Suppr超能文献

运动试验在囊性纤维化患儿中的应用:系统评价。

Exercise testing for children with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review.

机构信息

School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.

Department of Physiotherapy, Queensland Children's Hospital, Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Services, South Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Aug;55(8):1996-2010. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24794. Epub 2020 May 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Exercise testing is routinely used to measure exercise capacity in children with cystic fibrosis (CF). Various tests are available, however the psychometric properties of these measures have not been systematically reviewed for this population.

METHOD

A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, CINHAL, Cochrane, and PEDro) was performed to identify papers that: (a) reported original psychometric data, (b) examined a measure of exercise capacity, (c) examined children with CF aged eight to 18 years; and (d) were published in English after 1950. The level of psychometric evidence was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.

RESULTS

Searches identified 1025 papers. Forty-six papers were included, covering 15 tests: incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test using a cycle ergometer (CPET(cycle)) or treadmill (CPET(treadmill)), 6 minute walk test (6MWT), modified shuttle test (MST), 3-minute step test (3MST), 2 minute walk test (2MWT), Bratteby walk test, intermittent sprint test, speed ramp test, incremental step test, forward-backwards jump test (FBJT), astride jump test (AJT), motor quotient test, Munich fitness test, and Glittre ADL test.

CONCLUSION

There is a plethora of exercise tests available with varying psychometric robustness. The CPET, 6MWT, and MST have fair to good psychometric properties, but each with their clinical advantages and limitations. Thus, a Selection Guide was developed to assist clinicians and researchers in selecting the most appropriate exercise test for various situations.

摘要

背景

运动测试常用于测量囊性纤维化(CF)患儿的运动能力。有多种测试方法,但尚未系统地审查这些方法在该人群中的心理测量学特性。

方法

系统地搜索电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Medline、CINHAL、Cochrane 和 PEDro),以确定符合以下标准的论文:(a)报告原始心理测量数据,(b)检查运动能力的测量方法,(c)检查 8 至 18 岁的 CF 患儿;(d)以英文发表且发表于 1950 年以后。使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)检查表评估心理测量证据的水平。

结果

搜索共确定了 1025 篇论文。有 46 篇论文符合纳入标准,涵盖了 15 种测试方法:使用自行车测力计(CPET(cycle))或跑步机(CPET(treadmill))的递增心肺运动测试、6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)、改良 shuttle 测试(MST)、3 分钟台阶测试(3MST)、2 分钟步行测试(2MWT)、Bratteby 步行测试、间歇性冲刺测试、速度斜坡测试、递增台阶测试、前后跳跃测试(FBJT)、跨骑跳跃测试(AJT)、运动商数测试、慕尼黑体能测试和 Glittre ADL 测试。

结论

有大量的运动测试可供选择,其心理测量学稳健性也各不相同。CPET、6MWT 和 MST 具有良好的心理测量学特性,但每种方法都有其临床优势和局限性。因此,开发了一个选择指南,以帮助临床医生和研究人员在各种情况下选择最合适的运动测试。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验