Torkzaban Parviz, Ziaei Narges, Tootiaee Bahman, Khoshhal Masoumeh, Vafaee Fariborz, Panahandeh Narges
Dental Research Center, Department of Periodontics, Dental School, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Department of Periodontics, Dental Faculty, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2019;29(2):113-124. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2019031391.
This study assessed the effect of implant-abutment connection type on stress distribution in peri-implant bone and abutment micromovement using finite-element analysis (FEA). Dimensions of three implant-abutment designs were measured by a three-dimensional scanner and transferred to SOLIDWORKS. An elemental model was designed using ABAQUS. Each implant was placed in bone at the crestal level. A 100-N load was applied at a 45° angle relative to the longitudinal axis of the implant in the buccolingual direction from the palatal toward the buccal and coronal parts of the abutment. Shear stress, von Mises stress, and micromovement of the abutment relative to the fixture were analyzed. Data were reported qualitatively and quantitatively using ABAQUS. The von Mises stress in all three samples decreased from the crest toward the apical area and was distributed homogenously. Maximum stress concentration was at the most coronal part of the implant body in the midbuccal area. In cancellous and cortical bone, stress decreased from the crest toward the palate and was at its maximum at the midbuccal point in the bone crest. Stress in cortical bone was more homogenous and in cancellous bone was higher. Shear stress was higher in the buccal than in the palatal area, and at its maximum shear stress and equal in the mesiobuccal and distobuccal areas. Micromovement was 4.25 μm in an Astra implant, 5.42 μm in a Intra-Lock implant, and 6.63 μm in an SPI implant. The distribution of von Mises and shear stress was the same in bone around the three implant connection types; however, abutment micomovement differed.
本研究采用有限元分析(FEA)评估种植体-基台连接类型对种植体周围骨组织应力分布及基台微动的影响。使用三维扫描仪测量三种种植体-基台设计的尺寸,并将其导入SOLIDWORKS。利用ABAQUS设计单元模型。将每个种植体置于牙槽嵴顶水平的骨组织中。在相对于种植体长轴呈45°角的方向上,从腭侧向颊侧及基台的冠部施加100 N的载荷。分析基台相对于种植体的剪切应力、von Mises应力和微动情况。使用ABAQUS对数据进行定性和定量报告。所有三个样本中的von Mises应力均从牙槽嵴向根尖区域递减,并呈均匀分布。最大应力集中在种植体主体颊侧中部的最冠部。在松质骨和皮质骨中,应力从牙槽嵴向腭侧递减,在牙槽嵴颊侧中点处达到最大值。皮质骨中的应力更均匀,松质骨中的应力更高。颊侧的剪切应力高于腭侧,最大剪切应力出现在近中颊侧和远中颊侧区域,且二者相等。Astra种植体的微动为4.25μm,Intra-Lock种植体为5.42μm,SPI种植体为6.63μm。三种种植体连接类型周围骨组织中von Mises应力和剪切应力的分布相同;然而,基台微动有所不同。