Department of Emergency Medicine and Center for Women's Health Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Center, Institute for Clinical Research Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jun;29(6):876-885. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8067. Epub 2020 May 25.
This study was a national scan of education resources on integrating sex and gender considerations into research. The purpose was to assess capacity for educating researchers and to identify gaps, with implications for implementation of guidelines or mandates to consider sex and gender differences in research. Information sources were U.S. training programs in women's health and sex/gender difference research, Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health (BIRCWH), and published peer-reviewed biomedical literature. This descriptive study used multiple methods: a national survey and a comprehensive literature review. BIRCWH leaders responded to a survey regarding education on sex/gender difference research for BIRCWH scholars (response rate 100%, 20 of 20). A comprehensive literature review was conducted for 1993-2018. Nearly half (45%) of BIRCWH institutions offered education on integrating sex or gender differences in clinical translational research; of those, roughly half (54%) offered in-person training and one-third (31%) offered content within existing for-credit courses. Respondents preferred online training (84%) to in-person offerings or reference materials (47% and 42% respectively). Published indexed literature on sex or gender differences has quadrupled since 1993, although growth in these publications remained flat in the most recent six years. Published resources to educate researchers on integrating sex and gender differences into medical research have increased, and BIRCWH programs connect scholars to national resources. Educational gaps remain due to limited access to curricula on applied research approaches, design, and methods for sex/gender difference research. BIRCWH programs desire curricula that are easily accessible online and asynchronously; sanctioned and supported by national thought leaders; linked to required training such as rigor and reproducibility; foster collaboration; and offer practical applications. Evidence-based, high-quality educational curricula and a dissemination plan are needed to enhance the adoption and integration of sex and gender into scientific endeavors.
这项研究是对将性别考虑因素纳入研究的教育资源进行的全国性扫描。目的是评估教育研究人员的能力,并确定差距,这对实施考虑研究中的性别差异的指南或任务具有重要意义。信息来源是美国妇女健康和性别差异研究培训项目、妇女健康跨学科研究职业建设(BIRCWH)以及已发表的同行评议生物医学文献。这项描述性研究使用了多种方法:全国性调查和全面文献综述。BIRCWH 领导人对 BIRCWH 学者的性别差异研究教育情况进行了调查(回应率 100%,20 人中有 20 人)。对 1993 年至 2018 年的文献进行了全面综述。BIRCWH 机构中近一半(45%)提供了关于将性别差异纳入临床转化研究的教育;其中,大约一半(54%)提供了实地培训,三分之一(31%)提供了现有学分课程中的内容。受访者更喜欢在线培训(84%)而不是现场培训或参考资料(分别为 47%和 42%)。自 1993 年以来,关于性别差异的已发表索引文献增加了四倍,但最近六年这些出版物的增长趋于平稳。为了将性别差异纳入医学研究,教育研究人员的资源有所增加,BIRCWH 计划将学者与国家资源联系起来。由于获取有关应用研究方法、设计和性别差异研究方法的课程有限,教育方面仍然存在差距。BIRCWH 计划希望课程能够方便地在线获取且异步进行;得到国家思想领袖的认可和支持;与严格和可重复性等强制性培训相关联;促进合作;并提供实际应用。需要制定循证、高质量的教育课程和传播计划,以增强对科学研究中性别问题的采用和融入。