• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

某转诊中心十年间铅去除情况分析。

Analysis of a 10-year period of lead removal in a referral centre.

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Setubal, Setubal, Portugal.

Cardio-Thoracic Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental-Hospital de Santa Cruz, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Aug 1;31(2):166-173. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa078.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivaa078
PMID:32464643
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to analyse all lead extraction procedures (transvenous or open surgery) performed in our centre and the short- and long-term follow-up data from these patients.

METHODS

All lead extractions performed from 2008 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics and indications for device implantation; indications for lead extraction; techniques used; peri- and postprocedural complications and short- and long-term follow-up data.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients (282 leads) were included [age 70 (62-78) years; 72% men]. The median follow-up time was 57 (25-90) months. Patients with lead explants were excluded. The most common indication for lead removal was infection (77%). A surgical approach was necessary in 14 patients (9%) owing to unsuccessful transvenous removal (n = 3), large vegetation in the lead (n = 4), concomitant valvular endocarditis (n = 2), other indications for open surgery (n = 4) and complicated transvenous removal (n = 1). Removal was tried for 282 leads. Of those, 256 were completely removed. Clinical success was achieved in 155 individual patients (98%). Complications occurred in 6 patients: 3 persistent infections, 1 stroke and 2 blood vessel ruptures. The procedure-related mortality rate was 2% (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Lead removal was associated with a high success rate and low all-cause complication and mortality rates. Emergency surgery because of acute complications was rare, and open-heart surgery was most frequently elective and not associated with a worse outcome.

摘要

目的

分析本中心所有经静脉或开胸的心脏起搏器/除颤器(ICD)导线拔除术的操作过程及患者的短期和长期随访结果。

方法

回顾性分析 2008 年至 2017 年期间所有因心脏起搏器/除颤器相关问题而接受导线拔除术的患者的临床资料,包括患者特征、植入器械的适应证、导线拔除的适应证、使用的技术、围手术期和术后并发症以及短期和长期随访结果。

结果

共纳入 159 例患者(282 根导线)[年龄 70(62-78)岁;72%为男性]。中位随访时间为 57(25-90)个月。排除了接受导线修复的患者。导线拔除的主要适应证是感染(77%)。由于经静脉拔除失败(n=3)、导线内有大的赘生物(n=4)、同期合并瓣膜心内膜炎(n=2)、其他开胸手术适应证(n=4)和经静脉拔除操作复杂(n=1),14 例患者(9%)需要行手术治疗。282 根导线尝试拔除,其中 256 根完全拔除。155 例患者(98%)达到临床成功。6 例患者出现并发症:3 例持续性感染,1 例脑卒中,2 例血管破裂。手术相关死亡率为 2%(n=3)。

结论

心脏起搏器/除颤器导线拔除术成功率高,总体并发症和死亡率低。因急性并发症而紧急手术的情况罕见,开胸手术多为择期手术,且不增加不良预后。

相似文献

1
Analysis of a 10-year period of lead removal in a referral centre.某转诊中心十年间铅去除情况分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Aug 1;31(2):166-173. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa078.
2
Efficacy and safety of transvenous lead extraction in 108 consecutive patients: a single-centre experience.108例连续患者经静脉导线拔除术的疗效与安全性:单中心经验
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 May 1;28(5):704-708. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy351.
3
The analysis of indications and early results of transvenous lead extraction in patients with a pacemaker, ICD and CRT - single-center experience.起搏器、植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)和心脏再同步治疗(CRT)患者经静脉导线拔除的适应证分析及早期结果——单中心经验
Acta Cardiol. 2015 Dec;70(6):685-92. doi: 10.2143/AC.70.6.3120181.
4
Hybrid transvenous lead extraction during cardiac surgery for valvular endocarditis.心脏手术中经静脉混合心内膜炎瓣心导线拔除术。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;31(8):2101-2106. doi: 10.1111/jce.14595. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
5
Transvenous extraction of cardiac rhythm device leads: a report of the experience from a single referral centre in Greece.经静脉取出心脏节律装置导线:希腊一家转诊中心的经验报告。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2015 Jan-Feb;56(1):55-60.
6
Influence of vegetation shape on outcomes in transvenous lead extractions: Does shape matter?植被形状对经静脉导线拔除术结果的影响:形状是否重要?
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Apr;17(4):646-653. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
7
Unrecognized venous injuries after cardiac implantable electronic device transvenous lead extraction.心脏植入式电子设备经静脉导线拔除术后未识别的静脉损伤。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Mar;15(3):318-325. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Nov 12.
8
Differences in laser lead extraction of infected vs. non-infected leads.感染性与非感染性导线的激光导线拔除差异。
Heart Vessels. 2018 Oct;33(10):1245-1250. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1162-0. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
9
Transvenous Lead Extraction in Chronic Kidney Disease and Dialysis Patients With Infected Cardiac Devices.经静脉心脏器械拔除术在慢性肾脏病和透析合并感染性心脏装置患者中的应用。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Jan;11(1):e005706. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005706.
10
Procedural outcomes and long-term survival associated with lead extraction in patients with abandoned leads.废弃导线拔除术患者的操作结果和长期生存与导线有关。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Jun;15(6):855-859. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Jan 8.