• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于丙泊酚的程序性镇静对法国急诊科不良事件风险的影响:一项回顾性分析。

Effect of propofol-based procedural sedation on risk of adverse events in a French emergency department: a retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Muller Barbara, Michalon Arnaud, Reuillard Adrien, Holman Anne Marie, Guihard Bertrand, Combes Xavier

机构信息

Emergency Department, Hôpital Felix Guyon, Saint Denis, CHU de la Réunion.

Emergency Department, Hôpital St Julien en Genevois.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(6):436-440. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000697.

DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000697
PMID:32459671
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Propofol is widely used today outside the operating room to facilitate painful procedures. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the frequency and type of complications related to a propofol-based procedural sedation protocol used in a French emergency department.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed the records over a 6-year period of all patients-adults and children-who received propofol for procedural sedation according to a pre-established protocol. The frequency and type of adverse events related to this sedation were recorded. Adverse events were classified according to the World Society of Intra-Veinous Anaesthesia International Sedation Task Force as sentinel, moderate, minor, or minimal.

RESULTS

During the study period, 602 patients-395 adults (66%) and 207 (34%) children-received propofol. The main indications for procedural sedation were fracture (n = 327) and dislocation (n = 222) reduction, pleural drain placement (n = 34), and abscess incision (n = 12). Among the 602 consecutive cases, we identified 90 adverse events (14.9%; 95% confidence interval: 12-17.7%). These 90 events were classified as 1 sentinel (hypotension episode), 5 moderate (2 airway obstruction and 3 apnea episodes), 83 minor, and 1 minimal risk-averse events. There were no adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Nearly all of the adverse events in our series were minor. In the French medical system, the use of propofol outside the operating room by non-anesthesiologist physicians for procedural sedation appears safe.

摘要

目的

目前丙泊酚在手术室以外被广泛用于辅助进行疼痛性操作。这项回顾性研究的目的是评估在法国一家急诊科使用基于丙泊酚的程序性镇静方案相关并发症的发生率及类型。

方法

这项回顾性研究对所有根据既定方案接受丙泊酚进行程序性镇静的成年和儿童患者的记录进行了为期6年的回顾。记录了与这种镇静相关的不良事件的发生率及类型。不良事件根据世界静脉麻醉学会国际镇静工作组的标准分为严重、中度、轻度或极小风险事件。

结果

在研究期间,602例患者接受了丙泊酚治疗,其中395例为成年人(66%),207例为儿童(34%)。程序性镇静的主要适应证为骨折(n = 327)和脱位复位(n = 222)、胸腔引流管置入(n = 34)以及脓肿切开(n = 12)。在这602例连续病例中,我们识别出90例不良事件(14.9%;95%置信区间:12 - 17.7%)。这90例事件被分类为1例严重(低血压发作)、5例中度(2例气道梗阻和3例呼吸暂停发作)、83例轻度以及1例极小风险规避事件。没有不良结局。

结论

我们系列中的几乎所有不良事件均为轻度。在法国医疗系统中,非麻醉科医生在手术室以外使用丙泊酚进行程序性镇静似乎是安全的。

相似文献

1
Effect of propofol-based procedural sedation on risk of adverse events in a French emergency department: a retrospective analysis.基于丙泊酚的程序性镇静对法国急诊科不良事件风险的影响:一项回顾性分析。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(6):436-440. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000697.
2
The incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia with propofol for procedures outside the operating room: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium.小儿异丙酚镇静/麻醉用于手术室以外操作期间不良事件的发生率及性质:来自小儿镇静研究联盟的报告
Anesth Analg. 2009 Mar;108(3):795-804. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818fc334.
3
Propofol for adult procedural sedation in a UK emergency department: safety profile in 1008 cases.英国急诊科成人程序镇静中丙泊酚的应用:1008 例安全性概况。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Oct;111(4):651-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet168. Epub 2013 May 9.
4
Procedural sedation with propofol: a retrospective review of the experiences of an emergency medicine residency program 2005 to 2010.异丙酚镇静的程序:2005 年至 2010 年急诊住院医师培训项目的经验回顾。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):706-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
5
A Safety Comparison of Single-Agent Methohexital, Ketamine, or Propofol for Musculoskeletal Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department.在急诊科进行肌肉骨骼程序镇静时,单药甲己炔巴比妥、氯胺酮或异丙酚的安全性比较。
J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug;63(2):290-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.10.011. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
6
Review article: Safety profile of propofol for paediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department.综述文章:在急诊科对儿科患者进行操作镇静时使用异丙酚的安全性概况。
Emerg Med Australas. 2010 Aug;22(4):265-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01298.x.
7
Profiling adverse respiratory events and vomiting when using propofol for emergency department procedural sedation.在急诊科使用丙泊酚进行程序性镇静时分析不良呼吸事件和呕吐情况。
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Oct;19(5):405-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00982.x.
8
Pediatric Procedural Sedation Using the Combination of Ketamine and Propofol Outside of the Emergency Department: A Report From the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium.儿科镇静研究联盟关于在急诊科以外使用氯胺酮和丙泊酚联合进行儿科程序性镇静的报告。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug;18(8):e356-e363. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001246.
9
Safety and efficacy of procedural sedation with propofol in a country with a young emergency medicine training program.在一个年轻的急诊医学培训计划的国家中,使用异丙酚进行程序镇静的安全性和疗效。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;18(3):162-7. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834230fb.
10
Propofol for procedural sedation in children in the emergency department.丙泊酚用于急诊科儿童程序性镇静。
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Dec;42(6):773-82. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00619-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Propofol as a Sole Sedative for fMRI Sedation in Autism Spectrum Disorder Individuals with Low IQ.丙泊酚作为单一镇静剂用于低智商自闭症谱系障碍个体功能磁共振成像镇静的疗效和安全性。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Feb 11. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06742-x.
2
Paradoxical Agitation and Masseter Spasm During Propofol Procedural Sedation: A Case Report.丙泊酚程序性镇静期间的矛盾性躁动和咬肌痉挛:一例报告
Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;8(4):369-371. doi: 10.5811/cpcem.21283.