Effect of CBCT dose reduction on the mandibular canal visibility: ex vivo comparative study.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the difference in mandibular canal (MC) visibility using three different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition protocols: high resolution (HR), standard resolution (ST) and Quick scan+ (QS+).

METHODS

Twenty-five human dry mandibles were scanned by one CBCT machine; i-CAT FLX (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA, USA), using three different acquisition protocols: high-resolution (HR), standard (ST) and Quick scan+ (QS+). DICOM data were transferred to a third party software Ondemand 3D (Cybermed Co., Seoul, Korea). The fusion module was used to superimpose images derived from different acquisition protocols to standardize the areas to compare the MC visibility. Comparison was performed at nine selected cross sections extending from an area distal to the third molar posteriorly to the first premolar anteriorly. Two expert radiologists evaluated the degree of MC visibility using five-scale scoring system.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference between the three acquisition protocols (HR, ST, QS+) at all investigated areas regardless of dentition status (p value < 0.001-0.034) except at the MR1M area where there was no statistically significant difference (p value = 0.094). HR protocol showed the highest prevalence of fully and partially corticated MC at almost all investigated areas while QS+ protocol showed the highest prevalence of invisible MC and clear and unclear non-corticated MC at almost all investigated areas.

CONCLUSIONS

QS+ protocol of i-CAT FLX CBCT machine is a recommended low-dose CBCT acquisition protocol for MC visibility at dentulous posterior mandibular regions while ST protocol is recommended at edentulous areas.