Suppr超能文献

改善 K12 项目有效性的过程评估:以美国国立卫生研究院妇女健康研究职业发展计划为例。

Process Evaluation for Improving K12 Program Effectiveness: Case Study of a National Institutes of Health Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health Research Career Development Program.

机构信息

1 Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin , Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.

2 Center for Aging Science and Care Innovation, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Jun;27(6):775-781. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6174. Epub 2018 Mar 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Process evaluation is an important tool in quality improvement efforts. This article illustrates how a systematic and continuous evaluation process can be used to improve the quality of faculty career development programs by using the University of Minnesota's Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health (BIRCWH) K12 program as an exemplar.

METHODS

Data from a rigorous process evaluation incorporating quantitative and qualitative measurements were analyzed and reviewed by the BIRCWH program leadership on a regular basis.

RESULTS

Examples are provided of how this evaluation model and processes were used to improve many aspects of the program, thereby improving scholar, mentor, and advisory committee members' satisfaction and scholar outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

A rigorous evaluation plan can increase the effectiveness and impact of a research career development plan.

摘要

简介

过程评估是质量改进工作的重要工具。本文以明尼苏达大学妇女健康跨学科研究职业发展(BIRCWH)K12 项目为例,说明如何通过系统和持续的评估过程来提高教师职业发展项目的质量。

方法

采用定量和定性测量方法对严格的过程评估数据进行了分析,并由 BIRCWH 项目领导层定期进行审查。

结果

提供了如何使用此评估模型和流程来改进该计划的许多方面的示例,从而提高了学者、导师和顾问委员会成员的满意度和学者的成果。

结论

严格的评估计划可以提高研究职业发展计划的有效性和影响力。

相似文献

2
Best practices and pearls in interdisciplinary mentoring from Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health Directors.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Nov;21(11):1114-27. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3788. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
3
Interdisciplinary research career development: building interdisciplinary research careers in women's health program best practices.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Nov;20(11):1587-601. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2011.3165. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
4
Team Mentoring for Interdisciplinary Team Science: Lessons From K12 Scholars and Directors.
Acad Med. 2017 Feb;92(2):214-221. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001330.
7
Contributors to Independent Research Funding Success from the Perspective of K12 BIRCWH Program Directors.
Am J Med Sci. 2020 Nov;360(5):596-603. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Development and implementation of a peer mentoring program for early career gerontological faculty.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015 May;47(3):258-66. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12135. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
3
A formal mentorship program for faculty development.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Jun 17;78(5):100. doi: 10.5688/ajpe785100.
4
A checklist for the development of faculty mentorship programs.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Jun 17;78(5):98. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78598.
5
Impact of a formal mentoring program on academic promotion of Department of Medicine faculty: a comparative study.
Med Teach. 2014 Jul;36(7):608-14. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.899683. Epub 2014 May 7.
6
A mentoring program to help junior faculty members achieve scholarship success.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Mar 12;78(2):29. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78229.
7
Advancing faculty development in medical education: a systematic review.
Acad Med. 2013 Jul;88(7):1038-45. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294fd29.
8
Best practices and pearls in interdisciplinary mentoring from Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health Directors.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Nov;21(11):1114-27. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3788. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
9
A peer mentoring group for junior clinician educators: four years' experience.
Acad Med. 2012 Mar;87(3):378-83. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182441615.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验