• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尺侧副韧带重建的生物力学比较:改良的对接技术与带和不带缝线增强的比较。

Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With a Modified Docking Technique With and Without Suture Augmentation.

机构信息

The Taylor Collaboration, San Francisco, California, USA.

Medical Device Development, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(4):928-932. doi: 10.1177/0363546518820304. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1177/0363546518820304
PMID:30689955
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Throwing athletes with ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury and symptomatic valgus instability can expect to return to the same or higher level of play. Reconstruction with tendon graft is the dominant method of surgical treatment. Recent evidence suggests that spanning the joint with a suture anchored on both sides is biomechanically equivalent to reconstruction, with faster time to return to play. The authors developed a hybrid UCL reconstruction technique augmented with a suture brace to improve joint stability.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to biomechanically evaluate a hybrid reconstruction technique and compare its performance to reconstruction without augmentation. The authors hypothesized that (1) both groups would lose stability after the simulated tear and regain stability with treatment, (2) the suture augmentation would improve stability, and (3) the addition of the suture anchors near the bone tunnels would not decrease the strength of the hybrid reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten matched pairs of cadaveric arms were dissected to expose the UCL. Each elbow was mounted on a test frame at 90° of flexion. A cyclic valgus rotational torque was applied to the humerus with the UCL in its intact state and repeated in its surgically torn state. Finally, each specimen received either a hybrid reconstruction with suture brace or a reconstruction and was again put through the cyclic protocol, followed by a valgus rotation load-to-fail protocol.

RESULTS

Gap formation in the torn state for the reconstruction and hybrid reconstruction groups (0.9 ± 0.1 mm and 0.8 ± 0.1 mm, respectively) was significantly higher ( P = .009 and P = .0002) than in the intact state (0.6 ± 0.2 mm and 0.6 ± 0.3 mm, respectively). After the procedures, the hybrid group showed greater resistance to gapping ( P = .017) as compared with the reconstruction group (0.4 ± 0.2 mm and 0.6 ± 0.1 mm). During load to failure, no hybrid reconstructions failed from bone fracture or screw pullout. No statistical differences were found for failure torque ( P = .058) and stiffness ( P = .101). Gap at 10 N·m was significantly lower ( P = .014) for the hybrid reconstruction group than for the reconstruction group.

CONCLUSION

The current study showed that hybrid reconstruction with suture bracing replicated the time-zero strength of traditional UCL reconstruction and may be more resistant to joint gapping during low cyclic load and load to failure. The combination of the bone tunnels and fixation screw holes did not appear to weaken the construct.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study demonstrated that reconstruction with suture bracing has important time-zero stability and strength as compared with the gold standard of UCL reconstruction. This technique may be useful for throwing athletes who need UCL reconstruction.

摘要

背景

患有 UCL 损伤和有症状的外翻不稳定的投掷运动员有望恢复到相同或更高的运动水平。使用肌腱移植物重建是手术治疗的主要方法。最近的证据表明,用两侧固定的缝线跨越关节在生物力学上等同于重建,并且恢复运动的时间更快。作者开发了一种混合 UCL 重建技术,并用缝线支撑物进行增强,以提高关节稳定性。

目的/假设:本研究的目的是对混合重建技术进行生物力学评估,并将其性能与无增强重建进行比较。作者假设:(1)两组在模拟撕裂后都会失去稳定性,但经过治疗后会恢复稳定性;(2)缝线增强会提高稳定性;(3)在骨隧道附近添加缝线锚定不会降低混合重建的强度。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

对 10 对匹配的尸体手臂进行解剖以暴露 UCL。每个肘部都在 90°弯曲的测试框架上进行安装。在 UCL 处于完整状态和手术撕裂状态下,对肱骨施加周期性外翻旋转扭矩。最后,每个标本都接受了混合重建加缝线支撑或重建,并再次通过循环协议进行处理,然后进行外翻旋转失效负载协议。

结果

撕裂状态下重建组和混合重建组的间隙形成(分别为 0.9 ± 0.1 mm 和 0.8 ± 0.1 mm)明显高于完整状态下的间隙形成(分别为 0.6 ± 0.2 mm 和 0.6 ± 0.3 mm)(P =.009 和 P =.0002)。在手术后,混合组比重建组更能抵抗间隙形成(P =.017)(分别为 0.4 ± 0.2 mm 和 0.6 ± 0.1 mm)。在失效负载下,没有混合重建因骨骨折或螺钉拔出而失效。失效扭矩(P =.058)和刚度(P =.101)没有统计学差异。混合重建组的 10 N·m 时的间隙明显低于重建组(P =.014)。

