)。
与重建相比,aUCL 修复的内部支撑恢复了外翻稳定性到正常状态,扭转阻力、加载能力和间隙形成的统计学改善,特别是在肘部正常 aUCL 功能的上负荷范围。
我们发现,带内部支撑的 aUCL 修复有效改善了即刻力学特性,并可提供稳定的愈合,加速和可靠的恢复,而无需肌腱移植物。