Mallmann Suzana, Ferla Lia, Rodrigues Marina P, Paiva Luciana L, Sanches Paulo R S, Ferreira Charles F, Ramos José Geraldo L
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil; Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil; Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Jul;250:203-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 May 7.
To compare the effects of parasacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation with the effects of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in women with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB).
A randomized clinical trial was performed with 50 women aged 40-76 years with symptoms of OAB, divided into two groups: the parasacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation (PS) group and the transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTN) group. Both groups underwent the same protocol, at home, for 6 weeks, applying electrical stimulation three times per week. The tools used for evaluation were the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), the Overactive Bladder-Validated 8-question Awareness Tool (OAB-V8) and the Incontinence Severity Index (ISI). Statistical analysis was undertaken using independent t-test, Mann-Whitney test, Chi-squared test and generalized estimating equations.
After 6 weeks of treatment, OAB-V8 showed a significant improvement in the PTN group compared with the PS group (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.019). Post-intervention, no between-group differences were seen in terms of KHQ domains, average KHQ symptom scale and proportions of categories of ISI. All variables showed a significant effect of time after 6 weeks of treatment for both groups (p < 0.005).
Both forms of transcutaneous electrical stimulation seem to be effective and safe for home treatment of women with OAB.
比较骶旁经皮电刺激与胫后神经经皮电刺激对膀胱过度活动症(OAB)女性患者的治疗效果。
对50名年龄在40 - 76岁、有OAB症状的女性进行了一项随机临床试验,分为两组:骶旁经皮电刺激(PS)组和胫后神经经皮电刺激(PTN)组。两组在6周内于家中采用相同方案,每周进行3次电刺激。评估工具包括国王健康问卷(KHQ)、膀胱过度活动症 - 经验证的8项认知工具(OAB - V8)和尿失禁严重程度指数(ISI)。采用独立t检验、曼 - 惠特尼检验、卡方检验和广义估计方程进行统计分析。
治疗6周后,与PS组相比,PTN组的OAB - V8有显著改善(曼 - 惠特尼检验,p = 0.019)。干预后,在KHQ各领域、KHQ症状平均量表和ISI类别比例方面,两组间未见差异。两组治疗6周后,所有变量均显示出时间的显著影响(p < 0.005)。
两种经皮电刺激形式似乎对OAB女性患者的家庭治疗都是有效且安全的。