结论

目前的研究表明,带缝线支撑的混合重建复制了传统 UCL 重建的初始强度,并且在低循环负载和失效负载下可能更能抵抗关节间隙。骨隧道和固定螺钉孔的组合似乎没有削弱构建体。

临床相关性

本研究表明,与 UCL 重建的金标准相比,带缝线支撑的重建具有重要的初始稳定性和强度。这种技术可能对需要 UCL 重建的投掷运动员有用。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With a Modified Docking Technique With and Without Suture Augmentation.尺侧副韧带重建的生物力学比较:改良的对接技术与带和不带缝线增强的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(4):928-932. doi: 10.1177/0363546518820304. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
2
Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Bracing Versus Modified Jobe Reconstruction.尺侧副韧带修复联合内支撑与改良乔布重建的生物力学比较
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):735-41. doi: 10.1177/0363546515620390. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
3
Biomechanical assessment of docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction after failed ulnar collateral ligament repair with suture augmentation.修复失败后的桡尺侧副韧带修复术伴缝合增强的桡尺侧副韧带再固定的生物力学评估。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jul;30(7):1477-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.034. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
4
Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With the Docking Technique Versus Repair With Internal Bracing.尺侧副韧带重建的生物力学比较:采用对接技术与内部支撑修复。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3495-3501. doi: 10.1177/0363546518803771. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
5
Biomechanical comparison of docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction with and without an internal brace.尺侧副韧带重建与不带内支撑的生物力学比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Nov;28(11):2247-2252. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.061. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
6
Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Suture Augmentation.尺侧副韧带重建中缝合增强与非缝合增强的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jul;50(9):2508-2514. doi: 10.1177/03635465221101421. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
7
Biomechanical Stability of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Repair of the Elbow: The Role of Ligament Bracing on Gap Formation and Stabilization.肘部外侧尺侧副韧带重建和修复的生物力学稳定性:韧带支撑在间隙形成和稳定中的作用。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Apr;51(5):1303-1311. doi: 10.1177/03635465231157735. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
8
Biomechanical Functional Elbow Restoration of Acute Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: The Role of Internal Bracing on Gap Formation and Repair Stabilization.急性尺侧副韧带撕裂的生物力学功能肘修复:内支撑在间隙形成和修复稳定中的作用。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(8):1884-1892. doi: 10.1177/0363546520921174. Epub 2020 May 26.
9
Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Restoration of the Ulnar Footprint vs Traditional Ulnar Tunnels in Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.解剖修复尺侧附韧带重建中尺侧足迹与传统尺侧隧道的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Apr;50(5):1375-1381. doi: 10.1177/03635465211054475. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
10
Suture tape augmentation of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament increases load to failure in simulated posterolateral rotatory instability.缝线锚钉增强外侧尺副韧带增加了模拟后外侧旋转不稳定的失效负荷。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jan;29(1):284-291. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05918-5. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology of Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgeries in Major and Minor League Baseball Pitchers: A Descriptive Study of 2281 Cases.美国职业棒球大联盟和小联盟投手肘内侧尺侧副韧带手术的流行病学:一项对2281例病例的描述性研究。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jul 7;13(7):23259671251352199. doi: 10.1177/23259671251352199. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Biomechanical Comparison of Stability and Strength After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Anchor Fixation Versus Bone Tunnels.尺侧副韧带重建中使用缝线锚钉固定与骨隧道固定后的稳定性和强度的生物力学比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Sep 8;11(9):23259671231196135. doi: 10.1177/23259671231196135. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Dual Bracing for Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries Restores Native Valgus Laxity and Native Medial Joint Gapping of the Elbow.
尺侧副韧带损伤的双重支撑可恢复肘关节的自然外翻松弛度和自然内侧关节间隙。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jun 22;11(6):23259671231179179. doi: 10.1177/23259671231179179. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Similar Biomechanics Between the Double-Cortical Button and Docking Techniques for Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Evaluation.尺侧副韧带重建中双皮质纽扣技术与对接技术的相似生物力学:尸体评估
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jan 27;11(1):23259671221123342. doi: 10.1177/23259671221123342. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Utilization of Internal Bracing in Elbow Medial UCL Stabilization: From Biomechanics to Clinical Application and Patient Outcomes.内侧副韧带(UCL)稳定术中使用内支撑:从生物力学到临床应用及患者预后
Orthop Res Rev. 2021 Oct 19;13:201-208. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S321890. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques in the Elbow of Sports Players.运动选手肘部尺侧副韧带重建技术的比较
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2020 Feb 28;23(1):41-47. doi: 10.5397/cise.2019.00171. eCollection 2020 Mar.