Pellizzer Eduardo Piza, Verri Fellippo Ramos, Falcón-Antenucci Rosse Mary, Júnior Joel Ferreira Santiago, de Carvalho Paulo Sérgio Perri, de Moraes Sandra Lúcia Dantas, Noritomi Pedro Yoshito
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University, Brazil.
J Oral Implantol. 2012 Oct;38(5):587-94. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00041. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the platform-switching technique on stress distribution in implant, abutment, and peri-implant tissues, through a 3-dimensional finite element study. Three 3-dimensional mandibular models were fabricated using the SolidWorks 2006 and InVesalius software. Each model was composed of a bone block with one implant 10 mm long and of different diameters (3.75 and 5.00 mm). The UCLA abutments also ranged in diameter from 5.00 mm to 4.1 mm. After obtaining the geometries, the models were transferred to the software FEMAP 10.0 for pre- and postprocessing of finite elements to generate the mesh, loading, and boundary conditions. A total load of 200 N was applied in axial (0°), oblique (45°), and lateral (90°) directions. The models were solved by the software NeiNastran 9.0 and transferred to the software FEMAP 10.0 to obtain the results that were visualized through von Mises and maximum principal stress maps. Model A (implants with 3.75 mm/abutment with 4.1 mm) exhibited the highest area of stress concentration with all loadings (axial, oblique, and lateral) for the implant and the abutment. All models presented the stress areas at the abutment level and at the implant/abutment interface. Models B (implant with 5.0 mm/abutment with 5.0 mm) and C (implant with 5.0 mm/abutment with 4.1 mm) presented minor areas of stress concentration and similar distribution pattern. For the cortical bone, low stress concentration was observed in the peri-implant region for models B and C in comparison to model A. The trabecular bone exhibited low stress that was well distributed in models B and C. Model A presented the highest stress concentration. Model B exhibited better stress distribution. There was no significant difference between the large-diameter implants (models B and C).
本研究的目的是通过三维有限元研究,评估平台转换技术对种植体、基台及种植体周围组织应力分布的影响。使用SolidWorks 2006和InVesalius软件制作了三个三维下颌模型。每个模型由一个带有一根10毫米长、不同直径(3.75毫米和5.00毫米)种植体的骨块组成。UCLA基台的直径也从5.00毫米到4.1毫米不等。获得几何形状后,将模型转移到FEMAP 10.0软件中进行有限元的预处理和后处理,以生成网格、加载和边界条件。在轴向(0°)、斜向(45°)和侧向(90°)方向施加200 N的总载荷。模型由NeiNastran 9.0软件求解,并转移到FEMAP 10.0软件中以获得结果,这些结果通过冯·米塞斯应力和最大主应力图进行可视化。模型A(种植体直径3.75毫米/基台直径4.1毫米)在种植体和基台的所有载荷(轴向、斜向和侧向)下均表现出最高的应力集中区域。所有模型在基台水平以及种植体/基台界面处均呈现应力区域。模型B(种植体直径5.0毫米/基台直径5.0毫米)和模型C(种植体直径5.0毫米/基台直径4.1毫米)呈现出较小的应力集中区域和相似的分布模式。对于皮质骨,与模型A相比,模型B和C在种植体周围区域观察到较低的应力集中。小梁骨在模型B和C中表现出低应力且分布良好。模型A呈现出最高的应力集中。模型B表现出更好的应力分布。大直径种植体(模型B和C)之间没有显著差异。